Coronavirus - Overall
-
@dogmeat said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Snowy They can't live outside their host cell They are inert chemical sequences of RNA or DNA. when it enters a host cell it sheds its coat, bares its genes and induces the cell’s own replication machinery to reproduce its DNA or RNA until it literally bursts the cell and goes looking for others.
So it reproduces but that's all it does. Most definitions for life include other characteristics like movement, growth and creation of energy.
So viruses are on the boundary of life. Strangely the most alive organisms are apparently simple amoeba - we are somewhere in the middle of the continuum.
At least that's what I took them to be saying. @Tim will probably debunk all the above
Yeah well 6th form was 34 years ago ...
-
South Africa has recorded 60% more excess deaths than expected. The country saw about 17,000 extra deaths from natural causes – or 50% more than would normally be expected between early May and mid-July, scientists have said, suggesting many more people are dying of Covid-19 than shown in official figures.
Interesting, as back on 18 June, when this article ( https://www.bbc.com/news/world-53073046 ) came out, SA had 7k 'excess lives' up until to 02 June. A negative 9% excess mortality.
-
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger What are your thoughts on Bill Gates?
I always liked Gates because Excel. Much better than Lotus 123. Also MS Dos was cheaper to own due to lower computer prices (half the price of IMB computers). So credit to Gates. Even though he got his start thanks to his mother and IBM. So without being born into an elite family he would be another unknown in the world.
But he was always came across as a strange nerdy type that was obsessed with money and control. And still is. He’s been very successful. But one big failure is giving money away (worth when he started $52 billion now $104 billion). Or is this just marketing hype. Where he claims to want to give his money away but doesn’t and is just using his foundation to reduce his tax bill. And to market himself as he sets up his next money making schemes (digital certificates and vaccines etc).
But credit to Gates. He has everything lined up to make a fortune. He invested in imperial college where they just happened to produce via Neil Ferguson the scary inflated estimated Coved 19 deaths that seemed to kick this all off. He is a big investor in WHO. Is mates and has invested in Dr Fauci etc. etc. etc. And his marketing team has done a brilliant job. His image has changed from a nerdy control freak who violated antitrust laws to a kind of world saviour.
One last point. He needs to choose his friends and foundation investors more carefully.
-
@Winger said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger What are your thoughts on Bill Gates?
I always liked Gates because Excel. Much better than Lotus 123. Also MS Dos was cheaper to own due to lower computer prices (half the price of IMB computers). So credit to Gates. Even though he got his start thanks to his mother and IBM. So without being born into an elite family he would be another unknown in the world.
But he was always came across as a strange nerdy type that was obsessed with money and control. And still is. He’s been very successful. But one big failure is giving money away (worth when he started $52 billion now $104 billion). Or is this just marketing hype. Where he claims to want to give his money away but doesn’t and is just using his foundation to reduce his tax bill. And to market himself as he sets up his next money making schemes (digital certificates and vaccines etc).
But credit to Gates. He has everything lined up to make a fortune. He invested in imperial college where they just happened to produce via Neil Ferguson the scary inflated estimated Coved 19 deaths that seemed to kick this all off. He is a big investor in WHO. Is mates and has invested in Dr Fauci etc. etc. etc. And his marketing team has done a brilliant job. His image has changed from a nerdy control freak who violated antitrust laws to a kind of world saviour.
One last point. He needs to choose his friends and foundation investors more carefully.
Was the last line an Epstein jab? Dodgy territory for a Trump fan.
But back to Gates, it’s true he’s increased his wealth but with like most things you see in black and white you are missing a bit of nuance.
His reported net wealth includes his charitable foundation for starters. They key point is that he has given away $50 billion to charities over the years. No matter how you cut it, that’s amazing. Also impressive is him convincing other billionaires to do the same.
His foundation is doing remarkable work, just looking at his vaccine work and halving child mortality in the last 15years, particularly in the third world.
Do you think he’s planning to microchip people?
-
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger What are your thoughts on Bill Gates?
