• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
108 Posts 38 Posters 4.9k Views
Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Online
    A Online
    ARHS
    replied to Yeahtheboys on last edited by
    #30

    @yeahtheboys well said!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to ARHS on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #31

    @arhs said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @kiwi_expat I think you are way off beam in your analysis. Have you ever watched how opposition backlines react to DMacs field coverage? He constantly creates threats, and stretches the opposition to counter, popping up across the width of the park. I would have thought that wore down the opposition to some degree. Not sure how you and others regard him as such a liability in everything he does at high level.

    thats not untrue....but i dont think he converts anywhere near as many as he should, he might stretch the defence and then throw a hospital pass or not see what he's created and take it into contact whilst isolated...maybe he's not tall enough too see everything

    that why what he does, in my mind, works so much better as an impact when the team is tired, doing what he does in the first 20min with fresh jackles is dangerous

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #32

    @arhs said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @kiwi_expat I think you are way off beam in your analysis. Have you ever watched how opposition backlines react to DMacs field coverage? He constantly creates threats, and stretches the opposition to counter, popping up across the width of the park. I would have thought that wore down the opposition to some degree. Not sure how you and others regard him as such a liability in everything he does at high level.

    We're talking about Test rugby here. The one where he constantly goes backwards or runs away from support so our forwards have to go backwards to support him, or he gives hospital passes to avoid getting tackled.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to antipodean on last edited by Machpants
    #33

    @antipodean said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @arhs said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @kiwi_expat I think you are way off beam in your analysis. Have you ever watched how opposition backlines react to DMacs field coverage? He constantly creates threats, and stretches the opposition to counter, popping up across the width of the park. I would have thought that wore down the opposition to some degree. Not sure how you and others regard him as such a liability in everything he does at high level.

    We're talking about Test rugby here. The one where he constantly goes backwards or runs away from support so our forwards have to go backwards to support him, or he gives hospital passes to avoid getting tackled.

    He did that at least three times last test, looked flash but ABs ended up in s much worse position afterwards. It's really ineffective and undesirable at international level. Foster & Aaron specifically pointed out going wide to early, and DMac as one of the decision makers was one of the worst for that

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #34

    @machpants its also hard to anticipate so the other backs seem to struggle to be in the right position IF he does create something

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #35

    @arhs

    I do find it funny that we spend so much time pissing around about 15, when our problems are with our go forward up front, our discipline, and our strategy/tactics which are the primary responsibility of our main playmaker.

    I’m really starting to wonder whether Mo’unga can drive a team around the field - they seem set on having others there to help him do his job.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #36

    @gt12 said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @arhs

    I do find it funny that we spend so much time pissing around about 15, when our problems are with our go forward up front, our discipline, and our strategy/tactics which are the primary responsibility of our main playmaker.

    I’m really starting to wonder whether Mo’unga can drive a team around the field - they seem set on having others there to help him do his job.

    Yeah they took it wide too early, because that what the play makers called. Smith mentioned that specifically, there were so many options, they tried them too early

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #37

    @machpants said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @gt12 said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @arhs

    I do find it funny that we spend so much time pissing around about 15, when our problems are with our go forward up front, our discipline, and our strategy/tactics which are the primary responsibility of our main playmaker.

    I’m really starting to wonder whether Mo’unga can drive a team around the field - they seem set on having others there to help him do his job.

    Yeah they took it wide too early, because that what the play makers called. Smith mentioned that specifically, there were so many options, they tried them too early

    Yeah, I heard him talk about that and liked the fact that he said that he could also improve - they seem to have leadership teams and his appears to be defense, so he wasn't necessarily being as vocal as he could have. I'd like to know who drives the attack, as he didn't mention Dmac by name, but I assume it is Mo'unga, Havili, and Dmac. It may be too many cooks and broth situation, so Dmac probably has some blame.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by rotated
    #38

    Long story short the coaching staff became totally ambivelant about how the game should be played and the positional requirements at All Black level.

    They started to fetishise getting in the squad rather than the 23 or 15.

    There are a lot of issues but I think most start from there. How many players currently own their All Black jersey? Fuck all.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    A big part of rugby is winning the collisions.

    When you've got a lot of little guys in the team, you start to lose too many and too many in a row - and you get hurt.

    You need a few playmakers - the best of whom tend to be a bit smaller and you have to accept they'll get flattened or run over occasionally - but, I like to have plenty of big guys around them so that there's bail out options regularly on hand and guys who can cover defensively. I miss Ma'a Nonu!

    When we start fielding an under-sized 8 in Ardie, Aaron Smith, Mo'unga, Havili (a smallish 12), Sevu Reece and DMac that's starting to get a bit Japan-like to me.

    I'm inclined to throw in a few more bigger bodies.

    1 Reply Last reply
    11
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    Most points ever put on Aussie. Foster 4 lyf.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by
    #41

    @yeetyaah said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    Most points ever put on Aussie. Foster 4 lyf.

    Yeah, nah

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    Rennie found out.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #43

    @bones said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    Rennie found out.

    No Professor on the staff.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    Guess we can lock this thread then?

    The title was too long, and the content of the first post, really. 😉

    rotatedR boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to kiwi_expat on last edited by
    #45

    @kiwi_expat said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    While I'm not sold on DMac starting at 15, I have to disagree on this

    Play him against tier-two opponents and he looks a million dollars, play him against big imposing physical sides and he'll get flattened, time and again.

    He was pretty damn good at 15 against the likes of Wales, Ireland in 2018 - and outstanding against England on that tour and I'd hardly call those teams tier two or lacking physicality.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #46

    @act-crusader said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    When do we stop saying Ardie is “out of position” at no.8 when he has played more there for the Canes and ABs in the last 3 seasons than he has at openside.

    When he starts from the bench?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #47

    @victor-meldrew said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @kiwi_expat said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    While I'm not sold on DMac starting at 15, I have to disagree on this

    Play him against tier-two opponents and he looks a million dollars, play him against big imposing physical sides and he'll get flattened, time and again.

    He was pretty damn good at 15 against the likes of Wales, Ireland in 2018 - and outstanding against England on that tour and I'd hardly call those teams tier two or lacking physicality.

    Then he had his knee injury and it all went to shit.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #48

    @antipodean said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @victor-meldrew said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    @kiwi_expat said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    While I'm not sold on DMac starting at 15, I have to disagree on this

    Play him against tier-two opponents and he looks a million dollars, play him against big imposing physical sides and he'll get flattened, time and again.

    He was pretty damn good at 15 against the likes of Wales, Ireland in 2018 - and outstanding against England on that tour and I'd hardly call those teams tier two or lacking physicality.

    Then he had his knee injury and it all went to shit.

    Yeah, seems to have lost a bit of snap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #49

    @nta said in Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..):

    Guess we can lock this thread then?

    The title was too long, and the content of the first post, really. 😉

    One try that wasn't a break out from their own half wasn't it? Conceded three.

    Problem solved.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Hansen/Foster's recent selection philosophy & the consequences it has on team balance (back-row, back-three, bench etc..)
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.