• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

The thread of learning something new every day

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
811 Posts 60 Posters 56.9k Views
The thread of learning something new every day
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #664
    Will Sloan  /  Sep 6, 2022  /  tags

    The Cartoon Mystery That Stumped the Internet

    The Cartoon Mystery That Stumped the Internet

    Do you recognize this elf-like man? No, he’s not from “The Littles.”

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #665

    FB_IMG_1663109641752.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #666

    Geek out nerds

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Bones on last edited by Kruse
    #667

    @Bones said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    Geek out nerds

    I only discovered about 4 months ago - that "Spendthrift" meant the opposite of what I thought it did. What I'd thought it meant for decades.
    Still fucking furious.

    BonesB voodooV 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #668

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Bones said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    Geek out nerds

    I only discovered about 4 months ago - that "Spendthrift" meant the opposite of what I thought it did. What I'd thought it meant for decades.
    Still fucking furious.

    Fuck. That's today for me

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    wrote on last edited by Victor Meldrew
    #669

    Jimmy Webb's Wichita Lineman is actually an unfinished song.

    Webb, while proud of the song, has always insisted it was unfinished, and says he initially considered that famous couplet "the biggest, awfulest, dumbest, most obvious false rhyme in history".
    
    He wrote the song to order in 1968, after Campbell had found success with another of his songs, By the Time I Get to Phoenix.
    
    "They called me and said, 'Can you write us a song about a town?'" he recalled in a Radio 2 documentary about Campbell's career.
    
    "And I said, 'I'm not sure I want to write a song about a town right now. I think I've overdone that'.
    
    "He said, 'well, can you do something geographical?' and I spent the rest of the afternoon sweating over Wichita Lineman."
    
    But while Webb worked on the lyrics, Campbell and his producer Al DeLory were getting impatient. They were in the recording studio, with a tight deadline, and no song to record.
    
    "They said, 'We're really in a hurry, send it over'. And I said, 'OK, but the third verse I don't have'."
    
    DeLory wrote an evocative orchestral arrangement in which the strings mimicked the sighing of the telephone wires. To get around the problem of the unfinished third verse, Campbell picked up fellow Wrecking Crew member Carol Kaye's DanElectro six-string bass guitar and improvised the song's famous solo.
    
    Webb, however, thought they'd rejected the song.
    
    "A couple of weeks later I ran into him [Glen Campbell] somewhere, and I said, 'I guess you guys didn't like the song.'" he recalled.
    
    "He said, 'Oh, we cut that'. I said, 'It wasn't done! I was just humming the last bit!'"
    
    "He said, 'Well it's done now!'"
    

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40861326

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #670

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Bones said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    Geek out nerds

    I only discovered about 4 months ago - that "Spendthrift" meant the opposite of what I thought it did. What I'd thought it meant for decades.
    Still fucking furious.

    @Kruse @Bones

    Hi 🙋‍♂️

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #671

    @Tim said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    Will Sloan  /  Sep 6, 2022  /  tags

    The Cartoon Mystery That Stumped the Internet

    The Cartoon Mystery That Stumped the Internet

    Do you recognize this elf-like man? No, he’s not from “The Littles.”

    i love that kind of stuff because thats exactly the kind of thing i would do...remember something from the a show i watched as a kid...and then spend far too long trying to work out the name etc

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #672

    @voodoo I had to check to see if I had the correct understanding.

    I did 😇

    You kids' obviously didn't get a proper education.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #673

    @dogmeat said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @voodoo I had to check to see if I had the correct understanding.

    I did 😇

    You kids' obviously didn't get a proper education.

    I asked my wife and the 4 people in my team - we all had it the wrong way!

    I feel like I might be the butt of some elaborate prank here...

    KruseK KirwanK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to voodoo on last edited by Kruse
    #674

    @voodoo said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @dogmeat said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @voodoo I had to check to see if I had the correct understanding.

    I did 😇

    You kids' obviously didn't get a proper education.

    I asked my wife and the 4 people in my team - we all had it the wrong way!

    I feel like I might be the butt of some elaborate prank here...

    Yeah - I was thinking about this, the fact that so many of us seemed to have it wrong.

    Was there some common author that we all read, that also had it wrong? Most of my vocabulary comes from reading... if W.E. Johns, or Alastair MacLean, or Jack Higgins, or Clive Cussler - had it wrong... I could easily have been vocab-infected as a child.

    eg: I think there's an example of Mark Twain using "literally" incorrectly, which might have been a factor in today's sad state of understanding/use of that word.

