• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
165 Posts 49 Posters 5.7k Views
Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to MN5 on last edited by Chester Draws
    #45

    @MN5 said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @canefan said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    Jordie is the my choice. You can joke about the charge downs but at the end of the day he has the quality and skills to fit in and do a decent job rather than hinder the players around him. He made a decent fist of his chances in black so far. And that us about all you can ask for if you get to the third stringer

    I don't think the charge downs would be a joke - they'd be the number one thing I would target.

    There's a reason most first fives are nippy little guys whose feet are close to their hands - because those extra hundredths of seconds it takes someone with long levers like Jordie - who is 20cm taller than people like DC and Mo'unga - to catch, drop and kick the ball are critical. And it's in the bio-mechanics of everything they do - they've got more power, but they take more time.

    Henry Honiball, Stephen Larkham, Jonathan Sexton, Steven Donald and Jordies shorter but still quite tall brother Beauden are reading this and getting pissed off at it's inaccuracy.

    Stephen Larkham was a fullback, pressed into 1st five out of necessity. It took quite a long time to get some aspects of the job right -- a luxury we won't have.

    I don't think it's bio-mechanics, it's more a matter of different positions requiring different types of kicks. Fullbacks are expected to be able to punt the ball long, and if they take a long run up and an age to do so there's no real drawback to that. First-fives are required to get the ball off quickly and often have stabby kicking styles to do so -- at the expense of distance.

    Leon MacDonald apparently was quite experienced at #10, so I'm told. But when forced to play at #10 for the ABs his years of fullback play became apparent -- he wasn't tall, but he had the slow kick of a fullback.

    Freaks like Henry Honiball who could play anywhere in a backline brilliantly aren't useful guides. We are looking at guys who clearly aren't close to being able to do that. If they could they'd already be starters.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #46

    @MN5 at best HH is 1.9m, at worst 1.85m...both still shorter than JB.

    Either way, JB isnt high on my list of players to play 10.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #47

    @No-Quarter I'd play Nonu at first five ahead of Jordie! ๐Ÿ™‚

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by Chester Draws
    #48

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @canefan said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    Jordie is the my choice. You can joke about the charge downs but at the end of the day he has the quality and skills to fit in and do a decent job rather than hinder the players around him. He made a decent fist of his chances in black so far. And that us about all you can ask for if you get to the third stringer

    I don't think the charge downs would be a joke - they'd be the number one thing I would target.

    There's a reason most first fives are nippy little guys whose feet are close to their hands - because those extra hundredths of seconds it takes someone with long levers like Jordie - who is 20cm taller than people like DC and Mo'unga - to catch, drop and kick the ball are critical. And it's in the bio-mechanics of everything they do - they've got more power, but they take more time.

    Henry Honiball, Stephen Larkham, Jonathan Sexton, Steven Donald and Jordies shorter but still quite tall brother Beauden are reading this and getting pissed off at it's inaccuracy.

    Yes.

    But, you'd think there would be huge advantages to having a first five who weighs 110kg compared to the 85kg lightweights who mainly occupy the position. The guys who get steam-rolled when the forwards drive close to the line. The guys like Mehrts and Cooper who get shifted out of the defensive line.

    And yet there aren't too many of these 110kg first fives.

    Why not?

    Because when you are at school level you have a little fellas who are mighty quick and nimble and deserve to be in the team. You also have big skilled guys. To get them both in, the small guys play halfback and first five and the bigger ones centre and fullback. That then tends to be the positions they play later.

    If you played your big skilled guys at first-five and halfback you'd be leaving out skilled players to do so, and few schools have that luxury.

    Given that there's ten little fellas for every genuinely big one, the overwhelming number of half-backs and first-fives are small just by weight of numbers going for that position. But that doesn't mean you need to be to play those positions.

    I've seen enormous half-backs (Junior Tonu'u's brother, for example, was a halfback and easily mistaken for prop) and very tall first-fives.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #49

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @No-Quarter I'd play Nonu at first five ahead of Jordie! ๐Ÿ™‚

    Nonu is short and actually has a decent boot on him. Think we're on to something here.

    JKJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    I went for Ioane, 3 Ioaneโ€™s in a team are unstoppable.

    And I thought he went alright last year.

