• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket: NZ vs Aus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.4k Posts 62 Posters 106.2k Views
Cricket: NZ vs Aus
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #511

    @mariner4life said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @Chris-B exactly. 5th is right given the dogshit teams tehy were putting out when their best batsmen were suspended, and they had to rotate their top 3 bowlers.

    Now though? And at home? 5th is a joke.

    So we are the poor schmucks that have to suffer the brunt

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #512

    @mariner4life Exactly!

    That current bowling attack is possibly the best they've had since Lillee and Thommo - it's at least equal to McGrath, Warne and Co. - especially on a pitch like Perth.

    I'm doubtful anyone would have fared better than us in the first innings in Perth against that bowling. Maybe India if their openers had hung around longer to provide a bit of protection for Kohli.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #513

    @canefan said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    Our batsmen need to show a shitload more discipline and application in Melbourne. I still can't understand why Ajaz wasn't considered, he would have rocked it on that deck. Not quite as shocking as omitting Sam Cane, but so much has to go our way to win without us shooting ourselves in the foot

    But is Cane an opener?

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to booboo on last edited by Gunner
    #514

    @booboo I reckon he'd show better form than Raval

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #515

    Test match cricket is basically a question of whether or not you can win away from home. You need a few things to go your way when playing here, let alone in Perth in sweltering conditions and in form Aussie seamers. These aren’t excuses, just the reality.

    Given MCG conditions are likely to be quite different I think they will stick with the current openers.

    When I look at our squad overall I’m not seeing a whole lot of ‘pick me, I demand it” from those that sat on the sidelines in Perth.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #516

    So Lockie has come home. Do we replace him with:

    Another pace bowler?
    A spinner?
    An opening batsman?

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #517

    @Chris-B Lockie is interesting. Another NZ fast bowler who is short and bowling at the limitations of his body. Aside from breaking down he didn't have the control to be demanding at this level of cricket. Test cricket is the form of cricket that finds players out.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #518

    @kev Yeah.

    I guess to be fair, it was his debut test and he was potentially trying too hard (maybe hence the injury).

    Worth more cracks, I think - but, I'm pretty mystified as to why they picked Matt Henry ahead of him in Hamilton. A 1-0 lead in a series that didn't count for the WTC - better place to blood him than in the hotbed of Perth.

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #519

    @Chris-B agree, he needs to work on control for the future. I fear he will join the long list of NZ fasts that are promising that break down.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #520

    @kev One good thing about Lockie is that he's a bit older (28) and I've read that makes a difference with injuries compared to really young guys who are pretty much still growing - up till about 24.

    And it's not a back injury that has got him.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #521

    Kyle Jamieson called up. A century batting at 8 vs England... my instinctive reaction was to wonder whether he could open vs Australia/do worse than the incumbent 🙂

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/black-caps/118247130/australia-vs-new-zealand-kyle-jamieson-summoned-to-black-caps-test-squad#comments

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by Chris B.
    #522

    @Donsteppa Interesting!

    I guess there's very little chance of Jamieson playing, because Matt Henry is surely ahead of him in the queue and Henry surely won't play unless Boult (or one of the other seamers) isn't fit.

    Jamieson might be handy in the nets though, because he's about the same height as Starc (even taller, I think) - unfortunately, last time I saw him his pace was more like CdG's!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #523

    Isnt there a 2 day game vs Victoria coming up?

    Be interesting which bowlers play in that one given workload and injury.

    Chris B.C ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #524

    @KiwiMurph I'd guess all of Southee, Wagner and de Grandhomme will sit it out.

    Be interesting to see who opens the batting - I'd be somewhat inclined to go with Raval and whomever his potential replacement would be - Blundell, Nicholls or BJ.

    Tom Latham could bat at 5.

    CyclopsC canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #525

    Whats Jordie Barrett up to at the moment...?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #526

    @KiwiMurph said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    Isnt there a 2 day game vs Victoria coming up?

    Be interesting which bowlers play in that one given workload and injury.

    I’ve seen this reported but have had no luck finding out where this is being played.

    nzzpN canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #527

    @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @KiwiMurph I'd guess all of Southee, Wagner and de Grandhomme will sit it out.

    Be interesting to see who opens the batting - I'd be somewhat inclined to go with Raval and whomever his potential replacement would be - Blundell, Nicholls or BJ.

    Tom Latham could bat at 5.

    Seems to be the best approach. Feels like it's our batsmen that need the most work so watch as we lose the toss and spend a day and a half in the field.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #528

    @Chris-B BJ should stay where he is

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #529

    @ACT-Crusader said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @KiwiMurph said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    Isnt there a 2 day game vs Victoria coming up?

    Be interesting which bowlers play in that one given workload and injury.

    I’ve seen this reported but have had no luck finding out where this is being played.

    yeah, weird Cricinfo doesn't have it

    ... and just checked NZC - they don't have it either. Suggest you email them; i'm sure they'll give you the inf you need

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #530

    @ACT-Crusader said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @KiwiMurph said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    Isnt there a 2 day game vs Victoria coming up?

    Be interesting which bowlers play in that one given workload and injury.

    I’ve seen this reported but have had no luck finding out where this is being played.

    If you are nearby perhaps you could pop in and drop something off for the players

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Cricket: NZ vs Aus
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.