    And don't get me started on "acronym"... although I hate to admit defeat, I 'm starting to think the dictionaries should just fucking surrender and update the definition of that word to mean what every fluffybunny thinks it means.

    I'm still fucking angry about this.
    I'm even willing for the dictionaries to change/update the definition of "acronym", in trade for reversing the definition of "spendthrift".

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #675

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    And don't get me started on "acronym"... although I hate to admit defeat, I 'm starting to think the dictionaries should just fucking surrender and update the definition of that word to mean what every fluffybunny thinks it means.

    So, again, I had to look up the definition of the word to see if I had it wrong. I don't - so how is it being misused?

    The one that got me was ironical. I would hear people using it and think 'how ironic'. Then I discovered. Ironical is an actual word. That means ironic. Go figure....

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by Kruse
    #676

    @dogmeat said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    And don't get me started on "acronym"... although I hate to admit defeat, I 'm starting to think the dictionaries should just fucking surrender and update the definition of that word to mean what every fluffybunny thinks it means.

    So, again, I had to look up the definition of the word to see if I had it wrong. I don't - so how is it being misused?

    The one that got me was ironical. I would hear people using it and think 'how ironic'. Then I discovered. Ironical is an actual word. That means ironic. Go figure....

    Acronym - most people use it in place of the correct word - "initialism".
    eg: FBI - is NOT an acronym. Because it's pronounced "Eff-Bee-Aye"... spelling out the letters. It's an initialism.
    But POTUS - IS an acronym (AND an initiatlism) - because it's pronounced as a "word" - this being the key bit that people ignore.
    NZRU - initialism, not acronym.
    Laser - acronym, and initialism.
    Oh - and I think the definitions are subtly different in various dictionaries, but to my understanding - an acronym is not ALWAYS an initialism.
    eg: Benelux - IS an acronym, but NOT an initialism.

    dogmeatD NepiaN KiwiwombleK 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #677

    @Kruse ah Thanks. NASA vs NSA

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #678

    @dogmeat said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse ah Thanks. NASA vs NSA

    Yep - exactly.
    But - 99% of the english-speaking world uses "acronym" to mean "initialism"... so... it's probably just a matter of time before the definition is simply changed.
    I still like to grumpily mutter "initialism" whenever anybody uses "acronym" incorrectly in work meetings though... there's always a confused pause, the start of "what was that?", and the obvious decision to ignore me and just move on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #679

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @dogmeat said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    And don't get me started on "acronym"... although I hate to admit defeat, I 'm starting to think the dictionaries should just fucking surrender and update the definition of that word to mean what every fluffybunny thinks it means.

    So, again, I had to look up the definition of the word to see if I had it wrong. I don't - so how is it being misused?

    The one that got me was ironical. I would hear people using it and think 'how ironic'. Then I discovered. Ironical is an actual word. That means ironic. Go figure....

    Acronym - most people use it in place of the correct word - "initialism".
    eg: FBI - is NOT an acronym. Because it's pronounced "Eff-Bee-Aye"... spelling out the letters. It's an initialism.
    But POTUS - IS an acronym (AND an initiatlism) - because it's pronounced as a "word" - this being the key bit that people ignore.
    NZRU - initialism, not acronym.
    Laser - acronym, and initialism.
    Oh - and I think the definitions are subtly different in various dictionaries, but to my understanding - an acronym is not ALWAYS an initialism.
    eg: Benelux - IS an acronym, but NOT an initialism.

    Do we have a pedant award in the Fernies, if so you're a lock this year against the your/you're crowd.

    I do believe that when words meanings change that dictionaries are slow to change them, despite the fact they're less than 200 years old and had constant shitfights over meanings when they were being developed. I think it's somewhat silly to hold on to a historical definition if the meaning has clearly changed. No doubt I will be a hypocrite and will argue the opposite for a word I like in the future.

    KruseK boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Nepia on last edited by Kruse
    #680

    @Nepia said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @dogmeat said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    And don't get me started on "acronym"... although I hate to admit defeat, I 'm starting to think the dictionaries should just fucking surrender and update the definition of that word to mean what every fluffybunny thinks it means.

    So, again, I had to look up the definition of the word to see if I had it wrong. I don't - so how is it being misused?

    The one that got me was ironical. I would hear people using it and think 'how ironic'. Then I discovered. Ironical is an actual word. That means ironic. Go figure....