I always liked Gates because Excel. Much better than Lotus 123. Also MS Dos was cheaper to own due to lower computer prices (half the price of IMB computers). So credit to Gates. Even though he got his start thanks to his mother and IBM. So without being born into an elite family he would be another unknown in the world.
But he was always came across as a strange nerdy type that was obsessed with money and control. And still is. He’s been very successful. But one big failure is giving money away (worth when he started $52 billion now $104 billion). Or is this just marketing hype. Where he claims to want to give his money away but doesn’t and is just using his foundation to reduce his tax bill. And to market himself as he sets up his next money making schemes (digital certificates and vaccines etc).
But credit to Gates. He has everything lined up to make a fortune. He invested in imperial college where they just happened to produce via Neil Ferguson the scary inflated estimated Coved 19 deaths that seemed to kick this all off. He is a big investor in WHO. Is mates and has invested in Dr Fauci etc. etc. etc. And his marketing team has done a brilliant job. His image has changed from a nerdy control freak who violated antitrust laws to a kind of world saviour.
One last point. He needs to choose his friends and foundation investors more carefully.
Was the last line an Epstein jab? Dodgy territory for a Trump fan.
But back to Gates, it’s true he’s increased his wealth but with like most things you see in black and white you are missing a bit of nuance.
His reported net wealth includes his charitable foundation for starters. They key point is that he has given away $50 billion to charities over the years. No matter how you cut it, that’s amazing. Also impressive is him convincing other billionaires to do the same.
His foundation is doing remarkable work, just looking at his vaccine work and halving child mortality in the last 15years, particularly in the third world.
Do you think he’s planning to microchip people?
Antivaxxers would not see his vaccine work as a good thing....
-
@canefan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger What are your thoughts on Bill Gates?
I always liked Gates because Excel. Much better than Lotus 123. Also MS Dos was cheaper to own due to lower computer prices (half the price of IMB computers). So credit to Gates. Even though he got his start thanks to his mother and IBM. So without being born into an elite family he would be another unknown in the world.
But he was always came across as a strange nerdy type that was obsessed with money and control. And still is. He’s been very successful. But one big failure is giving money away (worth when he started $52 billion now $104 billion). Or is this just marketing hype. Where he claims to want to give his money away but doesn’t and is just using his foundation to reduce his tax bill. And to market himself as he sets up his next money making schemes (digital certificates and vaccines etc).
But credit to Gates. He has everything lined up to make a fortune. He invested in imperial college where they just happened to produce via Neil Ferguson the scary inflated estimated Coved 19 deaths that seemed to kick this all off. He is a big investor in WHO. Is mates and has invested in Dr Fauci etc. etc. etc. And his marketing team has done a brilliant job. His image has changed from a nerdy control freak who violated antitrust laws to a kind of world saviour.
One last point. He needs to choose his friends and foundation investors more carefully.
Was the last line an Epstein jab? Dodgy territory for a Trump fan.
But back to Gates, it’s true he’s increased his wealth but with like most things you see in black and white you are missing a bit of nuance.
His reported net wealth includes his charitable foundation for starters. They key point is that he has given away $50 billion to charities over the years. No matter how you cut it, that’s amazing. Also impressive is him convincing other billionaires to do the same.
His foundation is doing remarkable work, just looking at his vaccine work and halving child mortality in the last 15years, particularly in the third world.
Do you think he’s planning to microchip people?
Antivaxxers would not see his vaccine work as a good thing....
Facts don’t care about feelings.
-
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger What are your thoughts on Bill Gates?
I always liked Gates because Excel. Much better than Lotus 123. Also MS Dos was cheaper to own due to lower computer prices (half the price of IMB computers). So credit to Gates. Even though he got his start thanks to his mother and IBM. So without being born into an elite family he would be another unknown in the world.
But he was always came across as a strange nerdy type that was obsessed with money and control. And still is. He’s been very successful. But one big failure is giving money away (worth when he started $52 billion now $104 billion). Or is this just marketing hype. Where he claims to want to give his money away but doesn’t and is just using his foundation to reduce his tax bill. And to market himself as he sets up his next money making schemes (digital certificates and vaccines etc).
