CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan
-
@Siam said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 from what I've seen, it's been excellent, very tidy and energetic and the fielding in general has been impressive. These things are linked
Hmmmm so the selectors see a problem with him opening and keeping despite others have done it successfully in the past then.
but hten again I guess this is the old cliche "good problem to have"
-
@MN5 I'm sure his keeping has been fine, but Latham was going OK as our ODI opener until he got asked to keep as well (and even captain if I recall rightly) and his form fell off a cliff. So I don't think he should be asked to do both jobs.
You'd expect Tom will get some time in the middle in the next three games and it will be about at that point they'll potentially decide again that a change is needed at the top.
-
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot. -
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot.I know, forget the seven wickets he's taken previously. He's shit.
-
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot.I know, forget the seven wickets he's taken previously. He's shit.
Neesham took 5 in this game alone you must think he is an elite world class bowler..
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot.I know, forget the seven wickets he's taken previously. He's shit.
Neesham took 5 in this game alone you must think he is an elite world class bowler..
Definitely not although it's still a wonderful achievement.
Henry has a spot in the team. Like it or not.
-
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot.I know, forget the seven wickets he's taken previously. He's shit.
Neesham took 5 in this game alone you must think he is an elite world class bowler..
Definitely not although it's still a wonderful achievement.
Henry has a spot in the team. Like it or not.
Great argument. He has a spot in team so should not be dropped... genius.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot.I know, forget the seven wickets he's taken previously. He's shit.
Neesham took 5 in this game alone you must think he is an elite world class bowler..
Definitely not although it's still a wonderful achievement.
Henry has a spot in the team. Like it or not.
Great argument. He has a spot in team so should not be dropped... genius.
Well certainly not on the back of one lackluster performance, no. Otherwise we'll be getting rid of Boult too.
But you can always console yourself with the thought that Southee may have done better.
-
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot.I know, forget the seven wickets he's taken previously. He's shit.
Neesham took 5 in this game alone you must think he is an elite world class bowler..
Definitely not although it's still a wonderful achievement.
Henry has a spot in the team. Like it or not.
Great argument. He has a spot in team so should not be dropped... genius.
Well certainly not on the back of one lackluster performance, no. Otherwise we'll be getting rid of Boult too.
But you can always console yourself with the thought that Southee may have done better.
One lacklustre. He is nearly always lacklustre. This game was just more evidence of the point I made about Henry before the game.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot.I know, forget the seven wickets he's taken previously. He's shit.
Neesham took 5 in this game alone you must think he is an elite world class bowler..
Definitely not although it's still a wonderful achievement.
Henry has a spot in the team. Like it or not.
Great argument. He has a spot in team so should not be dropped... genius.
Well certainly not on the back of one lackluster performance, no. Otherwise we'll be getting rid of Boult too.
But you can always console yourself with the thought that Southee may have done better.
One lacklustre. He is nearly always lacklustre. This game was just more evidence of the point I made about Henry before the game.
He get's a few wickets for someone so lackluster. I guess he's just really, really lucky. A lot of the time.
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot.I know, forget the seven wickets he's taken previously. He's shit.
Neesham took 5 in this game alone you must think he is an elite world class bowler..
Definitely not although it's still a wonderful achievement.
Henry has a spot in the team. Like it or not.
Great argument. He has a spot in team so should not be dropped... genius.
Well certainly not on the back of one lackluster performance, no. Otherwise we'll be getting rid of Boult too.
But you can always console yourself with the thought that Southee may have done better.
One lacklustre. He is nearly always lacklustre. This game was just more evidence of the point I made about Henry before the game.
Southee has been lackluster for years though. I prefer Henry based on current ability.
-
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@MN5 said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback said in CWC Game #3 Black Caps vs Afghanistan:
Henry at 8 overs for 50. Bowling at the best possible time.
Bloody waste of a bowling spot.I know, forget the seven wickets he's taken previously. He's shit.
Neesham took 5 in this game alone you must think he is an elite world class bowler..
Definitely not although it's still a wonderful achievement.
Henry has a spot in the team. Like it or not.
Great argument. He has a spot in team so should not be dropped... genius.
Well certainly not on the back of one lackluster performance, no. Otherwise we'll be getting rid of Boult too.
But you can always console yourself with the thought that Southee may have done better.
One lacklustre. He is nearly always lacklustre. This game was just more evidence of the point I made about Henry before the game.
He get's a few wickets for someone so lackluster. I guess he's just really, really lucky. A lot of the time.
What current ability? The ability to only bowl at the best times to bowl or the ability to bowl pies?
-
This post is deleted!
Stuff