Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures
-
@Rapido said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
But Shute shield still does.
*IF you are someone associated with one of those clubs. Some of the Shute Shield clubs number membership in the hundreds and the top ones only a few thousand.
If you play park footy - Suburban Rugby - you've maybe got a slight interest toward the local Premier Club, but more often you're in conflict with them - competing for players, mostly. And they're poorly run buckets of shit who piss and moan that they don't get massive handouts. My club kicks off at the same time as First Grade.
As with NRC not capturing the imagination (of Sydney Premier Rugby, really), the Shute Shield system will not capture the imagination of people outside those clubs.
BUT they have grounds, history, junior feeders, and a tantrum about playing in a national comp and getting those sweet, sweet subsidies so they can continue to buy trophies.
So fuck it, give them a crack.
-
Yeah. I'm just putting forward a structure, in my case 11 teams. 5 rounds each weekend. 1 bye
I'm not trying to argue the actual teams. Although I say with Australia $16m in debt and losing $9m a year. They can't bankroll a new competition with new 'amalgamated' or made up teams that need subsidising and marketing. It would need to be based on existing infrastructure, so based on existing Sydney and Brisbane club teams with the Rebels and Brumbies.
Hell, I've totally forgotten about the Force. They'd be allowed in if they changed their name to a grown-up name. So, 12 teams. I doubt Twiggy will be as interested if Force is domestic rather than Asia-Pacific?
-
@antipodean said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Rapido Wests have been terrible for a long time. The unis are considerably more competitive. Canberra won the Brisbane premier grade three years running and that was the end of their involvement. Sydney club rugby is much stronger than Brisbane. The Shute Shield is normally a case of someone contesting Syd Uni.
I just see University clubs as being too narrow, and the links between the individual and club forming too late in life to be a structure that would work for professional sport. GPS and Brothers may be narrow too, but links formed earlier, and often familial.
Although in South American football, "Universtario" etc are big clubs in places like Chile.
-
@Rapido said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@antipodean said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Rapido Wests have been terrible for a long time. The unis are considerably more competitive. Canberra won the Brisbane premier grade three years running and that was the end of their involvement. Sydney club rugby is much stronger than Brisbane. The Shute Shield is normally a case of someone contesting Syd Uni.
I just see University clubs as being too narrow, and the links between the individual and club forming too late in life to be a structure that would work for professional sport. GPS and Brothers may be narrow too, but links formed earlier, and often familial.
Although in South American football, "Universtario" etc are big clubs in places like Chile.
Unis in the Brisbane comp have (or are) merging with junior established rugby clubs in their vicinity.
-
Touch rugby up north!
Non-contact rugby could be the short-term solution in England
Plans are being drawn up for rugby union in England to be played without scrummaging, tackling and mauling next season to increase the likelihood of some form of the game returning if the Covid-19 lockdown is eased.
-
@Rapido I don't see too much need for change in NZ's domestic rugby structures. You could merge a few NPC teams - Otago and Southland are the obvious ones at present. Harbour and Northland has a reasonable case. And Manawatu and Hawkes Bay should have happened years ago!
A Canterbury- Ta$man merger/takeover has no logic in the current environment.
I reckon Super rugby is going to continue pretty much as scheduled once we get on top of CV.
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Let's see if he's willing to rein in his rich mates or if he's a useless c#nt!
-
@Chris-B genuine question, why shouldn't they buy players if they can?
-
@mariner4life Because what is in an individual club's interests is not necessarily in the interests of world rugby.
Just because I can afford to buy Lake Taupo and use it to store bleach, doesn't mean I should be allowed to.
-
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
And Manawatu and Hawkes Bay should have happened years ago!
Just because Malborough and Nelson Bays made an unholy alliance doesn't mean we all have to ... plus I'd rather not go down your invitational XV route.
-
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Covid's going to do more about that than Bill can.
-
@nzzp said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Covid's going to do more about that than Bill can.
Maybe - but, usually the rich come out of these things better than what the poor do.
-
@Nepia said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
And Manawatu and Hawkes Bay should have happened years ago!
Just because Malborough and Nelson Bays made an unholy alliance doesn't mean we all have to ... plus I'd rather not go down your invitational XV route.
