• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
575 Posts 61 Posters 33.8k Views
SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Frank on last edited by
    #179

    @frank said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Havili is a cut above.
    Definite All Black.

    Ive never seen him under huge pressure - he gets a sweet ride in this team, so there are still some question marks.

    I’d pick him, but statistically this is 1st versus 5th.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #180

    @nepia shouldn't have even got there, scrum penalty before

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #181

    Oh good. Chiefs penalised for not rolling away when nankivell gets genuinely trapped. No favouritism to see here...

    gt12G MachpantsM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #182

    A few more missed tackles than normal

    final defense.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #183

    @bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Oh good. Chiefs penalised for not rolling away when nankivell gets genuinely trapped. No favouritism to see here...

    He didn’t make any effort.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #184

    @bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Oh good. Chiefs penalised for not rolling away when nankivell gets genuinely trapped. No favouritism to see here...

    Genuinely trapped = shouldn't have got himself into that position in the first place.

    Been like that for years

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #185

    ENS having a mare

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #186

    @machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Oh good. Chiefs penalised for not rolling away when nankivell gets genuinely trapped. No favouritism to see here...

    Genuinely trapped = shouldn't have got himself into that position in the first place.

    Been like that for years

    Now you're getting it. Look at all those penalties against the crusaders...

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #187

    @bones and?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #188

    @kiwimurph said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    ENS having a mare

    He’s not up to it.

    He’s a hot stepper but just not good enough.

    I’m sad about that as we’ve invested a lot in him, but he won’t be an AB. We should look for better options.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #189

    @gt12 said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @frank said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Havili is a cut above.
    Definite All Black.

    Ive never seen him under huge pressure - he gets a sweet ride in this team, so there are still some question marks.

    Fake news.

    You still have to perform on both sides of the ball. Given he has been critical for us in what has been a mixed bag season.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #190

    @act-crusader said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @gt12 said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @frank said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Havili is a cut above.
    Definite All Black.

    Ive never seen him under huge pressure - he gets a sweet ride in this team, so there are still some question marks.

    Fake news.

    You still have to perform on both sides of the ball. Given he has been critical for us in what has been a mixed bag season.

    He performs in a Saders team. Send him to the Landers and let’s see if he stands out as much.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #191

    @machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @bones and?

    Sigh. How many penalties against the crusaders for doing the exact same?

    Two high tackle penalties against the chiefs that are pretty lame and they get a warning. Crusaders?

    MachpantsM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    wrote on last edited by Anonymous
    #192

    How does this work? A referral for something under penalty advantage. Does it have to be something pretty serious for them to penalise the Chiefs?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #193

    Am I allowed to say fuck these captains referrals?

    MachpantsM M A 3 Replies Last reply
    6
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #194

    @bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @bones and?

    Sigh. How many penalties against the crusaders for doing the exact same?

    Two high tackle penalties against the chiefs that are pretty lame and they get a warning. Crusaders?

    Right, I see. So the main reason it was two in a row, one straight after the other. That matters in rugby

    BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MachpantsM Online
    MachpantsM Online
    Machpants
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #195

    @taniwharugby said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Am I allowed to say fuck these captains referrals?

    Fuck them and the horse they rode in on

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mattasaurus
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #196

    @taniwharugby said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    Am I allowed to say fuck these captains referrals?

    In the loudest possible way mate👍

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #197

    @machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:

    @bones and?

    Sigh. How many penalties against the crusaders for doing the exact same?

    Two high tackle penalties against the chiefs that are pretty lame and they get a warning. Crusaders?

    Right, I see. So the main reason it was two in a row, one straight after the other. That matters in rugby

    Two in a row what?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #198

    Such a great last 4 minutes, makes me a bigger fan...these are gone for the TT right?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.