But credit to Gates. He has everything lined up to make a fortune. He invested in imperial college where they just happened to produce via Neil Ferguson the scary inflated estimated Coved 19 deaths that seemed to kick this all off. He is a big investor in WHO. Is mates and has invested in Dr Fauci etc. etc. etc. And his marketing team has done a brilliant job. His image has changed from a nerdy control freak who violated antitrust laws to a kind of world saviour.
One last point. He needs to choose his friends and foundation investors more carefully.
Was the last line an Epstein jab? Dodgy territory for a Trump fan.
But back to Gates, it’s true he’s increased his wealth but with like most things you see in black and white you are missing a bit of nuance.
His reported net wealth includes his charitable foundation for starters. They key point is that he has given away $50 billion to charities over the years. No matter how you cut it, that’s amazing. Also impressive is him convincing other billionaires to do the same.
His foundation is doing remarkable work, just looking at his vaccine work and halving child mortality in the last 15years, particularly in the third world.
Do you think he’s planning to microchip people?
Antivaxxers would not see his vaccine work as a good thing....
Facts don’t care about feelings.
Stop having so much fun.
-
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger What are your thoughts on Bill Gates?
I always liked Gates because Excel. Much better than Lotus 123. Also MS Dos was cheaper to own due to lower computer prices (half the price of IMB computers). So credit to Gates. Even though he got his start thanks to his mother and IBM. So without being born into an elite family he would be another unknown in the world.
But he was always came across as a strange nerdy type that was obsessed with money and control. And still is. He’s been very successful. But one big failure is giving money away (worth when he started $52 billion now $104 billion). Or is this just marketing hype. Where he claims to want to give his money away but doesn’t and is just using his foundation to reduce his tax bill. And to market himself as he sets up his next money making schemes (digital certificates and vaccines etc).
But credit to Gates. He has everything lined up to make a fortune. He invested in imperial college where they just happened to produce via Neil Ferguson the scary inflated estimated Coved 19 deaths that seemed to kick this all off. He is a big investor in WHO. Is mates and has invested in Dr Fauci etc. etc. etc. And his marketing team has done a brilliant job. His image has changed from a nerdy control freak who violated antitrust laws to a kind of world saviour.
One last point. He needs to choose his friends and foundation investors more carefully.
Was the last line an Epstein jab? Dodgy territory for a Trump fan.
But back to Gates, it’s true he’s increased his wealth but with like most things you see in black and white you are missing a bit of nuance.
His reported net wealth includes his charitable foundation for starters. They key point is that he has given away $50 billion to charities over the years. No matter how you cut it, that’s amazing. Also impressive is him convincing other billionaires to do the same.
His foundation is doing remarkable work, just looking at his vaccine work and halving child mortality in the last 15years, particularly in the third world.
Do you think he’s planning to microchip people?
Antivaxxers would not see his vaccine work as a good thing....
Facts don’t care about feelings.
but, but homeopathy? Crystals? essential oils?
-
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger What are your thoughts on Bill Gates?
I always liked Gates because Excel. Much better than Lotus 123. Also MS Dos was cheaper to own due to lower computer prices (half the price of IMB computers). So credit to Gates. Even though he got his start thanks to his mother and IBM. So without being born into an elite family he would be another unknown in the world.
But he was always came across as a strange nerdy type that was obsessed with money and control. And still is. He’s been very successful. But one big failure is giving money away (worth when he started $52 billion now $104 billion). Or is this just marketing hype. Where he claims to want to give his money away but doesn’t and is just using his foundation to reduce his tax bill. And to market himself as he sets up his next money making schemes (digital certificates and vaccines etc).
But credit to Gates. He has everything lined up to make a fortune. He invested in imperial college where they just happened to produce via Neil Ferguson the scary inflated estimated Coved 19 deaths that seemed to kick this all off. He is a big investor in WHO. Is mates and has invested in Dr Fauci etc. etc. etc. And his marketing team has done a brilliant job. His image has changed from a nerdy control freak who violated antitrust laws to a kind of world saviour.
One last point. He needs to choose his friends and foundation investors more carefully.
