• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Chiefs vs Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
390 Posts 45 Posters 18.6k Views
Chiefs vs Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Saders by a thousaaaaand due to their AB stacked side.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #26

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    Saders by a thousaaaaand due to their AB stacked side.

    Crusaders have 6 current AB’s in the starting 15
    The Chiefs have 7

    Must be the Chiefs by a thousaaaaad

    CrucialC WingerW 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #27

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    Saders by a thousaaaaand due to their AB stacked side.

    Crusaders have 6 current AB’s in the starting 15
    The Chiefs have 7

    Must be the Chiefs by a thousaaaaad

    There are 23 players per side.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    replied to Crucial on last edited by Chris
    #28

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    Saders by a thousaaaaand due to their AB stacked side.

    Crusaders have 6 current AB’s in the starting 15
    The Chiefs have 7

    Must be the Chiefs by a thousaaaaad

    There are 23 players per side.

    I do know that then Chiefs have 8 Crusaders 9
    But one is Bridge so it’s even.

    CrucialC A 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #29

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    Saders by a thousaaaaand due to their AB stacked side.

    Crusaders have 6 current AB’s in the starting 15
    The Chiefs have 7

    Must be the Chiefs by a thousaaaaad

    There are 23 players per side.

    I do know that then Chiefs have 8 Crusaders 9
    But one is Bridge so it’s even.

    Laden, I tell you.
    Let’s not forget all the others that you say should be in the ABs.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Pretty handy Crusaders team assuming they can all make it to the starting line.

    Chiefs attack might struggle without ALB, PGS and Narawa.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #31

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    Saders by a thousaaaaand due to their AB stacked side.

    Crusaders have 6 current AB’s in the starting 15
    The Chiefs have 7

    Must be the Chiefs by a thousaaaaad

    There are 23 players per side.

    I do know that then Chiefs have 8 Crusaders 9
    But one is Bridge so it’s even.

    Laden, I tell you.
    Let’s not forget all the others that you say should be in

    That’s true we will thrash you then

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #32

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    Saders by a thousaaaaand due to their AB stacked side.

    Crusaders have 6 current AB’s in the starting 15
    The Chiefs have 7

    Must be the Chiefs by a thousaaaaad

    There are 23 players per side.

    I do know that then Chiefs have 8 Crusaders 9
    But one is Bridge so it’s even.

    Laden, I tell you.
    Let’s not forget all the others that you say should be in

    That’s true we will thrash you then

    Glad I convinced you.
    Underdogs even at home. That will give us to some inspiration.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    Wasn't this fixture like a fortnight ago?

    What a shit comp

    BovidaeB gt12G NepiaN ACT CrusaderA 4 Replies Last reply
    3
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #34

    @mariner4life said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    Wasn't this fixture like a fortnight ago?

    What a shit comp

    All this weeks fixtures are a repeat of 2 weeks ago. No one ever accused NZR of having an imagination.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #35

    @chris my count is 14 crusaders from recent all black squads and 10 from chiefs. Looks fairly evenly matched though. Should be a good contest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by ARHS
    #36

    @kiwimurph Saders missing Ennor and Moody though. Could be quite telling.
    Good to see the Chiefs spreading it around with a big opportunity for several fringe players. Hope we can see Wrampling soon and on the wing.

    ChrisC CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #37

    @mariner4life said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    Wasn't this fixture like a fortnight ago?

    What a shit comp

    I love having rugby to watch, don’t get me wrong, but this is shit. We literally just played these guys.

    With nothing but NZ derbies, this competition sucks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #38

    @mariner4life said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    Wasn't this fixture like a fortnight ago?

    What a shit comp

    It's ok, you've got your Aussie sports NRL and AFL to watch. You don't need to pretend to be a rugby fan, we'll get by without you. 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #39

    @arhs said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph Saders missing Ennor and Moody though. Could be quite telling.
    Good to see the Chiefs spreading it around with a big opportunity for several fringe players. Hope we can see Wrampling soon and on the wing.

    And Whitelock

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #40

    @nzzp said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @crucial said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @bovidae said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    An updated list:

    Unavailable for selection:
    Luke Jacobson, Reuben O’Neill, Gideon Wrampling, Simon Parker, Anton Lienert-Brown, Xavier Roe, Emoni Narawa, Solomone Tukuafu, Laghlan McWhannell, Mitch Brown, Bradley Slater, Pita Gus Sowakula, Chase Tiatia.

    Slater has been finally diagnosed with a case of cantthrowforshit.

    Contagious in some hookers

    Deviant

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to ARHS on last edited by
    #41

    @arhs said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @kiwimurph Saders missing Ennor and Moody though. Could be quite telling.

    Less chances for the Chiefs to scrum after knock ons.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    Looking forward to this. Bit miffed that the Cheifs get a home crowd whilst our home dump was almost empty. It's the motivation of revenge vs home advantage for mine.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Chris on last edited by Winger
    #43

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    The Chiefs have 7

    7? I don't follow rugby as close as I use to but isn't it only 6

    WingerW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Winger on last edited by Winger
    #44

    @winger said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    @chris said in Chiefs vs Crusaders:

    The Chiefs have 7

    7? I don't follow rugby as close as I use to but isn't it only 6

    Ok one reserve

    Crusaders 6 + 2

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Chiefs vs Crusaders
Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.