NBA 2015/16 thread
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="ACT Crusader" data-cid="594050" data-time="1467675699"><p>
Magic didn't need to he had rings. Neither did Larry. <br><br>
But Barkley left Philly for a Suns team that had 2 all stars and then to a Rockets team that had two superstars in Dream and Drexler. He was chasing a ring.</p></blockquote>True dat. Magic's and bird's teams were stacked back then too -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="ACT Crusader" data-cid="594053" data-time="1467675987"><p>
On the KD acquisition I don't really care. It's no different to many other acquisitions over the history of the NBA. <br><br>
What is an outrage is Barnes getting $90+ million.... :)</p></blockquote>Not just Barnes, all these mid or lower level guys are getting paid. Didn't Dellevadova sign an 18M USD per year deal? Crazy -
<p>Mills @ the Spurs. you know it makes sense. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ultimately, the NBA players association has to get a lot of credit for the deal they hammered out. There is massive increases in TV money coming in each year (apparently expect another big cap jump next season) and the players are guaranteed 50% of the TV money. Split between a small basketball roster, where really there are maybe 4 main guys you need, and these contracts are not surprising. Essentially the average salary is now $9M per season, so you look at the middle guy of your entire roster, and he is making that. Huge. </p> -
Obvious but strange reaction. If he had have gone to the Spurs there would have been none of these bandwagon allegations - yet they are only 365 days more removed from a title than the Warriors (and have added Aldridge in the interim).<br><br>
He left the Thunder because they are a poor franchise who never spent above the luxury tax when they had a championship team and stuck with a poor coach even two seasons too long. Oh yeah and check out the character part owner/chairman, well former, who had a nasty car accident as the Feds were closing in.<br><br>
I can only hope Adams leaves in free agency too.<br><br>
And I'm not a Warriors fan in the slightest.<br><br>
Guy wants to win a title, he thinks that is his best chance - good on him. I wouldn't want to play with Westbrook either. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="barbarian" data-cid="594055" data-time="1467676129"><p>BTW these changes (inc. Bogut to the Mavs) have left my NBA fandom in a weird spot.<br><br>
Do I stick with the Warriors and be accused of being a bandwagon jumper, someone who just cheers for the winning side?<br><br>
Do I continue to follow Bogut, who is well past his prime and now with a team that will at best finish 7th in the West?<br><br>
Do I hitch my wagon to another Aussie - Delly in Milwaulkee or Simmons in Philly?<br><br>
Or do I pick another team completely and go for a plucky, skillful underdog, like Portland or Minnesota or Boston?<br><br>
All advice welcome here.</p></blockquote>
<br>
Get on the Bucks. A good young team that are well coached. Just missing a piece or two. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="ACT Crusader" data-cid="594064" data-time="1467677225">
<div>
<p>Get on the Bucks. A good young team that are well coached. Just missing a piece or two.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Yeah thinking them or Minnesota to be honest. Both good teams with a lot of upside, who will challenge for titles in 2-3 years time. Love Giannis and Towns, especially.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="canefan" data-cid="594068" data-time="1467677386">
<div>
<p>Funny that OKC and the Cavs worked GSW out in the playoffs, exposing a soft underbelly inside. They have KD now but they weakened around the rim by giving up Bogut, whose absence was felt significantly in the finals</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>They have given up most of their side really. Let go of Rush, McAdoo, Bogut, Ezeli, Barnes. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>That said, they would win the title with a starting five of: Curry, Thompson, Durant, Green and a bloke they pulled out of the crowd before the game. I would like to see them do this actually. </p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="canefan" data-cid="594068" data-time="1467677386"><p>Funny that OKC and the Cavs worked GSW out in the playoffs, exposing a soft underbelly inside. They have KD now but they weakened around the rim by giving up Bogut, whose absence was felt significantly in the finals</p></blockquote>
<br>
I wouldn't characterise it like that canefan. They were still in it in a game 7 of the NBA finals. A performance by LBJ that has "immortalised" him. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="rotated" data-cid="594062" data-time="1467677056">
