Crusaders v Brumbies
-
@gt12 said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
Game is close, I would like it if the Saders lost as at least it would give this competition some fire.
By the way I’m supporting(ish) the Saders
Nah you’re a hater 😎
Saders doing their part for TT rugby by keeping it close
-
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
I think the saders are going to lose this, they look clueless and their staples are not enough to over power ponies
this is either goign to be goddamn nostradamus, or age like milk.
I'll back age like milk. In 20 minutes they'll win by 30
-
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
I think the saders are going to lose this, they look clueless and their staples are not enough to over power ponies
this is either goign to be goddamn nostradamus, or age like milk.
I'll back age like milk. In 20 minutes they'll win by 30
There seems no X factor, or penetration. Apart from mo'unga one lovely piece. Not enough to win on
-
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
@nzzp said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
I think the saders are going to lose this, they look clueless and their staples are not enough to over power ponies
this is either goign to be goddamn nostradamus, or age like milk.
I'll back age like milk. In 20 minutes they'll win by 30
There seems no X factor, or penetration. Apart from mo'unga one lovely piece. Not enough to win on
They’ve struggled to get easy possession in the opposition red zone, so struggling to get anywhere - the Brumbies are boring as fuck but they are doing a good job of staying in it
-
Great covering tackle after a great run
-
I can't see a frame which shows he's in touch.
-
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
No video proof to, certainly out, but not clear and obvious. If you know what I mean
It's logically out, but can't prove it
Is that the Faingnuku defense used against the Chiefs?
-
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
No video proof to, certainly out, but not clear and obvious. If you know what I mean
It's logically out, but can't prove it
Nope that last view, almost got away with it