• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.1k Posts 79 Posters 62.8k Views
Super Rugby 2025
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #28

    @Canes4life It's whoever is the highest seed, so if 1 loses, they get another crack in the SF guarenteed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    It's impressive how super rugby can come up with new ways of making the competition worse.

    YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    That is a crazy play off system just adds to more confusion.
    It could work out the 3 v 4 play of game could mean nothing.
    They have over thought this format.

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #31

    @Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:

    How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.

    The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance

    Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity

    YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by Machpants
    #32

    I don't mind it as a week off can be detrimental. So this means if you grind you way to the top of the ladder and have a bad day on quarters you still get rewarded with a semi
    EDIT: as long as, as pointed out, the 3/4 play off is first

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #33

    @gt12 said in Super Rugby 2025:

    It's impressive how super rugby can come up with new ways of making the competition worse.

    Exactly, they can blar on about the comp not getting bums on seats all they want, but when they make dumb decisions like this you have to wonder if they're guiding it to its own death. How fucking dumb are these fluffybunnies that run this show.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #34

    @Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:

    @Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:

    How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.

    The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance

    Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity

    When was the last time 1st lost to the bottom seed? Or even 2nd losing to the second from bottom seed? The stupidity here comes from the 3v4 potentially being a dead rubber.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Yeetyaah on last edited by Duluth
    #35

    @Yeetyaah

    Your complaint only makes sense if that game is scheduled last

    Is it?

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #36

    @Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:

    @Yeetyaah

    Your complaint only makes sense if that game is scheduled last

    Is it?

    We won't know this until the schedule is released in a couple weeks. If it's scheduled first then I get their decision making but if it's scheduled last then they are morons.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #37

    @Canes4life

    Second is ok too

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    I like that system. The key is for it to be retained as they grow the teams back out.

    It's not that complex, rewards teams for finishing higher on the table, only a top 6. I like.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    The last time a top qualifier lost to the bottom qualifier was Super 12 in 1999 when the Crusaders beat the Reds.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    If the number 1 seed loses in the first week, do they also lose their home field advantage? They should do - whoever loses should automatically be the 4th seed.

    Daffy JaffyD Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Teams will play 14 regular season matches, consisting of seven home games and seven away games, and be allocated two byes.

    I am happy that there will be an equal number of home and away games, assuming that there is no Super Round to fuck things up again.

    Teams will play four teams twice, with a focus on rivalry match-ups, and the six remaining teams once

    Let's wait to see the details.

    Also, there will be three family-friendly Sunday afternoon games. I wonder who will get those games?

    And, SR starts a week earlier (Friday 14 February).

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #42

    @Bovidae

    Don't get too excited, they say they'll bring it ack the following year.

    I'm sure all of Perth will turn out to see every team there over three days.

    What a fucking stupid idea.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    I don't like it

    Just have a top 6 where the top 2 get a first round playoff bye

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    is it better than top 8?....yes....could it have been better...also yes

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    replied to gt12 on last edited by Daffy Jaffy
    #45

    @gt12 "The three winners of the Qualifying Finals will progress to the Semi-Finals.

    They will be joined by the highest-seeded losing team (the ‘lucky loser’), who will drop one seeding for the Semi-Final draw."
    The way this reads if the top seed loses they only drop to 2nd so still get a home semi ! .

    gt12G KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Daffy Jaffy on last edited by
    #46

    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Super Rugby 2025:

    @gt12 "The three winners of the Qualifying Finals will progress to the Semi-Finals.

    They will be joined by the highest-seeded losing team (the ‘lucky loser’), who will drop one seeding for the Semi-Final draw."
    The way this reads if the top seed loses they only drop to 2nd so still getting a home semi ! .

    Firstly, points off for reading the article 🙂

    Secondly, WTAF?

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    This is the result of setting up a dedicated, independent commission?

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Super Rugby 2025
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.