• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiaargentina
246 Posts 43 Posters 9.5k Views
Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #191

    @mariner4life the Wallabies are world class at disappointing. fluffybunnies just squirt disappointment juice on any person who comes in any kind of contact with em.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #192

    Bloody good effort from Argentina.

    4 tests in 4 weeks.

    1 win 1 loss 2 draws.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #193

    @Stargazer said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    a401312f-5e68-406f-9166-7f34759066df-image.png

    All square on match points.

    Had Argies won that their record of two wins and a draw would have been the best. Ditto for Oz.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #194

    @Stargazer said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    @KiwiMurph said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    Aboriginal verse with the players singing - awesome.

    That is, quite frankly, awesome!

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    wrote on last edited by
    #195

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #196

    @voodoo

    Rennie tried things. Most failed, but he is at least armed with some idea where he can build and where he can't. I reckon he will go away and come back next year a lot stronger. If nothing else, he will have some strategy to break the Pumas defence.

    Foster tried nothing this year. So next year he will be exactly where he is now -- with no plan and uncertain about who to pick.

    voodooV ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #197

    @Chester-Draws said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    @voodoo

    Rennie tried things. Most failed, but he is at least armed with some idea where he can build and where he can't. I reckon he will go away and come back next year a lot stronger. If nothing else, he will have some strategy to break the Pumas defence.

    Foster tried nothing this year. So next year he will be exactly where he is now -- with no plan and uncertain about who to pick.

    He did try some things. I'm not saying he's been a disaster. But the Wallabies have put out 2 pretty turgid performances against Argentina in a row, and they finished last in the Rugby Championship. I dont know that he learned a whole lot more about his side, maybe he did.

    But its certainly not worth of the praise they were dishing out last night

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #198

    @Chester-Draws said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    @voodoo

    Rennie tried things. Most failed, but he is at least armed with some idea where he can build and where he can't. I reckon he will go away and come back next year a lot stronger. If nothing else, he will have some strategy to break the Pumas defence.

    Foster tried nothing this year. So next year he will be exactly where he is now -- with no plan and uncertain about who to pick.

    I know it’s fashionable to knock Foster, but from my armchair he tried a number of new things and blooded new players that now have test experience. In a compressed schedule that was very different to anything in the last 20 years, I think there were quite a few things that became far more certain.

    Rennie has a lot of question marks over his squad I reckon with many young players and a few guys ‘hanging on’.

    Chester DrawsC 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #199

    I didn't watch this game but I read that Gardner was the ref. He was originally meant to be the TMO. Did they say why O'Keeffe didn't officiate? Maybe both NZ refs had already left as all the officials were Aussies.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by Siam
    #200

    Incredible rain but even more alarming was the lack of any tactical wet weather rugby.
    Argies could have held there league by simply kicking for territory.
    Neither team consistently put the ball behind the opposition, but rather we watched a game of running rugby with a big bar of soap. Thought it was all a bit strange, but quite a compelling game never the less

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester DrawsC Offline
    Chester Draws
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #201

    @ACT-Crusader said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    I know it’s fashionable to knock Foster, but from my armchair he tried a number of new things and blooded new players that now have test experience. In a compressed schedule that was very different to anything in the last 20 years, I think there were quite a few things that became far more certain.

    Rennie has a lot of question marks over his squad I reckon with many young players and a few guys ‘hanging on’.

    Really? How many ABs are currently lock-in certainties: Cane, Sam Whitelock, Aaron Smith. Plus some others but we can't say which position they will be in: Ardie Savea, Beauden Barrett, Caleb Clarke, ALB and Goodhue or which one will start and which will be reserve: props and hookers, Jordie Barrett. I reckon things have got way less certain, and not in a good way.

    I'd be intrigued for you to tell me what our offensive strategies are, because carting it up or hoofing it seem to be about all we have.

