• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Too many events at the Olympics?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
olympics
264 Posts 43 Posters 10.8k Views
Too many events at the Olympics?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #107

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    Actually one sport that shouldn’t be there is men’s soccer. It’s the Olympics not a youth tournament. If the best players can’t be there then don’t have it.

    There's a good argument that professionals shouldn't attend. If your sport has a professional league, bad luck.

    voodooV gt12G Rancid SchnitzelR 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #108

    There's also baseball on in the middle of the MLB season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #109

    @antipodean said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    Actually one sport that shouldn’t be there is men’s soccer. It’s the Olympics not a youth tournament. If the best players can’t be there then don’t have it.

    There's a good argument that professionals shouldn't attend. If your sport has a professional league, bad luck.

    Why is that a good argument? Isn't the Olympics supposed to be the best of the best? Why would forming a professional league to help athletes live, improve, survive, in between Olympics rule those athletes out?

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #110

    If the Olympics isn't the pinnacle fuck it off

    That instantly rules out a lot

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to antipodean on last edited by gt12
    #111

    @antipodean said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    Actually one sport that shouldn’t be there is men’s soccer. It’s the Olympics not a youth tournament. If the best players can’t be there then don’t have it.

    There's a good argument that professionals shouldn't attend. If your sport has a professional league, bad luck.

    I don’t mind professionals attending as long as this award is the premier award.

    No golf, tennis, soccer, baseball, basketball. More too but those are the obvious ones.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by gt12
    #112

    @mariner4life said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    If the Olympics isn't the pinnacle fuck it off

    That instantly rules out a lot

    I think that’s why the Olympics should also reduce relays and other shit. It just helps the Rich (and same) countries.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #113

    @voodoo said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    Why is that a good argument? Isn't the Olympics supposed to be the best of the best?

    Exactly. And for a lot of them it's nothing like. Soccer, golf, basketball, baseball, tennis...

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #114

    @antipodean said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @voodoo said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    Why is that a good argument? Isn't the Olympics supposed to be the best of the best?

    Exactly. And for a lot of them it's nothing like. Soccer, golf, basketball, baseball, tennis...

    Sure. Doesn't mean that ruling professionals out is the answer. Most of these athletes are pros now

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #115

    I don't understand why the 100m running would be an event in this new stripped down Olympics. It is just cycling but slower.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #116

    @rotated said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    I don't understand why the 100m running would be an event in this new stripped down Olympics. It is just cycling but slower.

    I dunno, from a standing start I’d back Usain Bolt

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #117

    @catogrande said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @rotated said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    I don't understand why the 100m running would be an event in this new stripped down Olympics. It is just cycling but slower.

    I dunno, from a standing start I’d back Usain Bolt

    True but it's no obvious that it would be over 100m. The metric system wasn't around in ancient Greece so it would need to be over some other arbitrary distance.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #118

    @rotated said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @catogrande said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @rotated said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    I don't understand why the 100m running would be an event in this new stripped down Olympics. It is just cycling but slower.

    I dunno, from a standing start I’d back Usain Bolt

    True but it's no obvious that it would be over 100m. The metric system wasn't around in ancient Greece so it would need to be over some other arbitrary distance.

    Look feller, you stated 100M. Now that your whole argument has been rubbished you can't go changing things based on obscure history.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus Banned
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #119

    @catogrande said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @rotated said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @catogrande said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @rotated said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    I don't understand why the 100m running would be an event in this new stripped down Olympics. It is just cycling but slower.

    I dunno, from a standing start I’d back Usain Bolt

    True but it's no obvious that it would be over 100m. The metric system wasn't around in ancient Greece so it would need to be over some other arbitrary distance.

    Look feller, you stated 100M. Now that your whole argument has been rubbished you can't go changing things based on obscure history.

    I thought you knew how the Fern 'works'?

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #120

    @nostrildamus said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @catogrande said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @rotated said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @catogrande said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @rotated said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    I don't understand why the 100m running would be an event in this new stripped down Olympics. It is just cycling but slower.

    I dunno, from a standing start I’d back Usain Bolt

    True but it's no obvious that it would be over 100m. The metric system wasn't around in ancient Greece so it would need to be over some other arbitrary distance.

    Look feller, you stated 100M. Now that your whole argument has been rubbished you can't go changing things based on obscure history.

    I thought you knew how the Fern 'works'?

    Point

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #121

    @gt12 said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @mariner4life said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    If the Olympics isn't the pinnacle fuck it off

    That instantly rules out a lot

    I think that’s why the Olympics should also reduce relays and other shit. It just helps the Rich (and same) countries.

