Crusaders v Brumbies
-
Great covering tackle after a great run
-
I can't see a frame which shows he's in touch.
-
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
No video proof to, certainly out, but not clear and obvious. If you know what I mean
It's logically out, but can't prove it
Is that the Faingnuku defense used against the Chiefs?
-
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
No video proof to, certainly out, but not clear and obvious. If you know what I mean
It's logically out, but can't prove it
Nope that last view, almost got away with it
-
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
No video proof to, certainly out, but not clear and obvious. If you know what I mean
It's logically out, but can't prove it
Eh? What's wrong with my TV? That's clear as anything.
-
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
No video proof to, certainly out, but not clear and obvious. If you know what I mean
It's logically out, but can't prove it
Nope that last view, almost got away with it
Last view? That was the bloody first view shown!
-
@yeetyaah said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
@machpants literally a bright orange boot touching the line.
I think he's in touch, but that's a ropy frame to make a judgement. It's certainly over the line and probably the correct decision.
-
@bones said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
@machpants said in Crusaders v Brumbies:
No video proof to, certainly out, but not clear and obvious. If you know what I mean
It's logically out, but can't prove it
Nope that last view, almost got away with it
Last view? That was the bloody first view shown!
-
That was efficient