SF Crusaders v Blues
-
-
-
@ACT-Crusader said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
One of the shortest highlight packages of the season
One of the shortest (looks at Reece: 'and slowest') highlight packages of the season
-
Anyone know Doleman's favourite numbers?
Got 11 as my first number in the lottery (British Indian who survived the air crash).
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
Well that was a lot better effort than the rubbish effort the Blues put forth in the same semi vs Crusaders 2 years ago under Leon
Credit to Vern and Co.
They are a good side and I was genuine when I thought they would win tonight. Despite having Beaudie at 10, they do play a more patient gameplan and then a strangling style of D that got them to this point.
-
@Bovidae said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
The stats say that EB made as many tackles as the three starting Blues loose forwards combined.
Does it say how many of those were dominant? I hope they didn't count the "tackle" on Caleb Clarke....
The Blues loosies were outplayed tonight. Hoskins had a night to forget
-
@canefan said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@Bovidae said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
The stats say that EB made as many tackles as the three starting Blues loose forwards combined.
Does it say how many of those were dominant? I hope they didn't count the "tackle" on Caleb Clarke....
The Blues loosies were outplayed tonight. Hoskins had a night to forget
Apart from Blackadder there was not a lot in it.
The forwards both won their fair share of possession and in the end it took Will Jordan to seal the deal for the Crusaders.
-
Most of those tackles from standing next to the ruck as the Blues went for the very narrow attack. Easier to rack up the stats in that situation.
Thought there was multiple obvious penalties beyond the 80th minute but Doleman disagreed
Go the Chiefs. They’ve been the best side all year, hopefully they finally finish a season off
-
@Wapiti said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@KiwiMurph a loss is a a loss is a loss…
As a fan - not exactly. Two years ago I was angry at a pathetic Blues performance. This year not the case.
-
-
@game_film said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@Jet Unintentional, yes. But some of the worst technique I’ve ever seen. They needed 10 mins on the bench for the coaches to teach them how to tackle again.
Sotutu got lucky Fihaki stepped. If he didn't, he was just barrelling for his head. That was genuinely woeful technique, and was an absolute brain fade.
-
@frugby said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@game_film said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@Jet Unintentional, yes. But some of the worst technique I’ve ever seen. They needed 10 mins on the bench for the coaches to teach them how to tackle again.
Sotutu got lucky Fihaki stepped. If he didn't, he was just barrelling for his head. That was genuinely woeful technique, and was an absolute brain fade.
Ennor's wasn't much better.
From the kickoff/restart he flew up - had plenty of time to change his approach - was asking for trouble.
-
@Wapiti said in SF Crusaders v Blues:
@KiwiMurph maybe true for today, but 2 seasons ago the Blues won 10 lost 5, this year won 7 lost 9, knocked out at the same stage each year. So you can’t be happy with this season.
Winning 10 and losing 5 doesn't mean much when you get pumped as badly as what happened 2 years ago. It was embarrassing. Preferred this season - went down swinging.
-
Crusades loosies were impressive and influenced the result heaps. Reihana and Jordan v good too.
Thought Ricky went out with a big bang for Blues. You couldn't ask more. And I felt F Christie went well, and Reiko was much improved.Will be interesting to see if Newell can do another 80 next week. Taylor seemed to wilt this week.
Well done Crusaders.
