• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Rotorua 'International' Stadium

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
62 Posts 24 Posters 6.8k Views
Rotorua 'International' Stadium
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Crash on last edited by
    #30

    @Crash 4 games at Eden Park in one tour might be a little much. This isn't England.

    I assume they really wanted a non-Super base, in which case the naki would have been the go.

    Tauranga not having a stadium really is ridiculously short sighted.

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #31

    @mariner4life

    I didn't think Blue Chip or whatever it's called these days was too bad, on a visit there for a Canterbury VS BOP game. For some reason I picture it now as fully encircled by stands and all-seated but possibly the stands are shallow and well back from the pitch ?? Now I have to google it up....

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #32

    @shark Don't bother looking up the Speedway stadium, the Bay don't even play there any more. It was all seater and under cover but you're a long way from the field. Some happy memories of watching a decent team there ....

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    My 2c ...

    It had to be played out of Auckland but close to there and near the majority of population.

    It had to be a place with a lot of accommodation.

    It had to be a reasonably large stadium.

    Rotorua ticks all three despite the limitations of the facility.

    Dunedin ticks one (stadium)

    New Plymouth one and a half (a little further from Akl)

    Napier maybe three halves.

    Hamilton may have been an option ... but the Chiefs game ...

    Wellington may have been a better bet but they have two games next week.

    Tauranga - nuh
    Palmy - nuh
    North Harbour - well that's Auckland

    I can see the logic in Rotovegas. But as has been pointed out the stadium is not three best option.

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #34

    Rotorua has Is ground where the events management team always underestimate the set-up needed. In past years, even with a crowd of just 4,000or 5,000 expected, they still manage to have too few ticket booths operating. It's like they have a formula of: Expected Crowd + 70% of Required Resources = What What We'll Do Then Act Surprised.

    Paradoxically, it's a great place to watch rugby when there's a small crowd. Not so much atmosphere wise though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    Well I guess they've only had about 12 years to prepare.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #36

    @booboo said in Rotorua 'International' Stadium:

    My 2c ...

    It had to be played out of Auckland but close to there and near the majority of population.

    It had to be a place with a lot of accommodation.

    It had to be a reasonably large stadium.

    Rotorua ticks all three despite the limitations of the facility.

    Dunedin ticks one (stadium)

    New Plymouth one and a half (a little further from Akl)

    Napier maybe three halves.

    Hamilton may have been an option ... but the Chiefs game ...

    Wellington may have been a better bet but they have two games next week.

    Tauranga - nuh
    Palmy - nuh
    North Harbour - well that's Auckland

    I can see the logic in Rotovegas. But as has been pointed out the stadium is not three best option.

    Why did it have to be played close to Auckland? It could easily have been played in Christchurch or Dunedin on the back of the Crusaders and Highlanders games.

    SammyCS KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • SammyCS Offline
    SammyCS Offline
    SammyC
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #37

    @shark said in Rotorua 'International' Stadium:

    @booboo said in Rotorua 'International' Stadium:

    My 2c ...

    It had to be played out of Auckland but close to there and near the majority of population.

    It had to be a place with a lot of accommodation.

    It had to be a reasonably large stadium.

    Rotorua ticks all three despite the limitations of the facility.

    Dunedin ticks one (stadium)

    New Plymouth one and a half (a little further from Akl)

    Napier maybe three halves.

    Hamilton may have been an option ... but the Chiefs game ...

    Wellington may have been a better bet but they have two games next week.

    Tauranga - nuh
    Palmy - nuh
    North Harbour - well that's Auckland

    I can see the logic in Rotovegas. But as has been pointed out the stadium is not three best option.

    Why did it have to be played close to Auckland? It could easily have been played in Christchurch or Dunedin on the back of the Crusaders and Highlanders games.

    Also would have encouraged a few more lions supporters down this way.

    Whilst there was a good amount in Christchurch for the crusaders game, it was nothing like 12 years ago.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #38

    @shark said in Rotorua 'International' Stadium:

    @booboo said in Rotorua 'International' Stadium:

    My 2c ...

    It had to be played out of Auckland but close to there and near the majority of population.

    It had to be a place with a lot of accommodation.

    It had to be a reasonably large stadium.

    Rotorua ticks all three despite the limitations of the facility.

    Dunedin ticks one (stadium)

    New Plymouth one and a half (a little further from Akl)

    Napier maybe three halves.

    Hamilton may have been an option ... but the Chiefs game ...

    Wellington may have been a better bet but they have two games next week.

    Tauranga - nuh
    Palmy - nuh
    North Harbour - well that's Auckland

    I can see the logic in Rotovegas. But as has been pointed out the stadium is not three best option.