Unholy Alliance???
God is with us - it says so on our Cup!
-
@nzzp It seems some teams still have quite a bit of cash to play around with.
REPORT: PSDT offered €3.6million deal to leave Stormers
Reports emerging from South Africa this weekend suggest Stormers face a pitched battle to keep Pieter Steph du Toit (PSDT).
-
@Dice bloody hell, that's incredible.
and at about Rand73M, I don't think there's any way for SA to compete.
Just googled, and no, there's no way. The ENTIRE WAGE BILL of Western Province is R78M. So he's earning as much as 128 contracted players (over three years).
Anyone still think SA won't have their player stocks decimated again? Especially if you can keep playing for SA if you want to?
Revealed: Here's what professional rugby players earn in SA each year
If you've got the skills, you can almost certainly pay the bills. Rugby players in Mzansi tend to make a mint, but not everyone is spoilt with riches.
-
Maybe it's just agent bullshit, in covid denial.
-
@nzzp said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Covid's going to do more about that than Bill can.
Debatable. Unless of course you prescribe to the theory in the stuff column that Auckland is now a much better place to do business than London or New York.
-
@MajorRage said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@nzzp said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
@Chris-B said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
What fucking Bill Beaumont really needs to focus on is stopping the Northern Hemisphere looting the Southern Hemisphere with its sugar-daddy cash.
Covid's going to do more about that than Bill can.
Debatable. Unless of course you prescribe to the theory in the stuff column that Auckland is now a much better place to do business than London or New York.
The reason I think it'll be better for NZ is that it probably hits a couple of points.
Firstly, if economic times are tougher, a number of owners are less likely to pump money into clubs, and youd' then expect player salaries will drop. I can see TV rights dropping as well, as there won't be as much cash to splash around. NZ will suffer as well, but probably not as much as the club salaries up north.
Secondly, the 'lifestyle' reasons for living NH/SH will change. The perception of safety and security for living in NZ compared to overseas changes
I think that will tip the balances at the fringe. Reduced reward, less benefit, and suddenly the attraction of heading north won't be quite as strong. I may be totally wrong, but I think it's a pretty credible situation.
-
@nzzp It's credible, but given what's happening, it seems unlikely that SH salaries won't drop as well.
For what it's worth, I'm not speaking from a position of hope. Despite living up here, I have no real interest in rugby in this country (for lots of different reasons) but I'll still watch super rugby. Al So much better for me if the best NZ players are down there than up here.
Hard to know if you are right on the lifestyle reasons. On the outside yes. But I know when I was 22 I was desperate to get out and see the big wide world. I think that still holds true, as it doesn't matter what growth / attraction NZ gets out of this (if you read stuff, it's going to be AMAZING), NZ location wise is still the arse end of nowhere and it's difficult to get out and see the world from - these things are pretty important in you 20's.
Don't get me wrong, I sure as fuck wouldn't recommend coming here right now and I have no idea how long that will last for. My homesickness for NZ is the worst it's ever been right now.
But reality is that if NZ GDP goes up 5 fold, and UK drops 50%, it'll still be twice as large up here than in NZ. Similar in France too.
-
@MajorRage said in Post-Apocalyptic Rugby Structures:
But reality is that if NZ GDP goes up 5 fold, and UK drops 50%, it'll still be twice as large up here than in NZ. Similar in France too.
ah, absolutely - but we're talking about the narrow world of elite professional sportspeople. Their salaries are determined by their quality, competing offers, and available money.
I think the money available will drop, and that people will be less inclined to prop up clubs. I'm not a millionaire with a vanity project, but this recession could be deep and ugly in some parts of the economy.
I also hear ya on the OE experience thing, but it's typically mid career players we lose, with a few years of pro rugby on the clock. They go north to set up their family for post-rugby. If there's not enough money to do that, and it's perceived to be 'risky', then I certainly see that as a 'double whammy'
will be interesting. Sorry to hear you're homesick, can we send you some proper marmite?
-
@MajorRage this got posted in Rugby Finances thread - interesting to say the least!
Harrington column: Top 14 in turmoil with no option to cut player wages
It has been estimated the Top 14 will lose up to €100m (£88m) if the season was cancelled
