• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Final - Crusaders v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
917 Posts 75 Posters 3.6k Views
Final - Crusaders v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote last edited by
    #287

    That looks red to me, not a lot of mitigation, especially with how high Narawa was.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote last edited by
    #288

    Clear RC. How's the TMO going to find mitigation in that?

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote last edited by
    #289

    1 man down, momentum with Chiefs.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    wrote last edited by
    #290

    So a HIA

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote last edited by
    #291

    Another AB with shit tackling technique. What the hell was that?

    mariner4lifeM KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to antipodean last edited by
    #292

    @antipodean said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Clear RC. How's the TMO going to find mitigation in that?

    Coz Crusaders?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to nostrildamus last edited by
    #293

    @nostrildamus said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    1 man down, momentum with Chiefs.

    The mitigation is in the jersey.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Tim last edited by
    #294

    @Tim said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Another AB with shit tackling technique. What the hell was that?

    The old lead with the face trick

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Tim last edited by
    #295

    @Tim said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Another AB with shit tackling technique. What the hell was that?

    There's a way to fix that. And I don't mean the technique.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote last edited by
    #296

    So why hasn’t Narawa gone off for an HIA ..?

    ACT CrusaderA BonesB canefanC 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • CanerbryC Offline
    CanerbryC Offline
    Canerbry
    wrote last edited by
    #297

    That was but a hongi.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Frank last edited by
    #298

    @Frank said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Nepia said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    And Scooter does his first push in the side and then flop over the ruck.

    Whinging about the Saders supposed "cheating" is tiresome.
    You sound like an Aussie.

    Calm down, I made a comment about what happened at the ruck. Are we not allowed to comment on what happens in the game now? Or are we only allowed to comment on (rightfully crappy) Chiefs box kicks?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Steven Harris last edited by
    #299

    @Steven-Harris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    So why hasn’t Narawa gone off for an HIA ..?

    Because we are more concerned about cards and not the actual head contact

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote last edited by
    #300

    Nice fat prop try to Chiefs

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by
    #301
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Steven Harris last edited by
    #302

    @Steven-Harris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    So why hasn’t Narawa gone off for an HIA ..?

    Why should a player be forced to leave the field when he doesn't need to because of foul play from another?

    ACT CrusaderA MiketheSnowM 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Canerbry last edited by
    #303

    @Canerbry said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    That was but a hongi.

    I feel sorry for defenders in the pro game. But they know what happens when they go high

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote last edited by
    #304

    That was proper test footy stuff by the Chiefs.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to ACT Crusader last edited by
    #305

    @ACT-Crusader said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Steven-Harris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    So why hasn’t Narawa gone off for an HIA ..?

    Because we are more concerned about cards and not the actual head contact

    Don't we mention this every week when it happens?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Steven Harris last edited by
    #306

    @Steven-Harris said in Final - Crusaders v Chiefs:

    So why hasn’t Narawa gone off for an HIA ..?

    I assume the sensor wasn't triggered

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Final - Crusaders v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.