SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs
-
@mattasaurus said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@taniwharugby said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Am I allowed to say fuck these captains referrals?
In the loudest possible way mate👍
They only get one to use. I don’t have an issue with them. Just like the video ref they will clean up the game and their will be less things missed.
-
@gt12 the Chiefs are well in it. Hopefully Damian moves in to 10 heading into the latter stages of this game. He has been exceptional there this season.
-
@machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@bones and?
Sigh. How many penalties against the crusaders for doing the exact same?
Two high tackle penalties against the chiefs that are pretty lame and they get a warning. Crusaders?
Right, I see. So the main reason it was two in a row, one straight after the other. That matters in rugby
Oh well, if you're talking about the high tackles, it wasn't. If you're talking about getting on the wrong side of the tackle, if it matters why didn't the saders get penalised?
-
@bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@bones said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@bones and?
Sigh. How many penalties against the crusaders for doing the exact same?
Two high tackle penalties against the chiefs that are pretty lame and they get a warning. Crusaders?
Right, I see. So the main reason it was two in a row, one straight after the other. That matters in rugby
Oh well, if you're talking about the high tackles, it wasn't. If you're talking about getting on the wrong side of the tackle, if it matters why didn't the saders get penalised?
I dunno, too many beers to remember that far back. I think there will be a card for either (probably both) soon.
-
@canes4life said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@gt12 the Chiefs are well in it. Hopefully Damian moves in to 10 heading into the latter stages of this game. He has been exceptional there this season.
Its our best chance even though he’s just as likely to do something stupid.
I just wish we’d taken a chance on a lock (like Lord) with a bit of size.
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Entertaining game.
Jacobson and Leicester playing themselves into ABs. Havili must be AB 12.
Bridge least dangerous Crusaders back.
Yeah I dunt want to see bridge in the ABs squad
Roger Randle lol
-
- Havili 13. ALB how good does that look later this year
-
@machpants said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
@kiwimurph said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Entertaining game.
Jacobson and Leicester playing themselves into ABs. Havili must be AB 12.
Bridge least dangerous Crusaders back.
Yeah I dunt want to see bridge in the ABs squad
With Clarke away, I will bet everything in my wallet that Fozzie starts him.
-
@yeahtheboys said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
- Havili 13. ALB how good does that look later this year
They have to try it.
@Duluth picked it ages ago.
-
@yeahtheboys said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
- Havili 13. ALB how good does that look later this year
Yep, I dont mind Ioane there in 13, just cos he's a point of difference and it's Fiji. Hopefully he can show his awesomeness in the black jersey. ALB bench cos he's great cover
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
Bridge least dangerous Crusaders back.
Thanks for informing me he was playing
-
@yeahtheboys said in SRA: Final. Crusaders vs Chiefs:
- Havili 13. ALB how good does that look later this year
I dont see any other option. Watching ALB , he just has to be the 1st midfielder picked. Best defender, best reader of the game, makes almost no mistakes, unselfish and dangerous. The qn then is whomis the best 12 or 13 partner with him? Is there a better 13 out there than Havili is a 12?
I dont think so
-
Is the TMO on the shitter? How do you miss that deliberate infringement?
