• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Do we need a World cup?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
rwc
76 Posts 25 Posters 2.7k Views
Do we need a World cup?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    i like the world cup , take it away , what do we have to look forward to ?

    The rest of what we play can get a bit repetitive IMO

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #45

    WC is fine and is a showpiece event. The issue is the intervening years are now pretty much pointless bar the BIL.

    Currently none of the non Rugby Championship games mean anything, the NH sides usually send their shit sides and I never feel they really want to be here. When we head north the players have travelled a million miles and played so many minutes it can be hard for them to get up for it.

    I really thought the League system was a great idea that should have been fleshed out. Perhaps they should have had it in between WC much like the Euro in soccer.

    I don't have the answers but the current system is not working in between WCs.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    If they can’t get the League up and running should we have a WC every two years?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by chimoaus
    #47

    Just had a thought.
    What if you had the Rugby Championship have 6 sides (Add Japan and Fiji)
    Six Nations is left as is.
    You have a global season where the RC and Six Nations are played at the same time. 5 games for all teams. This keeps the NH sides happy.

    For the second half of the year you had say 3 Tiers of 6 based off current World Rankings.
    Gold Tier (1-6)
    Silver Tier (7-12)
    Bronze Tier (13-18)

    Those 6 teams from each tier go to a nominated host country and play each other once over 5 weeks. The top team wins the Gold Tier, Silver or Bronze tier.

    This would leave perhaps 2 or 3 tests each country can organise themselves maybe vs t2 or other countries, not sure.

    Biggest possible issue with this system is getting a fair and accurate ranking system, because that would ultimately dictate the 3 tiers. Other issue is if one hemisphere is dominant in rankings it could be a bit shit if the Gold Tier had 4 or 5 sides from that hemisphere.

    Bonus would be the games in theory be pretty competitive, the Silver and Bronze teams would all get good games against equal opposition.

    Thoughts?

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #48

    Yes, it is a fantastic showcase for the sport and winning the RWC is a pinnicle of a player's career.

    A RWC every two years would mean no more British and Irish Lions tours.

    Two problems that need fixing in international Rugby IMHO.

    1. Inconsistent and poor refereeing. A short law book would help here.

    2. Teams deliberately sending under-strength teams.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #49

    @sparky said in Do we need a World cup?:

    Yes, it is a fantastic showcase for the sport and winning the RWC is a pinnicle of a player's career.

    A RWC every two years would mean no more British and Irish Lions tours.

    Two problems that need fixing in international Rugby IMHO.

    1. Inconsistent and poor refereeing. A short law book would help here.

    2. Teams deliberately sending under-strength teams.

    A bit like the new UEFA Nations League, actually having points on games might reduce the amount of tanking that goes on.

    UEFA Nations League - Wikipedia

    UEFA Nations League - Wikipedia

    Just have to convince the NH nations that balked at the idea that this is the way forward

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    Other thing I would fix in payments between sides playing in the same international.

    If England play Samoa at Twickenham why should the England players get £10,000 each and the Samoa £150 each. Gate receipts need to be shared more equally with touring teams given a minimum 30% share.

    chimoausC canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #51

    @sparky said in Do we need a World cup?:

    Other thing I would fix in payments between sides playing in the same international.

    If England play Samoa at Twickenham why should the England players get £10,000 each and the Samoa £150 each. Gate receipts need to be shared more equally with touring teams given a minimum 30% share

    Yeah this system needs fixing but is so bloody complicated, you may get touring teams demanding a certain sized stadium as it isn't worth their while going to Nelson Vs Eden Park. It is actually interesting that NZRU actually does forgo the profits of Eden Park to share the All Blacks around the country.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #52

    @sparky said in Do we need a World cup?:

    Other thing I would fix in payments between sides playing in the same international.

    If England play Samoa at Twickenham why should the England players get £10,000 each and the Samoa £150 each. Gate receipts need to be shared more equally with touring teams given a minimum 30% share.