    Why did it have to be played close to Auckland? It could easily have been played in Christchurch or Dunedin on the back of the Crusaders and Highlanders games.

    The reason for playing it close to Auckland because it's a week out from the first test in Auckland and they probably wanted somewhere where people could travel to/from without an extra flight.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #39

    I don't think an extra flight was required given they could have flown (e.g.) Dunedin to Hamilton Sunday rather than Dunedin to Rotorua on a Wednesday.

    However if as seems the only logical proposition you don't want to go to the SI twice then playing 3 games in two cities in 8 days probably wasn't the best option.

    With hindsight the Prov Baba's could/should have been at N Plymouth and The Maori at Okara Park (or whatever its called nowadays)

    RapidoR KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #40

    @dogmeat said in Rotorua 'International' Stadium:

    I don't think an extra flight was required given they could have flown (e.g.) Dunedin to Hamilton Sunday rather than Dunedin to Rotorua on a Wednesday.

    However if as seems the only logical proposition you don't want to go to the SI twice then playing 3 games in two cities in 8 days probably wasn't the best option.

    With hindsight the Prov Baba's could/should have been at N Plymouth and The Maori at Okara Park (or whatever its called nowadays)

    Okara Park and Rotorua Stadium are almost identical though.

    taniwharugbyT nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #41

    @Rapido yeah while it's great to get 20k through the gates in Whangarei, the grounds are not set up to adequately service that number.

    An Irish guy commented in the toilets about how long he had to wait at half time and I just told him we normally get 1/4 of that number to games so isn't ever a concern, and given this happens so infrequently, it doesn't bother me 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #42

    @Rapido said in Rotorua 'International' Stadium:

    @dogmeat said in Rotorua 'International' Stadium:

    I don't think an extra flight was required given they could have flown (e.g.) Dunedin to Hamilton Sunday rather than Dunedin to Rotorua on a Wednesday.

    However if as seems the only logical proposition you don't want to go to the SI twice then playing 3 games in two cities in 8 days probably wasn't the best option.

    With hindsight the Prov Baba's could/should have been at N Plymouth and The Maori at Okara Park (or whatever its called nowadays)

    Okara Park and Rotorua Stadium are almost identical though.

    I was at both venues - both were wet as, with mud underfoot. Whangarei was much closer to town though - a relatively short walk. Rotorua suffered from the distance, and the need to bus everyone closer to the ground.

    I say closer, as it was still a 10 minute walk to the bank 🙂

    Also, having been to many rugby games, I expect not to eat or drink at the ground. Getting beers can often be a 20 minute round trip (or more at halftime), and it's just not worth it. Preload, sideload or just make do ... whatever works, but I personally have given up on getting service at busy stadia

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #43

    @dogmeat I think the point is I'd imagine for a lot of Lions tour party their first game was Rotorua. So if they base themselves in Auckland for the first test, arrive a week early and get to/from Rotorua easily.

    The Crusaders specifically requested their game was early in the tour to increase it's hype and the Lions would have wanted to play the strongest two non-test teams (on paper) the two Saturdays before test 1.

    dogmeatD taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #44

    @KiwiMurph I was meaning change the venues nit the programme

    @rapido Many years since the only time I attended Okara (GO HARBOUR) but I thought it had enjoyed a significant upgrade. To hear them up north speak it's the Allianz Stadium of the South Pacific whereas Rotorua is more like an Alliance abbatoir

    nzzpN KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by taniwharugby
    #45

    @KiwiMurph Not sure about this time, but in 2005 the Lions wanted their opening match in Whangarei.

    @dogmeat you might be a cnut! 🖕🏻 😉 Nothing wrong with our stadium for our normal crowds of under 5000

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #46

    @rapido Many years since the only time I attended Okara (GO HARBOUR) but I thought it had enjoyed a significant upgrade. To hear them up north speak it's the Allianz Stadium of the South Pacific whereas Rotorua is more like an Alliance abbatoir

    Rotorua featured an old school, open air (no roof) urinal system with classic masonry half-pipes. Standing there in the pissing rain having a piss was super-ironic.

    They seemed (in the low light) to have given the back of the urinal a good coat of paint though 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #47

    @dogmeat I'm suggesting that potentially one of the reasons for the venue of the Maori game the Saturday before test 1 being close to Auckland is for travelling Lions fans.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #48

    Inter-provincial stadium teasing.

    Why did Whangarei cope supposedly better? Less out of towners? Or just simply that the stadium is walkable?

    Rotorua:
    alt text

    alt text

    Okara Park:
    alt text

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #49

    Okara classic:

    alt text

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ6XQON63VPgHnAh1eHbmO65SkmagYPxgi6x4BYY2XnU2W-6lehQw

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2

Rotorua 'International' Stadium
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.