    Acronym - most people use it in place of the correct word - "initialism".
    eg: FBI - is NOT an acronym. Because it's pronounced "Eff-Bee-Aye"... spelling out the letters. It's an initialism.
    But POTUS - IS an acronym (AND an initiatlism) - because it's pronounced as a "word" - this being the key bit that people ignore.
    NZRU - initialism, not acronym.
    Laser - acronym, and initialism.
    Oh - and I think the definitions are subtly different in various dictionaries, but to my understanding - an acronym is not ALWAYS an initialism.
    eg: Benelux - IS an acronym, but NOT an initialism.

    Do we have a pedant award in the Fernies, if so you're a lock this year against the your/you're crowd.

    I do believe that when words meanings change that dictionaries are slow to change them, despite the fact they're less than 200 years old and had constant shitfights over meanings when they were being developed. I think it's somewhat silly to hold on to a historical definition if the meaning has clearly changed. No doubt I will be a hypocrite and will argue the opposite for a word I like in the future.

    Yeah - like I say - I fully expect the definition to be changed, considering the widespread misuse ('evolution') of it.
    BUT - probably the thing stopping it - is that there already IS a perfectly good word for what people think it means.
    And by changing the definition of this word - you're actually REMOVING a word from circulation, as there's no longer a word to mean what the current definition.
    If that makes sense? If they change the word "acronym" to mean "initialism" - then we no longer have a word which means "abbreviation which is pronounced as a word".

    Also - I would wear a pedantry award with pride. Words have meanings. For a fucking reason. There's a REASON that "you're" and "your" are two different spellings... they fucking MEAN two different things. The whole goddamn point of language.

    "spendthrift".... fuck. What a fluffybunny.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #681

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Nepia said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @dogmeat said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    And don't get me started on "acronym"... although I hate to admit defeat, I 'm starting to think the dictionaries should just fucking surrender and update the definition of that word to mean what every fluffybunny thinks it means.

    So, again, I had to look up the definition of the word to see if I had it wrong. I don't - so how is it being misused?

    The one that got me was ironical. I would hear people using it and think 'how ironic'. Then I discovered. Ironical is an actual word. That means ironic. Go figure....

    Acronym - most people use it in place of the correct word - "initialism".
    eg: FBI - is NOT an acronym. Because it's pronounced "Eff-Bee-Aye"... spelling out the letters. It's an initialism.
    But POTUS - IS an acronym (AND an initiatlism) - because it's pronounced as a "word" - this being the key bit that people ignore.
    NZRU - initialism, not acronym.
    Laser - acronym, and initialism.
    Oh - and I think the definitions are subtly different in various dictionaries, but to my understanding - an acronym is not ALWAYS an initialism.
    eg: Benelux - IS an acronym, but NOT an initialism.

    Do we have a pedant award in the Fernies, if so you're a lock this year against the your/you're crowd.

    I do believe that when words meanings change that dictionaries are slow to change them, despite the fact they're less than 200 years old and had constant shitfights over meanings when they were being developed. I think it's somewhat silly to hold on to a historical definition if the meaning has clearly changed. No doubt I will be a hypocrite and will argue the opposite for a word I like in the future.

    Yeah - like I say - I fully expect the definition to be changed, considering the widespread misuse ('evolution') of it.
    BUT - probably the thing stopping it - is that there already IS a perfectly good word for what people think it means.
    And by changing the definition of this word - you're actually REMOVING a word from circulation, as there's no longer a word to mean what the current definition.
    If that makes sense? If they change the word "acronym" to mean "initialism" - then we no longer have a word which means "abbreviation which is pronounced as a word".

    Also - I would wear a pedantry award with pride. Words have meanings. For a fucking reason. There's a REASON that "you're" and "your" are two different spellings... they fucking MEAN two different things. The whole goddamn point of language.

    "spendthrift".... fuck. What a fluffybunny.

    They could just keep both words but update the definition of acronym to include the new (and retain the old, they do that right?)

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #682

    @Nepia said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Nepia said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @dogmeat said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    And don't get me started on "acronym"... although I hate to admit defeat, I 'm starting to think the dictionaries should just fucking surrender and update the definition of that word to mean what every fluffybunny thinks it means.

    So, again, I had to look up the definition of the word to see if I had it wrong. I don't - so how is it being misused?

    The one that got me was ironical. I would hear people using it and think 'how ironic'. Then I discovered. Ironical is an actual word. That means ironic. Go figure....

