• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NZ cricket 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
143 Posts 31 Posters 3.8k Views
NZ cricket 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #59

    @donsteppa said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @bayimports said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @canefan said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @shark said in NZ cricket 2021:

    Didn't really rescue us in Australia in 19/20 though did he

    Who did? IIRC Blundell was the only guy who emerged with his reputation enhanced.

    really? ......wags might have something to say about that 🙂

    I thought he meant of the batsman, but the grand total of two impressive players from that series reminds me of why I try to forget that series...!

    What series?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    His average is 39.77 so Watling could very realistically nudge that above 40 over these last three tests. That would be some feat for a Kiwi keeper. Reminds me of the last few tests of Flems' career, also against England I think. Fleming couldn't manage a tenth test century (funny how at the time that seemed like a lot for a NZ batsman, and should have been much more but his conversion rate was abysmal), but he did scrape through with his average back above 40 to finish.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #61

    @shark said in NZ cricket 2021:

    His average is 39.77 so Watling could very realistically nudge that above 40 over these last three tests. That would be some feat for a Kiwi keeper. Reminds me of the last few tests of Flems' career, also against England I think. Fleming couldn't manage a tenth test century (funny how at the time that seemed like a lot for a NZ batsman, and should have been much more but his conversion rate was abysmal), but he did scrape through with his average back above 40 to finish.

    According to who ? Cricinfo has it at 38.11 so he’s unlikely to get above 40.

    Doesn’t matter though, a legend no matter what on account of that plus his keeping.

    canefanC sharkS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #62

    @mn5 said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @shark said in NZ cricket 2021:

    His average is 39.77 so Watling could very realistically nudge that above 40 over these last three tests. That would be some feat for a Kiwi keeper. Reminds me of the last few tests of Flems' career, also against England I think. Fleming couldn't manage a tenth test century (funny how at the time that seemed like a lot for a NZ batsman, and should have been much more but his conversion rate was abysmal), but he did scrape through with his average back above 40 to finish.

    According to who ? Cricinfo has it at 38.11 so he’s unlikely to get above 40.

    Doesn’t matter though, a legend no matter what on account of that plus his keeping.

    Bailed us out more times than I can remember

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #63

    @canefan said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @mn5 said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @shark said in NZ cricket 2021:

    His average is 39.77 so Watling could very realistically nudge that above 40 over these last three tests. That would be some feat for a Kiwi keeper. Reminds me of the last few tests of Flems' career, also against England I think. Fleming couldn't manage a tenth test century (funny how at the time that seemed like a lot for a NZ batsman, and should have been much more but his conversion rate was abysmal), but he did scrape through with his average back above 40 to finish.

    According to who ? Cricinfo has it at 38.11 so he’s unlikely to get above 40.

    Doesn’t matter though, a legend no matter what on account of that plus his keeping.

    Bailed us out more times than I can remember

    Pun intended I hope

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #64

    @shark said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @dogmeat said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @mn5 Smithy had only played 3 tests when Knott retired and two full seasons when Marsh did.

    Yeah I'm pretty sure Smith was regarded as being right up there come the late 80s. Quality glove work, two test centuries in a time when keepers only had to be handy with the bat, and a reputation for being able to hit a long ball after he equalled a world record for runs off a test over.

    As I recall Smith was considered a world-class keeper and an unreliable if under-rated batsman with a beautiful but over-used cut.
    He fixed that though in retirement, in later years he was far more well-rounded.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #65

    @mn5 said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @canefan said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @mn5 said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @shark said in NZ cricket 2021:

    His average is 39.77 so Watling could very realistically nudge that above 40 over these last three tests. That would be some feat for a Kiwi keeper. Reminds me of the last few tests of Flems' career, also against England I think. Fleming couldn't manage a tenth test century (funny how at the time that seemed like a lot for a NZ batsman, and should have been much more but his conversion rate was abysmal), but he did scrape through with his average back above 40 to finish.

    According to who ? Cricinfo has it at 38.11 so he’s unlikely to get above 40.

    Doesn’t matter though, a legend no matter what on account of that plus his keeping.

    Bailed us out more times than I can remember

    Pun intended I hope

    Not at all

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #66

    @mn5 hmm maybe I misread a batting stat somewhere. Could that be his average playing as a 'keeper as opposed to combined with his tests playing as a specialist batsman?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #67

    @shark said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @mn5 hmm maybe I misread a batting stat somewhere. Could that be his average playing as a 'keeper as opposed to combined with his tests playing as a specialist batsman?

    Must be cos it’s definitely 38.11.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #68

    It is. BJ also has a lot more dismissals than Smith in a similar number of tests.

    IMG_2053.JPG

    CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #69

    @bovidae Pretty tough not to go Watling over the others on these stats.

    I've only seen highlights of Smith, but based on his reputation and watching the others, BJs runs will have come in much tougher spots than the others too. Later career McCullum was a better bat, but he'd been freed from having to do several hundred squats a match.