    Foster has this ability to exude confidence, while completely out of his depth. How quickly we forget how rabble like we were in the middle of the season: those two turnover tries went the other way in the last Argentinian game and he was out of a job. Gone burger.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Chester Draws on last edited by
    #202

    @Chester-Draws those two Jordan tries were the result of scoreboard pressure forcing the Argentinians to play. Besides - ABs were up 17-0 before the first one so your maths doesn't add up.

    pukunuiP nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #203

    @KiwiMurph said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    @Chester-Draws those two Jordan tries were the result of scoreboard pressure forcing the Argentinians to play. Besides - ABs were up 17-0 before the first one so your maths doesn't add up.

    A scoreboard that should have had 20 more points on it given the amount of possession and territory the ABs had up to that point.
    Don’t underestimate the ability of this ABs team to shit itself and lose the game if the Argies had cut that lead down to 3.

    I don’t think Foster should be given any credit for those Jordan tries that sealed the game. They should be seen as an indictment on his selection policy through the season which meant Jordan was barely on the field until the very end.

    nostrildamusN ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    wrote on last edited by
    #204

    Never seen two teams so excited for a draw
    Did Nic White try and milk a penalty/card when he ran into the puma hooker?

    Thought the cards were deserved

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #205

    @Stargazer said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    a401312f-5e68-406f-9166-7f34759066df-image.png

    looking at that table in hindsight it really looks like a toilet squabble behind the disableds (insert appropriate Simon Pegg-World's End quote here).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to pukunui on last edited by nostrildamus
    #206

    @Chester-Draws said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    I know it’s fashionable to knock Foster, but from my armchair he tried a number of new things and blooded new players that now have test experience. In a compressed schedule that was very different to anything in the last 20 years, I think there were quite a few things that became far more certain.

    Rennie has a lot of question marks over his squad I reckon with many young players and a few guys ‘hanging on’.

    Really? How many ABs are currently lock-in certainties: Cane, Sam Whitelock, Aaron Smith. Plus some others but we can't say which position they will be in: Ardie Savea, Beauden Barrett, Caleb Clarke, ALB and Goodhue or which one will start and which will be reserve: props and hookers, Jordie Barrett. I reckon things have got way less certain, and not in a good way.

    I'd be intrigued for you to tell me what our offensive strategies are, because carting it up or hoofing it seem to be about all we have.

    Foster has this ability to exude confidence, while completely out of his depth. How quickly we forget how rabble like we were in the middle of the season: those two turnover tries went the other way in the last Argentinian game and he was out of a job. Gone burger.

    Saved by the Slither of Jordan.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #207

    @KiwiMurph "those two Jordan tries were the result of scoreboard pressure forcing the Argentinians to play"
    yes completely calculated. That is why they have JB on the wing there. No tin-arsed opportunistic luck at all. Totally planned. Wait until the last minute when the Argies actually pass the ball in reach of our flukiest player (sorry BB) who just came off the bench for a bit of a warmup. Sheer tactical genius.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #208

    @pukunui heading into the tests I certainly didn’t think Jordan was the answer for the right wing. He was exposed defensively on the wing for the Saders. He’s got time to keep developing though.

    pukunuiP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #209

    @ACT-Crusader said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    @pukunui heading into the tests I certainly didn’t think Jordan was the answer for the right wing. He was exposed defensively on the wing for the Saders. He’s got time to keep developing though.

    It’s not about him being “the answer” from the start. It is about giving the best outside back in Super rugby a decent opportunity earlier in the series. Having Jordie as the undroppable/unrotatable selection at 14 meant Jordan never got the chance to show that maybe he WAS “the answer”.

    Im yet to see any evidence of the whole getting exposed on the wing thing. Especially when compared to any other option for the outside back. They all had defensive lapses in Super rugby. BB probably the worst.

    Wrong thread for this discussion really.

    nzzpN BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #210

    @pukunui said in Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th:

    Wrong thread for this discussion really.

    So, back on the game - are we getting into silly card fests now? I saw the Red, looked a very clear red under the current laws. That said, it doesn't make a game for the viewer when so many game affecting decisions get made.

    Anyone got thoughts on it who actually suffered through the match? @NTA now we're 24 horus on?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Wallabies v Argentina Take 2, Dec 5th
Rugby Matches
australiaargentina
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.