• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hurricanes v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
hurricanescrusaders
293 Posts 47 Posters 4.5k Views
Hurricanes v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #77

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Crusaders are usually slow starters.

    Just trying to keep the thread interesting....

    How many Hurricanes would you pick in a combined team?

    MachpantsM ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #78

    @Bones said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Crusaders are usually slow starters.

    Just trying to keep the thread interesting....

    How many Hurricanes would you pick in a combined team?

    TJ, Ardie, and Aumua on the bench.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #79

    IWL. He and Whitelock could make a very complementary second row.

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #80

    @cgrant said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    IWL. He and Whitelock could make a very complementary second row.

    Not playing

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #81

    @Machpants said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @Bones said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Crusaders are usually slow starters.

    Just trying to keep the thread interesting....

    How many Hurricanes would you pick in a combined team?

    TJ, Ardie, and Aumua on the bench.

    I wasn't really serious as it was ACT but hey, where's Lomax? Ingrate.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #82

    @nzzp said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @Winger said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @nzzp said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @Winger delete Canes, replace with Blues, it's pretty familiar 🙂 Welcome to our world of the last few years. It sucks. No-one has a monopoly on competence, we should expect every franchise to be well run and effective (noting you won't always win)

    Thank God the Blues have finally sorted things out. It seems to have happened after Board and management changes. And that's where it needs to start with the Canes.

    Otherwise we will be lucky to hold onto Jordie. Or a great first 5.

    You guys have been the production line of 10s.

    Cruden
    Barrett
    Black
    Sopoaga

    Remarkable-and none are playing for you! Crazy times

    Falcon
    Perofeta

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #83

    @Stargazer said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Hurricanes

    1 Fraser Armstrong
    2 Dane Coles [cc]
    3 Tyrel Lomax
    4 James Blackwell
    5 Vaea Fifita
    6 Reed Prinsep
    7 Du’Plessis Kirifi
    8 Ardie Savea
    9 TJ Perenara [cc]
    10 Jackson Garden-Bachop
    11 Ben Lam
    12 Ngani Laumape
    13 Vince Aso
    14 Wes Goosen
    15 Chase Tiatia

    REPLACEMENTS:
    16 Asafo Aumua
    17 Ben May
    18 Alex Fidow
    19 Scott Scrafton
    20 Gareth Evans
    21 Jamie Booth
    22 Billy Proctor
    23 Kobus Van Wyk

    Hurricanes name squad to face Crusaders at Sky Stadium

    Hurricanes name squad to face Crusaders at Sky Stadium

    Fuck. Going to pick any forwards? Lightweight.

    Is there s published injury list? IWL? Flanders?

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by booboo
    #84

    @Canes4life said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @Duluth yes he was, Prinsep got smoked every time he ran it forward.

    The coaches seem happy with plodder forwards but it won't win us games.

    Looks to me he hasn't gone for plodders he's gone for mobility. Not sure you want to sacrifice a strong forward pack against the Evil Empire. Basically conceded the forward battle to contest it wider.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DiceD Offline
    DiceD Offline
    Dice
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    Heard on the news last night that the Crusaders haven't conceded a try from a maul in 3 years. Crazy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to booboo on last edited by Stargazer
    #86

    @booboo said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Is there s published injury list? IWL? Flanders?

    No, the Canes never seem to publish an injury list, unfortunately. And since Hamish Bidwell left stuff and doesn't report on the Canes anymore, we don't get the info via the media anymore, either. I'm not a fan of Bidwell as a journo, but amidst the rubbish, he managed to include some useful facts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    It may only be the first round for the Crusaders, but Whitelock's NZ comeback game should be a point of interest. Hope he looks refreshed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #88

    Will thet let u in the stadium if u don't have the covid tracer app?

    The fucking 6 digit code us not coming through, can't sign in.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #89

    @Bones said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Crusaders are usually slow starters.

    Just trying to keep the thread interesting....

    How many Hurricanes would you pick in a combined team?

    I wouldn’t pick any Barrett’s in a combined Hurricanes / Crusaders side 😎

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #90

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @Bones said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Crusaders are usually slow starters.

    Just trying to keep the thread interesting....

    How many Hurricanes would you pick in a combined team?

    I wouldn’t pick any Barrett’s in a combined Hurricanes / Crusaders side 😎

    Blackwell over SB I assume?

    ChrisC MachpantsM 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    So I'm thinking about rolling my winnings tonight on the Blues in to the Canes.

    That makes sense right?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #92

    @Nepia said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @Bones said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Crusaders are usually slow starters.

    Just trying to keep the thread interesting....

    How many Hurricanes would you pick in a combined team?

    I wouldn’t pick any Barrett’s in a combined Hurricanes / Crusaders side 😎

    Blackwell over SB I assume?

    Haha haha

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #93

    @Nepia said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @Bones said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Crusaders are usually slow starters.

    Just trying to keep the thread interesting....

    How many Hurricanes would you pick in a combined team?

    I wouldn’t pick any Barrett’s in a combined Hurricanes / Crusaders side 😎

    Blackwell over SB I assume?

    Yeah makes sense for the terminally biased against Barretts

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #94

    @Machpants said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @Nepia said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @Bones said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Crusaders are usually slow starters.

    Just trying to keep the thread interesting....

    How many Hurricanes would you pick in a combined team?

    I wouldn’t pick any Barrett’s in a combined Hurricanes / Crusaders side 😎

    Blackwell over SB I assume?

    Yeah makes sense for the terminally biased against Barretts

    ACT is biased against the Barrett’s?

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #95

    @Nepia Must be. SB is a great lock, and all black lock, and on a different planet than any Canes lock. Jordie Barret is a an all black, multi position player - and (despite brain farts) is still better than the majority of backs in NZ. ACT is saying he wouldn't pick either of them in a combined canes/dockers team - no way you've got to be terminally biased to not pick those that are 1st/ almost 1st choice ABs. They are great players at SR level.

    This seems a consistant thing in hardcore rugby supporters. A player fucks up or is not upto McCaw levels of awesomeness when they are in the ABs, so they are therefore utter shit and shouldn't be picked for their province, let alone SR team. Or they play in a style that does not suit the fans preconceived ideas of that position. For Ex Ardie (AB PotY and WR PotY nominee) is often not included in many fans current ABs XV ATM. Thankfully the coaches are not as short sighted. All the Barret boys are awesome, Scott has the problem he is behind two of our greatest in the ABs. But to say that Jordie and Scott are not good enough to be in a combined Canes/Dockers XV is ridiculous.

    BonesB NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #96

    @Machpants I reckon ACT was dead serious too.

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Hurricanes v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
hurricanescrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.