    Yeah cos Jamaica is the new Bermuda

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #122

    @canefan said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    This is Olympic level debate fellas. Respect

    Debating should be in the Olympics.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by sparky
    #123

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    Actually one sport that shouldn’t be there is men’s soccer. It’s the Olympics not a youth tournament. If the best players can’t be there then don’t have it.

    I would replace Football in the Olympics with an elite five-aside competition. Baseball and Basketball should be removed.

    Tennis and Golf shouldn't be in the Olympics either. The elite players would rather win a Grand Slam, the Davis Cup or the Ryder Cup than the Olympics.

    An Olympic Gold Medal needs to be the pinnacle of an athlete's career.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #124

    @kirwan said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @antipodean said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    @antipodean said in Olympics Thread:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    @antipodean said in Olympics Thread:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    @antipodean said in Olympics Thread:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    @antipodean said in Olympics Thread:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    @antipodean said in Olympics Thread:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    @antipodean said in Olympics Thread:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    @antipodean said in Olympics Thread:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    @antipodean said in Olympics Thread:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    @antipodean said in Olympics Thread:

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Olympics Thread:

    Yeah you’ve mentioned the Phelps thing before and it doesn’t help your argument. Another ridiculously stupid statement.

    As I said last year: Phelps has won a single Olympic gold medal where he alone was the fastest over a distance: 200m freestyle. Paavo Nurmi and Carl Lewis are better Olympians.

    If I recall correctly you also said that Bradbury’s achievement was greater than anything Phelps ever did. That’s easily the stupidest thing I’ve ever seen on TSF, although the argument that butterfly is equivalent to jogging comes close.

    You didn't lose your lollies as much as I expected to that bait. Which surprised me. Butterfly is slower than freestyle over the same distance. So is jogging, Any other analogies I can assist you with?

    This has to be a windup. You cant be that stupid.

    Great rebuttal. 👏 We're done here.

    Ok I’ll bite. Bear crawls, hopping on one leg and skipping are slower than running. Ergo they must be jogging right? What awesome logic.

    You should probably stop posting if that's your grasp of the topic.

    To make this easier for you: Jogging is slower than sprinting. So too is walking. That doesn't mean walking and jogging are the same thing.

    That’s exactly what I’m saying. Now apply that to swimming. It’s really not so hard. You can do it.

    I’ll make it even easier for you. Butterfly is slower than freestyle. Why? Because it’s a completely different farking stroke. Not because it’s just a slower freestyle. Comparing it to jogging is absolutely absurd.

    You're either deliberately missing the point or really fucking stupid.

    Delightful.

    And accurate.

    See above. Seriously man. How hard is it to understand? Butterfly and freestyle are not the equivalent to running and jogging. If you are still arguing that then you need your head examined.

    Once again rancid demonstrates his complete ignorance of analogy and ignores the point.

    Once again you lead with your face and instead of getting out while you can you double down on the stupid. Again a discussion with Antipodean has taken a turn for the surreal.

    Everyone else has the cognitive ability to understand that the analogy for running events was to demonstrate that there's no abundance of medals for doing the same distance slower.

    And anyone with a brain would realise that it’s a terrible analogy to compare different swimming strokes to jogging and running. That’s my issue. Seriously, how hard is that for you to understand?

    I understand perfectly that you're busy flailing away at your own straw man.

    What straw man? It’s really simple. Jogging is a terrible analogy. Yes butterfly is slower than freestyle but it is not the same as comparing jogging with running.

    It doesn't have to be the fucking same. No one but you is arguing butterfly is a technically difficult stroke and energy sapping. It's uncontested. That's your straw man. The point is same distance slower, hence why it was mentioned jogging the same distance instead of sprinting. Analogies don't have to match in every aspect, just the commonality.

    What are you on about? Give up Black Knight. You’re absolutely beyond ridiculous now. I made myself very clear what I meant from the get go. There’s no strawman ffs. Get help.

    A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, whereas the proper idea of the argument under discussion was not addressed or properly refuted. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

    Since I need to explain this:

    • The proper idea was medals for doing the same distance slower.
    • You didn't adddress this, instead argued that comparing "jogging" with "butterfly" was stupid.

    It’s obvious to everyone but one poster.

    Disagree.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #125

    @nta said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    @voodoo said in Too many events at the Olympics?:

    And equestrian has a rich history, is huge overseas

    It's "higher, faster, stronger"

    No mention of "horser"

    Lots of horseyness at the ancient Olympics.

    Ancient Olympic Games - Wikipedia

    Ancient Olympic Games - Wikipedia
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #126

    Was cycling part of the cull? I’m down with road racing but that velodrome stuff can be ditched. How many people have access to a velodrome and how many engage in that Kieran stuff? If swimming can be said to have silly events then surely cycling is up there to?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Too many events at the Olympics?
Sports Talk
olympics
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.