• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Final: Blues vs Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
1.1k Posts 72 Posters 82.5k Views
Final: Blues vs Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #964

    @Chris Bower put in a big shift tonight. Had a touch of peak Ben Franks about him. Running hard and getting in past the first tackler, hit the tackle hard and really drove over the ruck. Was great to see.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #965

    @Chris said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @TheMojoman said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    May I use this opportunity to say Grace needs to be in the ABs squad. Error free, one of the defensive titans, links well, and as Sam Whitelock said, he is the lineout master/leader. Sotutu and him need to be battling it out for the ABs No.8 position for the future.

    Grace was v.good tonight but what’s always in the back of my mind is he’s playing behind a Crusaders tight-five so he should stand out. Harder for someone like Ardie or Mikaele-Tu’u

    But the blues had 3 AB props.and 3 players in Eklund,Hodgeman and Robinson a lot of people were saying should have been in the ABs,
    After the chief’s SF a lot of people were writing off Whitelock as past it, Bower and Jager as average.

    Robinson had a strong shift as a 6 playing lock. Blues scrum was good with Hodgeman.

    Not sure who was calling for Eklund to be an AB but he shouldn’t be grouped with the other two.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to kev on last edited by Chris
    #966

    @kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Chris said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @TheMojoman said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    May I use this opportunity to say Grace needs to be in the ABs squad. Error free, one of the defensive titans, links well, and as Sam Whitelock said, he is the lineout master/leader. Sotutu and him need to be battling it out for the ABs No.8 position for the future.

    Grace was v.good tonight but what’s always in the back of my mind is he’s playing behind a Crusaders tight-five so he should stand out. Harder for someone like Ardie or Mikaele-Tu’u

    But the blues had 3 AB props.and 3 players in Eklund,Hodgeman and Robinson a lot of people were saying should have been in the ABs,
    After the chief’s SF a lot of people were writing off Whitelock as past it, Bower and Jager as average.

    Robinson had a strong shift as a 6 playing lock. Blues scrum was good with Hodgeman.

    Not sure who was calling for Eklund to be an AB but he shouldn’t be grouped with the other two.

    There was some chat about Eklund being Selected in the ABs,Maybe the Selectors should have waited to after the final as it’s closest to a test match you will get pre test season.
    See who reacts well or folds under pressure.

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StagS Offline
    StagS Offline
    Stag
    wrote on last edited by
    #967

    Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #968

    @Chris said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    There was some chat about Eklund being Selected in the ABs,Maybe the Selectors should have waited to after the final as it’s closest to a test match you will get pre test season.
    See who reacts well or folds under pressure.

    It was Canterbury legend and front row expert Richard Loe who wants Eklund in the team. Said he was the form hooker for the last two years and needs to be in the ABs.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mikey07
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #969

    @Bones said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @mikey07 said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    As a Canes fan just want to say a big thank you for choking harder then us in 2015!

    They were playing the reigning champs, not the reigning chumps...😉

    So your saying the 2015 Highlanders team were chumps? 😉

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Stag on last edited by Machpants
    #970

    @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

    Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
    Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

    K J 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frye
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #971

    @Chris said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @TheMojoman said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    May I use this opportunity to say Grace needs to be in the ABs squad. Error free, one of the defensive titans, links well, and as Sam Whitelock said, he is the lineout master/leader. Sotutu and him need to be battling it out for the ABs No.8 position for the future.

    Grace was v.good tonight but what’s always in the back of my mind is he’s playing behind a Crusaders tight-five so he should stand out. Harder for someone like Ardie or Mikaele-Tu’u

    After the chief’s SF a lot of people were writing off Whitelock as past it

    He was completely anonymous against the Chiefs to be fair. Non existent. Error-free though at least.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    replied to Duluth on last edited by Old Samurai Jack
    #972

    @Duluth Your tackle stat to confirm your opinion.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #973

    @Toddy said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Chris said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    There was some chat about Eklund being Selected in the ABs,Maybe the Selectors should have waited to after the final as it’s closest to a test match you will get pre test season.
    See who reacts well or folds under pressure.

    It was Canterbury legend and front row expert Richard Loe who wants Eklund in the team. Said he was the form hooker for the last two years and needs to be in the ABs.

    Richard was pissed again then.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Frye on last edited by
    #974

    @Frye said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Chris said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @TheMojoman said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    May I use this opportunity to say Grace needs to be in the ABs squad. Error free, one of the defensive titans, links well, and as Sam Whitelock said, he is the lineout master/leader. Sotutu and him need to be battling it out for the ABs No.8 position for the future.

    Grace was v.good tonight but what’s always in the back of my mind is he’s playing behind a Crusaders tight-five so he should stand out. Harder for someone like Ardie or Mikaele-Tu’u

    After the chief’s SF a lot of people were writing off Whitelock as past it

    He was completely anonymous against the Chiefs to be fair. Non existent. Error-free though at least.

    He certainly was anonymous against the Chiefs as he didn’t play that game.
    Showed a bit tonight though

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #975

    @KiwiMurph said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    Not really sure he needs to do the breakdance on Eden Park.

    Settle down Karen

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #976

    @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

    Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
    Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

    Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

    BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

    M broughieB 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #977

    @kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

    Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
    Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

    Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

    BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

    It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree

    number9N KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • number9N Offline
    number9N Offline
    number9
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #978

    @Machpants Richie's grneral kicking game was fantastic. Blues were strategically inept.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to number9 on last edited by
    #979

    @number9 said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Machpants Richie's grneral kicking game was fantastic. Blues were strategically inept.

    Totally. Swap the tens, I don't think there would be much difference. Rolls Royce pack etc

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by No Quarter
    #980

    I don't think Mo'unga really took control of that game, despite the front foot ball and wealth of possession handed to him. What I do remember is all of the Saders backs kicking for the corner and playing the territory game - Jordan, Havili, even Reece put one over the touchline in the Blues 22. The best part of that performance from the Saders was that the whole team was on the same page and trying to execute the same gameplan, rather than Mo'unga taking control of the game himself - he's just not that kind of 10. Neither is Beauden. I don't think that game would have changed much in the selectors eyes, particularly for the first test where I'd say there would be concerns about Mo'unga's defense being exposed by the big Irish loosies running through his channel.

    I'd be extremely surpsied if it wasn't Beauden 10 with Mo'unga on the bench to start with, that is what they favoured last season as well.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #981

    @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

    Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
    Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

    Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

    BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

    It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree

    Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Old Samurai Jack on last edited by
    #982

    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    May I use this opportunity to say Grace needs to be in the ABs squad. Error free, one of the defensive titans, links well, and as Sam Whitelock said, he is the lineout master/leader. Sotutu and him need to be battling it out for the ABs No.8 position for the future.

    After tonight's performance, Grace may be the answer at 6 rather than at 8

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #983

    @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @number9 said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Machpants Richie's grneral kicking game was fantastic. Blues were strategically inept.

    Totally. Swap the tens, I don't think there would be much difference. Rolls Royce pack etc

    BB kicking was poor against Brumbies as well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Final: Blues vs Crusaders
Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.