    SynicBastS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #70
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBastS Offline
    SynicBast
    wrote on last edited by
    #71

    For me, watling is the best all around of the 6 I have watched a fair bit of: Wadsworth, Lees, Smith, Parore, BMac and BJ. (Forget germon, Jock Edwards or young, all break glass situation or in Germon's case, regional parochialism run riot - the reuben thorne of NZ cricket

    Of the 6, I actually rate Parore as the most technically proficient and smoothest of them all.

    Wadsworth, Lees and Smith are pretty much all in a group - they had different strengths depending on the attack and conditions.

    But in terms of all around contribution and glue, I'll take Watling everytime.

    Lees, Parore and Smithy to some extent with his decision making while batting were loud personalities and could be a distraction. Wadsworth could be untidy although that may be more a case that he looked like he was perpetually just arisen from a 5 day bender. Bmac, a very good keeper but once he gave up the gloves he became a much much better player.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to SynicBast on last edited by MN5
    #72

    @synicbast said in NZ cricket 2021:

    For me, watling is the best all around of the 6 I have watched a fair bit of: Wadsworth, Lees, Smith, Parore, BMac and BJ. (Forget germon, Jock Edwards or young, all break glass situation or in Germon's case, regional parochialism run riot - the reuben thorne of NZ cricket

    Of the 6, ****I actually rate Parore as the most technically proficient and smoothest of them all.


    Wadsworth, Lees and Smith are pretty much all in a group - they had different strengths depending on the attack and conditions.

    But in terms of all around contribution and glue, I'll take Watling everytime.

    Lees, Parore and Smithy to some extent with his decision making while batting were loud personalities and could be a distraction. Wadsworth could be untidy although that may be more a case that he looked like he was perpetually just arisen from a 5 day bender. Bmac, a very good keeper but once he gave up the gloves he became a much much better player.

    How desperate were we to have to play Parore as a specialist batsman though ? Even bearing in mind some of the donkeys who played for NZ his record in that department is pretty poor especially for someone who I remember being pretty proficient and good to watch at times.

    McCullum could have very possibly had a Ross Taylor like record if he never kept wicket. Getting those huge scores that he did takes real talent.

    nostrildamusN SynicBastS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #73

    is there a related fast bowler element to these figures? I think Ian Smith was a superb keeper, but he wasn't keeping to so many quality fast bowlers...wondering whether statistically that may be a factor..

    MN5M CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #74

    @nostrildamus said in NZ cricket 2021:

    is there a related fast bowler element to these figures? I think Ian Smith was a superb keeper, but he wasn't keeping to so many quality fast bowlers...wondering whether statistically that may be a factor..

    One of them was pretty decent.......but fair to say Cairns, Snedden, Chats, Morrison etc weren’t what you’d call rapid.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #75

    @mn5 said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @nostrildamus said in NZ cricket 2021:

    is there a related fast bowler element to these figures? I think Ian Smith was a superb keeper, but he wasn't keeping to so many quality fast bowlers...wondering whether statistically that may be a factor..

    One of them was pretty decent.......but fair to say Cairns, Snedden, Chats, Morrison etc weren’t what you’d call rapid.

    you must be a young chap, in his day Morrison was considered relatively quick--we were obviously very very desperate..

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #76

    @nostrildamus said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @mn5 said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @nostrildamus said in NZ cricket 2021:

    is there a related fast bowler element to these figures? I think Ian Smith was a superb keeper, but he wasn't keeping to so many quality fast bowlers...wondering whether statistically that may be a factor..

    One of them was pretty decent.......but fair to say Cairns, Snedden, Chats, Morrison etc weren’t what you’d call rapid.

    you must be a young chap, in his day Morrison was considered relatively quick--we were obviously very very desperate..

    Danny was pretty quick for a little guy. Had that high release to make the most of his reach. Had a bit of attitude too, in a Wags sort of way if I recall. Typical fast bowler mentality

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #77

    @canefan said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @nostrildamus said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @mn5 said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @nostrildamus said in NZ cricket 2021:

    is there a related fast bowler element to these figures? I think Ian Smith was a superb keeper, but he wasn't keeping to so many quality fast bowlers...wondering whether statistically that may be a factor..

    One of them was pretty decent.......but fair to say Cairns, Snedden, Chats, Morrison etc weren’t what you’d call rapid.

    you must be a young chap, in his day Morrison was considered relatively quick--we were obviously very very desperate..

    Danny was pretty quick for a little guy. Had that high release to make the most of his reach. Had a bit of attitude too, in a Wags sort of way if I recall. Typical fast bowler short man mentality

    FIFY

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #78

    @crucial said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @canefan said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @nostrildamus said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @mn5 said in NZ cricket 2021:

    @nostrildamus said in NZ cricket 2021:

    is there a related fast bowler element to these figures? I think Ian Smith was a superb keeper, but he wasn't keeping to so many quality fast bowlers...wondering whether statistically that may be a factor..

    One of them was pretty decent.......but fair to say Cairns, Snedden, Chats, Morrison etc weren’t what you’d call rapid.

    you must be a young chap, in his day Morrison was considered relatively quick--we were obviously very very desperate..

    Danny was pretty quick for a little guy. Had that high release to make the most of his reach. Had a bit of attitude too, in a Wags sort of way if I recall. Typical fast bowler short man mentality

    FIFY

    Probably a bit of both!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

NZ cricket 2021
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.