• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Blues win percentage against NZ teams

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
blues
142 Posts 33 Posters 12.1k Views
Blues win percentage against NZ teams
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #11

    @hooroo

    Yes, it can be lonely being right

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #12

    @duluth said in Blues win percentage against NZ teams:

    @hooroo

    Yes, it can be lonely being right

    In comparison to the last two choppers but he was hardly burning it up either.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #13

    @hooroo He took the Blues to the semi final - losing to the eventual champion Reds. Kirwan or Tana have got nowhere near that since.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #14

    @kiwimurph said in Blues win percentage against NZ teams:

    @hooroo He took the Blues to the semi final - losing to the eventual champion Reds. Kirwan or Tana have got nowhere near that since.

    ... and we coulda shoulda won that game. Every time we kept it tight we smashed them up front and made shedloads of metres. But no, we kept spinning it wide, and wound up losing.

    I still remember it (through blue tinted glasses?)

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #15

    @nzzp

    From memory, Munro and Payne had shockers. Lam made a bad mistake in picking Munro as a winger ahead of Ranger

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #16

    @duluth Yep he put Ranger on the bench and started Munro. Munro was very poor - Ranger carved up off the bench but it was too little too late.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Duluth on last edited by Chris B.
    #17

    @duluth Have you got Lam's results by year? Was his fourth year an aberration or was he on a declining trend?

    Would be interesting to chart the Crusaders results against NZ opposition as a comparison. I'm pretty sure those results would also deteriorate during Toddy's reign - in part, because he wasn't as good a coach as Deans or Robertson - but also because I'm pretty sure the Chiefs, Canes and Highlanders have all become markedly stronger teams (four titles between them since 2011, none before). At various points recruitment rules have become less regionalized which also probably worked against the more recent Blues coaches.

    I daresay someone who was statistically adept and interested enough could adjust the stats to reflect the calibre of the opposition and more accurately reflect the relative calibre of the coaches.

    Unfortunately, I suspect this still won't help Tana that much!

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #18

    @chris-b said in Blues win percentage against NZ teams:

    @duluth Have you got Lam's results by year? Was his fourth year an aberration or was he on a declining trend?

    Upwards trend. Complete collapse in 2012

    2009: 1/4 vs NZ, 5/13 overall
    2010: 2/4 vs NZ, 7/13 overall
    2011 : 6/8 vs NZ, 11/18 overall

    Steady improvement.. then 2012 was a collapse 0/8 vs NZ 4/18 overall

    It all depends on what leeway you give him for the injury crisis

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPieK Offline
    KiwiPie
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    For a number of years, the Chiefs and the Highlanders were pretty ropey and the Hurricanes were the Hurricanes. Now all the other 4 franchises seem to be well run which makes the Blues stand out as the poorest.

    I think it is connected to the head coach but goes beyond that. Look at the injuries the Chiefs are currently coping with. We in the Bay were baffled by Ardron's selection for the Chiefs given his lame work at number 8 for us that saw him benched often. Now not only does he look like a class player, he is also doing it as a lock - not just the head coach can be responsible for that transformation, the environment must be a key factor and the coaching team etc must have done some serious work on his game in the past few months.

    And right now all the top 4 franchises seem to be able to bring in guys from anywhere and have them playing well as soon as they walk onto the grass in Super rugby.

    With the Blues, it seems to have the opposite effect. Promising players quickly become a shadow of what they were before. Which suggests that the rot runs deep and shuffling the chairs/recruiting a star or 2 isn't going to change that.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @kiwipie said in Blues win percentage against NZ teams:

    And right now all the top 4 franchises seem to be able to bring in guys from anywhere and have them playing well as soon as they walk onto the grass in Super rugby.

    Which suggests that the rot runs deep and shuffling the chairs/recruiting a star or 2 isn't going to change that.

    Yes, which has also being discussed in detail by various Blues fans. Problems with the board have been talked about ad nauseam, as have problems with recruitment (which Umaga has some responsibility for)

    I know you didn't do this, but there is a strawman that the Blues fans only blame the coach which is absolutely not true
    The coach should be judged for what he is control of: initial squad selection, match day selection, coaches he decides to delegate too, game plan, preparation etc etc

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to KiwiPie on last edited by
    #21

    @kiwipie said in Blues win percentage against NZ teams:

    Now all the other 4 franchises seem to be well run which makes the Blues stand out as the poorest.

    Well we can expand it to look at a some results against non NZ sides

    2 matches ago the Blues conceded 63 points at home against a Saffa side. The worst home defeat in history beating the previous record of 51 from 2004

    7 matches ago was the most embarrassing loss in Blues history vs the Sunwolves. Great tactics of throw it around in 42 degree heat to tire out the smaller fitter guys who are used to the conditions..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Genuine question - are there any Blues fans happy with Umaga?

    I see a lot of excuses for Umaga, and indeed support for Umaga, from people who aren't Blues supporters.

    I understand that. He was a popular player and supporting him doesn't impact your team. In fact it helps your team..

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #23

    @duluth well no it wont skew the %, but given the more frequent matches, and in a bad year you will potentially lose twice as many games as you would in one off years.

    Not defending Umaga, just when you say by the end of 3 years he will have had 24 games v NZ teams, whereas say Henry would have taken 6 years for that many (not counting finals had Umagas Blues made it...)

    What it does show is that Henry's % over a longer period is even more impressive, whereas short term success is (in theory) easier to achieve.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by Duluth
    #24

    @taniwharugby said in Blues win percentage against NZ teams:

    @duluth well no it wont skew the %, but given the more frequent matches, and in a bad year you will potentially lose twice as many games as you would in one off years.

    Sure, it's possible to 'run up the score' to some degree. However that does not explain the trend, or the drop of from Kirwans shitty tenure.

    It does show that he hasn't made gains on the other NZ sides in three years (I know some Umaga sycophants don't think its fair to compare a team to its contemporaries.. which of course is a ludicrous position and should be laughed at)

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    So from this point, what would be a pass mark in the last 5 derby matches? Three of these games are at Eden Park

    One could be an aberration. Two out of five? That would show some signs of life I guess..

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #26

    @duluth with 3/5 at EP, they should to be 'aiming' for 5 wins, but realistically should be 3/5, and that being the pass mark, but I expect there will be singing in corridors of Mt Eden if they get 2/5....anything less than 2/5 should be totally unacceptable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    I'll be really surprised if they win 1 out of 5.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #28

    @kiwimurph that wasn't what he asked 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    Pass mark is winning all the home games.

    You can’t compare to the first part of the season and accept mediocrity as the new normal. We are in a hole, a good coach will get you out of it.

    If you can’t even win your home games it’s all over.

    Mind you, I though he should have resigned after the utter embarrassment of shipping 63 points on Eden Park.

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by Hooroo
    #30

    @kirwan said in Blues win percentage against NZ teams:

    Pass mark is winning all the home games.

    You can’t compare to the first part of the season and accept mediocrity as the new normal. We are in a hole, a good coach will get you out of it.

    If you can’t even win your home games it’s all over.

    Mind you, I though he should have resigned after the utter embarrassment of shipping 63 points on Eden Park.

    I think the Blues will be like the Chiefs of Pre Rennie days. Hopeless but will beat a NZ team at the wrong time to stuff that teams chances come the pointy end.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Blues win percentage against NZ teams
Sports Talk
blues
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.