• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v Bangladesh

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
125 Posts 32 Posters 3.3k Views
Black Caps v Bangladesh
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #97

    @dogmeat said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    @Virgil said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    8,000 ODI runs for Roscoe

    this is such a fantastic effort and massive for anyone let alone a Black Cap. GOAT at ODI level ? I think so. Given he walks into an all time test team too I'm gonna go on record saying she's gonna be a sad day when he hangs up the pads.

    I applaud your bravery in going out on a limb like that 🙄

    farrrrk off carrrrnt.

    Let me have my moment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #98

    @Virgil said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    Oh and the banger who scored his ton, has he been watching too many David Warner highlights?
    Anyone would have thought he scored a match winning 100...

    seemed like its the first time he's ever scored a ton in international cricket..

    oh wait it was..
    some of you guys are just haters

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #99

    @Gunner our catching has overall been really poor. Throwing at the stumps also below standard. For a side that has always made up ground with its fielding the Indian side was clearly better in the field.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #100

    @kev said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    @Gunner our catching has overall been really poor. Throwing at the stumps also below standard. For a side that has always made up ground with its fielding the Indian side was clearly better in the field.

    That's my biggest concern going into the CWC. I think on our day we have the talent to match it with the big boys, but if our fielding is as poor as it has been this summer it will definitely cost an important match. I would hate us to be a couple of dropped catches away from making the semis/final...

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • SneakdefreakS Offline
    SneakdefreakS Offline
    Sneakdefreak
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #101

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    @Sneakdefreak said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    Yeah Munro isn't making the CWC squad now. Probably opens up a slot for Sodhi if Stead wants to take three spinners to the CWC.

    I still reckon he'll make it. they've invested alot in him.

    I think he's in, as well.

    First choice XI - Guptill, Nicholls, Williamson, Taylor, Latham, Neesham, CDG, Santner, Henry, Ferguson, Boult

    Spare batsman/allrounder - Munro
    Spare keeper - Seifert
    Spare seamer - Southee
    Spare spinner - Astle

    Proviso that Sodhi or Milne might yet take one of the spare slots - but, I can't see really see an alternative to Munro - unless Corey Anderson suddenly comes good. Even then - he's not going to cover the top order batting spots.

    I see the four reserves being Southee (seamer), Astle (allrounder and Stead's favourite player), Sodhi (spinner) and Seifret (batsman/keeper). The first choice XI is spot on.

    Corey Anderson could still sneak in and I'm not certain that Seifret has his spot yet (Tom Blundell could be a bolter there).

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #102

    @Virgil said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    Southee gets a michelle.. a very expensive Michelle

    Would have been such a different story if Lockie didn’t drop the century maker when he was still in a donut...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Sneakdefreak on last edited by
    #103

    @Sneakdefreak I think if Seifert was a serious contender to cover the batting, surely they would have given him an ODI game against the Indians or the Bangles?

    You could be right about three spinners, but only if they expect to play two of them in almost all matches (Astle probably subbing in for CdG).

    I'm not sure that either of Astle or Santner are such vital cogs in the wheel that if they got injured you wouldn't just ship them home and fly in Ish.

    SneakdefreakS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SneakdefreakS Offline
    SneakdefreakS Offline
    Sneakdefreak
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by Sneakdefreak
    #104

    @Chris-B Should have played Seifert but Stead stuck to his best side throughout that series although it would have made more sense to trial the guys in contention for the reserve spots (Seifret, Sodhi, Astle, Bundell, Young etc).

    I'm not sold on Seifert at all and would rather make Nicholls the backup but it's probably too much to place on Nicholls since he is already covering batting positions 1-6. In saying that, Seifert is a similar batsman to Munro imo and Munro is a naff bowler while Seifert can keep so Seifert > Munro there.

    I'm only going with three spinners because we are apparently playing at venues where spin is favoured so it would be wise to have more than one and a half options of Santner and maybe Williamson.

    Last CWC we went with three bowlers and one keeper/batsman as our reserves (Mills, McCleghan, N McCullum and Latham) and don't see us changing that.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #105

    @Virgil said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    Southee gets a michelle.. a very expensive Michelle

    Looks like the most expensive 6fer in ODIs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Sneakdefreak on last edited by Chris B.
    #106

    @Sneakdefreak said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    I'm not sold on Seifert at all and would rather make Nicholls the backup but it's probably too much to place on Nicholls since he is already covering batting positions 1-6. In saying that, Seifert is a similar batsman to Munro imo and Munro is a naff bowler while Seifert can keep so Seifert > Munro there.