<div>
<p>Obvious but strange reaction. If he had have gone to the Spurs there would have been none of these bandwagon allegations - yet they are only 365 days more removed from a title than the Warriors (and have added Aldridge in the interim).<br><br>
He left the Thunder because they are a poor franchise who never spent above the luxury tax when they had a championship team and stuck with a poor coach even two seasons too long. Oh yeah and check out the character part owner/chairman, well former, who had a nasty car accident as the Feds were closing in.<br><br>
I can only hope Adams leaves in free agency too.<br><br>
And I'm not a Warriors fan in the slightest.<br><br>
Guy wants to win a title, he thinks that is his best chance - good on him. I wouldn't want to play with Westbrook either.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>They spent above the luxury tax last year.... and got a new very good coach. The old coach wasn't that bad, just got stale. he is now with the Wizards on a big deal.. and him and Durant were close.</p>
<p>And what is wrong with Westbrook exactly? </p>
<p> </p>
<p>OKC beat the Spurs so no, there would not have been this reaction. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>OKC had a bloody great record over the last few years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And btw Adams cannot leave any time soon.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="barbarian" data-cid="594070" data-time="1467677505">
<div>
<p>They have given up most of their side really. Let go of Rush, McAdoo, Bogut, Ezeli, Barnes. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>That said, they would win the title with a starting five of: Curry, Thompson, Durant, Green and a bloke they pulled out of the crowd before the game. I would like to see them do this actually. </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Apparently they have signed Zaza Pachulia for a bargain.... figures really.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="barbarian" data-cid="594069" data-time="1467677410">
<div>
<p>Yeah thinking them or Minnesota to be honest. Both good teams with a lot of upside, who will challenge for titles in 2-3 years time. Love Giannis and Towns, especially.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Wolves more upside than Bucks for me. They will be fun.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="ACT Crusader" data-cid="594072" data-time="1467677894"><p>I wouldn't characterise it like that canefan. They were still in it in a game 7 of the NBA finals. A performance by LBJ that has "immortalised" him.</p></blockquote>Probably sounded harsh. But they wore the Warriors down, and in the last few games Thompson was unstoppable
-
<p>
</p> -
So disappointed man. Things have changed forever. Its not about building a team and a legacy anymore. Its about buying your way to a title. You could argue that GSW built a team and are just adding the final piece but Durant his trading his legacy for a ring the easiest way possible.<br><br>
Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Razbra" data-cid="594152" data-time="1467693279">
<div>
<p>So disappointed man. Things have changed forever. Its not about building a team and a legacy anymore. Its about buying your way to a title. You could argue that GSW built a team and are just adding the final piece but Durant his trading his legacy for a ring the easiest way possible.<br><br>
Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have zero issue with what GSW did. They are supposed to do that. KD on the other hand... he has tarnished his reputation as a competitor beyond repair. He is no competitor. Hell of a good player, very nice guy (apparently).. but he is weak.</p> -
<a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://espn.go.com/nba/story//id/16764416/kevin-durant-taking-easy-road-not-fast'>http://espn.go.com/nba/story//id/16764416/kevin-durant-taking-easy-road-not-fast</a>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Razbra" data-cid="594152" data-time="1467693279"><p>
So disappointed man. Things have changed forever. Its not about building a team and a legacy anymore. Its about buying your way to a title. You could argue that GSW built a team and are just adding the final piece but Durant his trading his legacy for a ring the easiest way possible.<br>
Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk</p></blockquote>I hoped he would stay but at the end of the day this is not new. Dwayne Wade was already a winner before Bosh and LBJ arrived and in victory they emerged with reputations enhanced not forever tarnished. They are all richer than they could have ever imagined, they have fulfilled boyhood dreams and Nike and the other companies sell more shoes than ever before
