• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Rebels v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadersrebels
145 Posts 27 Posters 4.2k Views
Rebels v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    Gotta say despite all the missed tackles the Rebels have scrambled well tonight to snuff out some good breaks the Crusaders have made

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    Bridge.....

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #97

    @taniwharugby said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    Gotta say despite all the missed tackles the Rebels have scrambled well tonight to snuff out some good breaks the Crusaders have made

    Wilkin has been great value.

    However, any attacking spark they've got is about to get killed by the introduction of Powell

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #98

    @KiwiMurph said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    Bridge.....

    Haha.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #99

    That's twice they've been pinged for that now, simple lack of awareness of what's going on

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    I wish NZ teams would put away the attcking kick. Hold onto the ball for some phases and build pressure rather than trying to score in one play.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #101

    @Damo bloody hate them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #102

    That was amazingly poor ruck defence.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #103

    The skill level gap between these teams is enormous.

    T Williams ABs? Wouldn't mind it.

    YeetyaahY BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #104

    Incredible try

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #105

    Matera has been huge in the 2nd spell.

    Nice finish by Williams

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #106

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    antipodeanA DamoD 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #107

    @KiwiMurph said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    The skill level gap between these teams is enormous.

    T Williams ABs? Wouldn't mind it.

    I'd have him over Bower.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #108

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    Once the ball is thrown you can move.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #109

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    I looked it up and there's no restrictions on moving into that space once ball is thrown. Cf. the 15m line, which is disallowed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #110

    Matera looks hurt

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to antipodean on last edited by NTA
    #111

    @antipodean said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    Once the ball is thrown you can move.

    Right - I knew the 15m rule and that the hooker/opponent could be there. The crucial bit is 29d after "any player in the lineout may...".

    *Leave the lineout so as to be in a position to receive the ball, provided they remain within 10 metres of the mark of touch and they keep moving until the lineout is over. *

    If they move in there and AREN'T in a position to receive (i.e. ahead of the ball), then it's a short arm.

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #112

    Neat to see the return of Todd out there in 20.

    Despite them being mong's fairly often, have enjoyed Merhts and Marshall reunited

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #113

    @KiwiMurph said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    T Williams ABs? Wouldn't mind it.

    Not so keen on his defence there though

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #114

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    @antipodean said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    @NTA said in Rebels v Crusaders:

    61:22 - Crusaders throw the ball in. Two of their players move inside the 5m before Whitelock drops it down to them. Is that illegal? Lineout isn't over, after all. Only the hooker could be there I thought?

    Once the ball is thrown you can move.

    Right - I knew the 15m rule and that the hooker/opponent could be there. The crucial bit is 29d after "any player in the lineout may...".

    *Leave the lineout so as to be in a position to receive the ball, provided they remain within 10 metres of the mark of touch and they keep moving until the lineout is over. *

    If they move in there and AREN'T in a position to receive (i.e. ahead of the ball), then it's a short arm.

    That particular requirement (and to keep moving) is more honoured in the breach...

    There is a specific law about the 15m but nothing about the 5m line. Ergo it is fine.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Rebels v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
crusadersrebels
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.