    Problem with Seifert is that he's only batted in two ODIs and never in the top order. So most likely they'd move Latham and have Seifert take the gloves and bat lower down.

    Whereas Munro is arguably direct cover for Guptill, Nicholls, Neesham and CdG - and indirect cover for Little Kane and Rossco (Nicholls moving down). Admittedly somewhat shit cover - but, cover.

    Agree that Stead was too conservative - especially against the Bangles. Although I guess he did rest Little Kane. I would have rested Boult instead of Henry in the last one, as well.

    Overall, I don't think we've really got the quality to win this CWC - we've got just enough to possibly fluke it. I'd say a par performance would be scrapping into the play-offs...or perhaps even just missing out.

    rotatedR K 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #107

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    Problem with Seifert is that he's only batted in two ODIs and never in the top order.

    At this point that likely works in his favour. The book is out on Munro. Now I favour the chances of an unknown Seifert having a big knock that Munro whatever theoretical T20 form we thought he might have.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #108

    The fielding is an interesting one at the moment. I don't think it'll matter whether we send Munro or recall Matt Sinclair for the CWC if we keep fielding like we have lately...

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #109

    @rotated I guess that the international analysts won't have looked at Seifert much might be an advantage in the short run.

    Can't say I'd expect a great deal from either him or Munro - but, at this late stage, I'm thinking they'll both be there - I'm hoping neither will be required to play.

    Bigger immediate concern is what we're likely to see from Nicholls when we're chasing 320+ to win. He's not shown much capacity to really go from ball 1.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by kev
    #110

    @Chris-B Against quality opposition ( e.g. Indians ) I don’t think CDG is such an effective allrounder. His batting technique looked at times very much tail end. Prefer both Neesham and Bracewell in the hitting role against quality attacks. However I think generally the alrounder role is overdone and we should have another bowler.

    Guptill, Nicholls, Williamson, Taylor, Latham, Neesham, Santner, Southee, Henry, Ferguson, Boult.

    Also think the short ball has been over used. Reducing the frequency with which it is bowled will allow it have more impact.

    MN5M Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #111

    @kev said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    @Chris-B Against quality opposition ( e.g. Indians ) I don’t think CDG is such an effective allrounder. His batting technique looked at times very much tail end. Prefer both Neesham and Bracewell in the hitting role against quality attacks. However I think generally the alrounder role is overdone and we should have another bowler.

    Guptill, Nicholls, Williamson, Taylor, Latham, Neesham, Santner, Southee, Henry, Ferguson, Boult.

    Also think the short ball has been over used. Reducing the frequency with which it is bowled will allow it have more impact.

    Hang on....just to clarify so I can retort with the appropriate level of outrage....

    Are you saying Bracewell is a better batsman than CDGH ?

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #112

    @MN5 Not enough of a difference in that hitting role. The strike rate in terms of turning, winning or even finishing a game against quality opposition has been really low. Doug is a much better bowler and I would favour that skill in terms of team mix over batting. If our front 5/6 batters (if you include) Neesham fail we will lose anyway.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #113

    @kev I think both Colins are "gambit" players. They'll come off occasionally and blitz an opposition - but regular failures come with the territory. BMac was similar, but a more reliable gambit.

    I think we can afford - and probably need - one gambit player in the team for the CWC. Mainly because we don't have enough quality to consistently beat teams like India. Boult, Guppy, Kane and Rossco will usually get us across the line against the mediocre teams, but someone like CdG is a roll of the dice to help us beat India, Australia, England and South Africa. He might only come of two times in 10 - but, maybe those times will be in the semi and final!

    That's my strategy anyway. I don't think Doug Bracewell's bowling is going to win us a world cup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #114

    Dialling back any expectations for this world cup. Will still hang on every ball but we are really quite inconsistent at the moment.
    Might even scour my memory for coping mechanisms used 10 years ago when we were woeful, for our upcoming shock loss to Afghanistan spinners on the 8th of June. 😏

    CdG to surprise all and be one of our best performers on English conditions

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #115

    Anything less than the semi's will be a disappointment.

    Anything more than the semi's will be a shock!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #116

    @Siam said in Black Caps v Bangladesh:

    CdG to surprise all and be one of our best performers on English conditions

    We're hoping a hitter like him finds a couple of weeks of good form, and just rides his luck to the final.

    But yeah, not expectant of this cup

    PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Black Caps v Bangladesh
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.