    I don't mind them having some sort of ranking system or formula, so that a bit like boxing the higher ranked opponent gets more money. But at least it will be a little more equitable and there will be some transparency

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Do not disturb
    boobooB Do not disturb
    booboo
    replied to geebee on last edited by
    #53

    @geebee said in Do we need a World cup?:

    @booboo said in Do we need a World cup?:

    NZ in 2019: played 11 won 8 lost 2 drew 1 (82%)
    SA in 2019: played 12 won 10 l lost 1 drew 1 (88%)

    Arselicking the boks. Add the results of 2016 17 and 18 as well. You know full well you cant get a comprehensive statistical analysis of home and away results in 1 year,its not physically possible to play everyone.

    No need to be crass.

    Just pointing out that if you try hard enough you can find a metric that has the ABs as the best.

    But in terms of this World Cup we're not. We lost the semi final.

    We lost.

    Suck.

    It.

    Up.

    It took me the the 95 RWC to accept the 91 RWC.

    I'm kind of guessing you don't extend back that far?

    If you do I'm surprised you've learned nothing in 28 years.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    This is the kind of topic that SA fans in 2019 and NZ fans in 2015 and 2011 etc wouldn't debate...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #55

    No, we don't need a world cup, but it adds a lot to the game, especially for the teams outside the Rugby Championship and 6 Nations, so there's no real reason to get rid of it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    Possibly the stupidest thread ever - and there's plenty of competition.

    Having said that I have handed out likes in a personally unparalleled manner. I must need a lie down

    G 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #57

    @chimoaus said in Do we need a World cup?:

    Just had a thought.
    What if you had the Rugby Championship have 6 sides (Add Japan and Fiji)
    Six Nations is left as is.
    You have a global season where the RC and Six Nations are played at the same time. 5 games for all teams. This keeps the NH sides happy.

    For the second half of the year you had say 3 Tiers of 6 based off current World Rankings.
    Gold Tier (1-6)
    Silver Tier (7-12)
    Bronze Tier (13-18)

    I suggested ages ago that SANZAR would have been better off adopting something like this for Super rugby, rather than unbalanced regional conferences. Play initially in your regional conference to qualify for a Tier.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    geebee
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #58

    @booboo said in Do we need a World cup?:

    @geebee said in Do we need a World cup?:

    @booboo said in Do we need a World cup?:

    NZ in 2019: played 11 won 8 lost 2 drew 1 (82%)
    SA in 2019: played 12 won 10 l lost 1 drew 1 (88%)

    Arselicking the boks. Add the results of 2016 17 and 18 as well. You know full well you cant get a comprehensive statistical analysis of home and away results in 1 year,its not physically possible to play everyone.

    No need to be crass.

    Just pointing out that if you try hard enough you can find a metric that has the ABs as the best.

    But in terms of this World Cup we're not. We lost the semi final.

    We lost.

    Suck.

    It.

    Up.

    It took me the the 95 RWC to accept the 91 RWC.

    I'm kind of guessing you don't extend back that far?

    If you do I'm surprised you've learned nothing in 28 years.

    I remember the Maori tour of the UK in 82. I played rugby but not for that long,i was finished by the time i was 23 mostly cos its boring to play when you dont get the ball and work reasons. Its not even my first love,powerlifting is. But ive been watching the ABs since the days of Allan Hewson Stu Wilson and Bernie Fraser. Got you trumped. Move along.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    geebee
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #59
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    geebee
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #60
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    geebee
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #61

    @chimoaus said in Do we need a World cup?:

    WC is fine and is a showpiece event. The issue is the intervening years are now pretty much pointless bar the BIL.

    Currently none of the non Rugby Championship games mean anything, the NH sides usually send their shit sides and I never feel they really want to be here. When we head north the players have travelled a million miles and played so many minutes it can be hard for them to get up for it.

    I really thought the League system was a great idea that should have been fleshed out. Perhaps they should have had it in between WC much like the Euro in soccer.

    I don't have the answers but the current system is not working in between WCs.

    Its not working because of the WC. We need a global season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to geebee on last edited by
    #62

    @geebee said in Do we need a World cup?:

    But ive been watching the ABs since the days of Allan Hewson Stu Wilson and Bernie Fraser. Got you trumped. Move along.

    Im knowledgeable. Ive watched every World Cup since 87. This a clever thread that flies above your senile head grandad.

    🤔

    This is the content I'm here for.

    G ? 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    geebee
    replied to NTA on last edited by geebee
    #63
    This post is deleted!
    jeggaJ KruseK 2 Replies Last reply
    0

Do we need a World cup?
Sports Talk
rwc
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.