Was the last line an Epstein jab? Dodgy territory for a Trump fan.
But back to Gates, it’s true he’s increased his wealth but with like most things you see in black and white you are missing a bit of nuance.
His reported net wealth includes his charitable foundation for starters. They key point is that he has given away $50 billion to charities over the years. No matter how you cut it, that’s amazing. Also impressive is him convincing other billionaires to do the same.
His foundation is doing remarkable work, just looking at his vaccine work and halving child mortality in the last 15years, particularly in the third world.
Do you think he’s planning to microchip people?
Antivaxxers would not see his vaccine work as a good thing....
Facts don’t care about feelings.
The facts are that people who follow a more natural approach are often healthier than people who don't. And instead rely on big pharma and lots and lots and lots of pills and injections to make them right.
The 2nd fact is we have had vaccines and lots of big pharma drugs for many years now, Yet here we are. People are so scared of the yearly flu that the economy has been ruined. And people willingly wear masks (that likely do more harm than good) and want everyone else to do likewise and are afraid of getting too close to someone else(even their grandchildren for example) just in case. Its like a collective madness. Where people think we will only be saved by big pharma pill popping or injections.Maybe its time to try a different approach. Rather than even more and more pills (I have meet people who take pills to counter the side effects of other pills) and even more vaccines (compulsory vaccines won't stop at 1). It might be good for big pharma but I don't see overall a healthy population.
-
@Winger said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@canefan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Kirwan said in Coronavirus - Overall:
@Winger What are your thoughts on Bill Gates?
I always liked Gates because Excel. Much better than Lotus 123. Also MS Dos was cheaper to own due to lower computer prices (half the price of IMB computers). So credit to Gates. Even though he got his start thanks to his mother and IBM. So without being born into an elite family he would be another unknown in the world.
But he was always came across as a strange nerdy type that was obsessed with money and control. And still is. He’s been very successful. But one big failure is giving money away (worth when he started $52 billion now $104 billion). Or is this just marketing hype. Where he claims to want to give his money away but doesn’t and is just using his foundation to reduce his tax bill. And to market himself as he sets up his next money making schemes (digital certificates and vaccines etc).
But credit to Gates. He has everything lined up to make a fortune. He invested in imperial college where they just happened to produce via Neil Ferguson the scary inflated estimated Coved 19 deaths that seemed to kick this all off. He is a big investor in WHO. Is mates and has invested in Dr Fauci etc. etc. etc. And his marketing team has done a brilliant job. His image has changed from a nerdy control freak who violated antitrust laws to a kind of world saviour.
One last point. He needs to choose his friends and foundation investors more carefully.
Was the last line an Epstein jab? Dodgy territory for a Trump fan.
But back to Gates, it’s true he’s increased his wealth but with like most things you see in black and white you are missing a bit of nuance.
His reported net wealth includes his charitable foundation for starters. They key point is that he has given away $50 billion to charities over the years. No matter how you cut it, that’s amazing. Also impressive is him convincing other billionaires to do the same.
His foundation is doing remarkable work, just looking at his vaccine work and halving child mortality in the last 15years, particularly in the third world.
Do you think he’s planning to microchip people?
Antivaxxers would not see his vaccine work as a good thing....
Facts don’t care about feelings.
The facts are that people who follow a more natural approach are often healthier than people who don't. And instead rely on big pharma and lots and lots and lots of pills and injections to make them right.
The 2nd fact is we have had vaccines and lots of big pharma drugs for many years now, Yet here we are.Yeah, that increased life expectancy's a bitch huh?
People are so scared of the yearly flu that the economy has been ruined. And people willingly wear masks (that likely do more harm than good)
How?
and want everyone else to do likewise and are afraid of getting too close to someone else(even their grandchildren for example) just in case. Its like a collective madness. Where people think we will only be saved by big pharma pill popping or injections.
Maybe its time to try a different approach. Rather than even more and more pills (I have meet people who take pills to counter the side effects of other pills) and even more vaccines (compulsory vaccines won't stop at 1). It might be good for big pharma but I don't see overall a healthy population.