    And all the options are shit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Darren
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    I like JB, but I think it's 50/50 that he will cost us a game.
    Even if his kick is a little slow, there is always a chance he would throw an intercept pass. I'd be fine if he was playing a game against a minnow, but I'd have no fingernails if used at 10 in a real test.
    I would play for 3rd string whoever has the least chance to f it up. I'm thinking Black.
    Just has to distribute without an intercept and kick ok.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #52

    @Chester-Draws There is certainly some truth to that.

    But, in a physical game like rugby, size is going to be an advantage in every position - everything else being equal. And yet these huge players don't emerge as elite halfbacks and first fives - when they've got that initial size advantage. So there must be other factors working against them.

    I think there's probably a corollary with Jonah Lomu. Everyone saw the massive advantage that a 118kg wing could give a team - but, subsequently wings that size have been scarce as hens' teeth - because at the end of the day, there's very few 118 kg guys who can run fast enough to play on the wing.

    Very few big guys with the deftness to play in the inside backs.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #53

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @Chester-Draws There is certainly some truth to that.

    But, in a physical game like rugby, size is going to be an advantage in every position - everything else being equal. And yet these huge players don't emerge as elite halfbacks and first fives - when they've got that initial size advantage. So there must be other factors working against them.

    I think there's probably a corollary with Jonah Lomu. Everyone saw the massive advantage that a 118kg wing could give a team - but, subsequently wings that size have been scarce as hens' teeth - because at the end of the day, there's very few 118 kg guys who can run fast enough to play on the wing.

    Very few big guys with the deftness to play in the inside backs.

    These days there's heaps actually.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #54

    @MN5 There's Nemani Nadolo. Remind me of some others.

    MN5M NepiaN rotatedR 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by MN5
    #55

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 There's Nemani Nadolo. Remind me of some others.

    What's the cut off ? Some of these guys are pretty close in weight......

    George North, Tim Visser, English guy Joe whatever, Matt Banahan, Nikki Walker, Julian Savea, one or two of the Tuilagis.....

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #56

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 There's Nemani Nadolo. Remind me of some others.

    That fat Fijian wing who plays for the Wallabies must be pushing close to that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #57

    @Chris-B said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 There's Nemani Nadolo. Remind me of some others.

    I would need to see a graph with Caucau's playing ability and weight to see where they intersect before offering him up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to MN5 on last edited by sparky
    #58

    @MN5 Honiball was the guy I thought of when I was trying to imagine the best case scenario for Jordie at 10. Henry Honiball was 1.85 tall, Jordie Barrett is 1.96.

    I think you could have Jordie at 10 against Canada or Namibia, but you would probably have the half back doing all the clearance kicks.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #59

    @sparky said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 Honiball was the guy I thought of when I was trying to imagine the best case scenario for Jordie at 10. Henry Honiball was 1.85 tall, Jordie Barrett is 1.96.

    I think you could have Jordie at 10 against Canada or Namibia, but you would probably have the half back doing all the clearance kicks.

    It's not boxing.

    Rugby stats can be wildly inaccurate. Adam Thomson was heavier than Jerome Kaino apparently.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #60

    @MN5 Guys like big Jules , George North etc are all around 108/109 kgs.

    They're right in line with my theory that big is good in rugby. But, they're still 10kgs shy of Jonah - who was "bigger is better".

    But, since Jonah's day - everyone has got a bit bigger. Guys like Bunce, Goldie and Cully would be smallish these days.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to MN5 on last edited by sparky
    #61

    @MN5 Honiball here looks taller than Merts and Marshall, smaller than Jonah and Robin Brooke and about the same height as Josh Kronfeld so I suspect 1.85 isn't far out.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #62

    @No-Quarter said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    You guys are going to be kissing the boots of us Canes supporters when Jordie is awarded MOTM in the WC final.

    They won't be able to. They'll be too busy eating crow.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #63

    @sparky said in Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth:

    @MN5 Honiball here looks taller than Merts and Marshall, smaller than Jonah and Robin Brooke and about the same height as Michael Jones so I suspect 1.85 isn't far out.

    You mean the same Michael Jones who wasn't even playing in this footage ?

    great example.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to MN5 on last edited by sparky
    #64

    @MN5 Apologies, the open side was Josh Kronfeld who is also 1.85. But I am right about Honiball's height.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Poll: ABs new First Five-Eighth
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.