    Acronym - most people use it in place of the correct word - "initialism".
    eg: FBI - is NOT an acronym. Because it's pronounced "Eff-Bee-Aye"... spelling out the letters. It's an initialism.
    But POTUS - IS an acronym (AND an initiatlism) - because it's pronounced as a "word" - this being the key bit that people ignore.
    NZRU - initialism, not acronym.
    Laser - acronym, and initialism.
    Oh - and I think the definitions are subtly different in various dictionaries, but to my understanding - an acronym is not ALWAYS an initialism.
    eg: Benelux - IS an acronym, but NOT an initialism.

    Do we have a pedant award in the Fernies, if so you're a lock this year against the your/you're crowd.

    I do believe that when words meanings change that dictionaries are slow to change them, despite the fact they're less than 200 years old and had constant shitfights over meanings when they were being developed. I think it's somewhat silly to hold on to a historical definition if the meaning has clearly changed. No doubt I will be a hypocrite and will argue the opposite for a word I like in the future.

    Yeah - like I say - I fully expect the definition to be changed, considering the widespread misuse ('evolution') of it.
    BUT - probably the thing stopping it - is that there already IS a perfectly good word for what people think it means.
    And by changing the definition of this word - you're actually REMOVING a word from circulation, as there's no longer a word to mean what the current definition.
    If that makes sense? If they change the word "acronym" to mean "initialism" - then we no longer have a word which means "abbreviation which is pronounced as a word".

    Also - I would wear a pedantry award with pride. Words have meanings. For a fucking reason. There's a REASON that "you're" and "your" are two different spellings... they fucking MEAN two different things. The whole goddamn point of language.

    "spendthrift".... fuck. What a fluffybunny.

    They could just keep both words but update the definition of acronym to include the new (and retain the old, they do that right?)

    Booooo.

    Fuck that. You're trying to take away the only moral high ground I've ever had.
    Flatten the hill I've pegged out to die on.

    Goddamn monster.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #683

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Nepia said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Nepia said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @dogmeat said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    @Kruse said in The thread of learning something new every day:

    And don't get me started on "acronym"... although I hate to admit defeat, I 'm starting to think the dictionaries should just fucking surrender and update the definition of that word to mean what every fluffybunny thinks it means.

    So, again, I had to look up the definition of the word to see if I had it wrong. I don't - so how is it being misused?

    The one that got me was ironical. I would hear people using it and think 'how ironic'. Then I discovered. Ironical is an actual word. That means ironic. Go figure....

    Acronym - most people use it in place of the correct word - "initialism".
    eg: FBI - is NOT an acronym. Because it's pronounced "Eff-Bee-Aye"... spelling out the letters. It's an initialism.
    But POTUS - IS an acronym (AND an initiatlism) - because it's pronounced as a "word" - this being the key bit that people ignore.
    NZRU - initialism, not acronym.
    Laser - acronym, and initialism.
    Oh - and I think the definitions are subtly different in various dictionaries, but to my understanding - an acronym is not ALWAYS an initialism.
    eg: Benelux - IS an acronym, but NOT an initialism.

    Do we have a pedant award in the Fernies, if so you're a lock this year against the your/you're crowd.

    I do believe that when words meanings change that dictionaries are slow to change them, despite the fact they're less than 200 years old and had constant shitfights over meanings when they were being developed. I think it's somewhat silly to hold on to a historical definition if the meaning has clearly changed. No doubt I will be a hypocrite and will argue the opposite for a word I like in the future.

    Yeah - like I say - I fully expect the definition to be changed, considering the widespread misuse ('evolution') of it.
    BUT - probably the thing stopping it - is that there already IS a perfectly good word for what people think it means.
    And by changing the definition of this word - you're actually REMOVING a word from circulation, as there's no longer a word to mean what the current definition.
    If that makes sense? If they change the word "acronym" to mean "initialism" - then we no longer have a word which means "abbreviation which is pronounced as a word".

    Also - I would wear a pedantry award with pride. Words have meanings. For a fucking reason. There's a REASON that "you're" and "your" are two different spellings... they fucking MEAN two different things. The whole goddamn point of language.

    "spendthrift".... fuck. What a fluffybunny.

    They could just keep both words but update the definition of acronym to include the new (and retain the old, they do that right?)

    Booooo.

    Fuck that. You're trying to take away the only moral high ground I've ever had.
    Flatten the hill I've pegged out to die on.

    Goddamn monster.

    My bad, I withdraw my comment, a man should never interfere with another mans hill to die on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

The thread of learning something new every day
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.