• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

England v South Africa

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
265 Posts 47 Posters 12.0k Views
England v South Africa
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #5

    Even missing Willie Le Roux and Faf De Klerk that is a strong-looking Boks team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by akan004
    #6

    That England forward pack should get eaten up by the Bok eight.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #7

    @akan004 said in England v South Africa:

    That England forward pack should get eaten up by the Bok eight.

    Will certainly be a tough test for England's new back row. Will be some bruises to wear before facing us.

    I also suspect that Itoje may go missing in the tight once he gets smashed by the big Saffas a few times.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    This could go either way but if SA believe they can go 3-1 versus England in 2018

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Yeah that forward pack is going to take England to the cleaners.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to Crucial on last edited by akan004
    #10

    @crucial Don't know much about the English loosehead prop but Kyle Sinckler is one of the weakest scrummaging tightheads around. The only question is whether or not the Boks can lift against a team that is not wearing black, if they can then I think they should have too much for this English team.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #11

    @akan004 said in England v South Africa:

    @crucial Don't know much about the English loosehead prop but Kyle Sinckler is one of the weakest scrummaging tightheads around. The only question is whether or not the Boks can lift against a team that is not wearing black, if they can then I think they should have too much against this English team.

    Alec Hepburn does not look your archetypal loosehead, he looks a bit lightweight, however if his stats on the Exeter Chiefs website are to be believed he's no midget at 6'1" and 17 plus stone. Maybe he gets measured by the same guy that does Ardie Savea?

    He's probably the favoured loosehead at Exeter and rarely does it seem that he's a weak scrimmaging link and he gets about the park and carries well. He's now played at under 20 and senior level for England despite being born in Australia. not sure how he qualifies, parents or Grandparents I guess.

    Edit: Qualifies through his English father, apparently took up rugby at school in England and played county level under 17s.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #12

    @catogrande said in England v South Africa:

    @akan004 said in England v South Africa:

    @crucial Don't know much about the English loosehead prop but Kyle Sinckler is one of the weakest scrummaging tightheads around. The only question is whether or not the Boks can lift against a team that is not wearing black, if they can then I think they should have too much against this English team.

    Alec Hepburn does not look your archetypal loosehead, he looks a bit lightweight, however if his stats on the Exeter Chiefs website are to be believed he's no midget at 6'1" and 17 plus stone. Maybe he gets measured by the same guy that does Ardie Savea?

    If that's the case he must be about 5'2" to start with

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    I'm always confused about the racial requirements of the boks. It's always in the news, 50% for rwc and 45% now. But that team has only a handful of players of colour. So they make these rules and just ignore them?

    This will be a tight game, England b vs the boks minus their most important current player. As mentioned above, are the boks up for a non ABs game?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    2 locks on the bench for Boks. Interesting.

    CrucialC Billy WebbB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #15

    @rapido said in England v South Africa:

    2 locks on the bench for Boks. Interesting.

    lock will be the weak point for England as the game goes on. Could be a clever strategy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #16

    @rapido said in England v South Africa:

    2 locks on the bench for Boks. Interesting.

    Pieter Steph du Toit will most likely be shifted to no. 7 (in your speak = no.6) at some point.
    My guess is in place of Whitely with Duane moving to 8.

    So likely subbed off will be Whitely for Lood de Jager(50min) and Etzebeth for RG Snyman(65min)...

    I am guessing from all of the above that Rassie is expecting a heavy slow paddock requiring lots of grunt up front.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #18

    @stargazer said in England v South Africa:

    He is fucking cursed. Poor bastard.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Jeez base an entire backline around the dreams of one guy and he keeps getting injured. Eddie must be spitting tacks.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    England by 3.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #21

    @act-crusader said in England v South Africa:

    England by 3.

    No way, SA by 2.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    SA by 15

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #23

    @no-quarter said in England v South Africa:

    @act-crusader said in England v South Africa:

    England by 3.

    No way, SA by 2.

    Nah, England all the way. Springboks are my hatiest team. Even cheer for the Aussies when they play each other.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #24

    @machpants said in England v South Africa:

    Jeez base an entire backline around the dreams of one guy and he keeps getting injured. Eddie must be spitting tacks.

    Eggs,baskets and all that.
    Eddie’s hopes and dreams hinge around Billy V and Tuilagi

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

England v South Africa
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.