• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
165 Posts 49 Posters 5.7k Views
Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #49

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @No-Quarter I'd play Nonu at first five ahead of Jordie! 🙂

    Nonu is short and actually has a decent boot on him. Think we're on to something here.

    JKJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    I went for Ioane, 3 Ioane’s in a team are unstoppable.

    And I thought he went alright last year.

    And all the options are shit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Darren
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    I like JB, but I think it's 50/50 that he will cost us a game.
    Even if his kick is a little slow, there is always a chance he would throw an intercept pass. I'd be fine if he was playing a game against a minnow, but I'd have no fingernails if used at 10 in a real test.
    I would play for 3rd string whoever has the least chance to f it up. I'm thinking Black.
    Just has to distribute without an intercept and kick ok.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #52

    @Chester-Draws There is certainly some truth to that.

    But, in a physical game like rugby, size is going to be an advantage in every position - everything else being equal. And yet these huge players don't emerge as elite halfbacks and first fives - when they've got that initial size advantage. So there must be other factors working against them.

    I think there's probably a corollary with Jonah Lomu. Everyone saw the massive advantage that a 118kg wing could give a team - but, subsequently wings that size have been scarce as hens' teeth - because at the end of the day, there's very few 118 kg guys who can run fast enough to play on the wing.

    Very few big guys with the deftness to play in the inside backs.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #53

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @Chester-Draws There is certainly some truth to that.

    But, in a physical game like rugby, size is going to be an advantage in every position - everything else being equal. And yet these huge players don't emerge as elite halfbacks and first fives - when they've got that initial size advantage. So there must be other factors working against them.

    I think there's probably a corollary with Jonah Lomu. Everyone saw the massive advantage that a 118kg wing could give a team - but, subsequently wings that size have been scarce as hens' teeth - because at the end of the day, there's very few 118 kg guys who can run fast enough to play on the wing.

    Very few big guys with the deftness to play in the inside backs.

    These days there's heaps actually.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #54

    @MN5 There's Nemani Nadolo. Remind me of some others.

    MN5M NepiaN rotatedR 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by MN5
    #55

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 There's Nemani Nadolo. Remind me of some others.

    What's the cut off ? Some of these guys are pretty close in weight......

    George North, Tim Visser, English guy Joe whatever, Matt Banahan, Nikki Walker, Julian Savea, one or two of the Tuilagis.....

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #56

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 There's Nemani Nadolo. Remind me of some others.

    That fat Fijian wing who plays for the Wallabies must be pushing close to that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #57

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 There's Nemani Nadolo. Remind me of some others.

    I would need to see a graph with Caucau's playing ability and weight to see where they intersect before offering him up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to MN5 on last edited by sparky
    #58

    @MN5 Honiball was the guy I thought of when I was trying to imagine the best case scenario for Jordie at 10. Henry Honiball was 1.85 tall, Jordie Barrett is 1.96.

    I think you could have Jordie at 10 against Canada or Namibia, but you would probably have the half back doing all the clearance kicks.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #59

    @sparky said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 Honiball was the guy I thought of when I was trying to imagine the best case scenario for Jordie at 10. Henry Honiball was 1.85 tall, Jordie Barrett is 1.96.

    I think you could have Jordie at 10 against Canada or Namibia, but you would probably have the half back doing all the clearance kicks.

    It's not boxing.

    Rugby stats can be wildly inaccurate. Adam Thomson was heavier than Jerome Kaino apparently.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #60

    @MN5 Guys like big Jules , George North etc are all around 108/109 kgs.

    They're right in line with my theory that big is good in rugby. But, they're still 10kgs shy of Jonah - who was "bigger is better".

    But, since Jonah's day - everyone has got a bit bigger. Guys like Bunce, Goldie and Cully would be smallish these days.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to MN5 on last edited by sparky
    #61

    @MN5 Honiball here looks taller than Merts and Marshall, smaller than Jonah and Robin Brooke and about the same height as Josh Kronfeld so I suspect 1.85 isn't far out.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #62

    @No-Quarter said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    You guys are going to be kissing the boots of us Canes supporters when Jordie is awarded MOTM in the WC final.

    They won't be able to. They'll be too busy eating crow.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #63

    @sparky said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 Honiball here looks taller than Merts and Marshall, smaller than Jonah and Robin Brooke and about the same height as Michael Jones so I suspect 1.85 isn't far out.

    You mean the same Michael Jones who wasn't even playing in this footage ?

    great example.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to MN5 on last edited by sparky
    #64

    @MN5 Apologies, the open side was Josh Kronfeld who is also 1.85. But I am right about Honiball's height.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #65

    @sparky said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 Apologies, the open side was Josh Kronfeld who is also 1.85. But I am right about Honiball's height.

    Cool, the internet is always 100% accurate. I'm sorry I doubted you.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    It's a shame the Boy Child (Black) barely played for the Canes and was injured last year. We really don't have much to go on. He looks solid enough but test rugby and especially a RWC are an enormous step up.

    Based exclusively on the fact he has more experience, I think Banks should get the nod

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #67

    @Rancid-Schnitzel If it's about experience, I'd pick Mitch Hunt who has about the same number of NPC and SR caps as Banks. The only difference in experience between the two is Banks' overseas' stints for very average clubs. Hunt has played in two SR Finals (2017 & 2018), Banks in one (2015).

    KirwanK Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #68

    if its about experience pick Grant Fox, he'll be on tour anyway, plus he already knows all the drills, patterns etc.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.