• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v France I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksfrance
1.2k Posts 87 Posters 4.9k Views
All Blacks v France I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    wrote last edited by
    #1008

    Just my two cents on the First Test.

    A continuation of many of the problems from last year – lack of focus at times, shit kicking, too much helter-skelter ant not enough patience. But many positives - things seem to be getting better with Scooter taking control when things weren’t going well and leading the way with a charge-down. Ditto, the forwards near the line showed a lot more control and fewer errors than we saw last year. Kicking may have been shit, but the exits did seem better.

    Really pleased that Robertson took the plunge and tried new things, though not sure all of them paid off…. Fabien Holland was rock solid and a good selection as was Christian Lio-Willie. I wasn’t convinced by the 6/7/8 combination and thought Ardie a bit anonymous at 7 until Kirifi came on and he was MoM material in the last 20-30 minutes. Maybe I’m being unfair, but I thought Vaa’I had a off day and wasn’t his normal work-horse self. Convinced he’s a top-class lock who can fill in at 6 if needed and a stopgap there at best.

    Roigard was rocks and diamonds. His passing & kicking looked laboured at time, but boy, he really does know when to make a break. Be interesting to see if he’s better coming off the bench against tired defences. That said, his close quarter passing game was pretty good. Have to say we are looking better at 9 than anyone would have thought 12 months ago.

    Where to start with Beauden Barrett? Some great pop-passes and his goal-kicking was immaculate, but he’s become predicable/robotic and seems a gnat’s todger away from flakiness at times. He’s not the answer at 10 but who else is? Does DMac fit with Robertson game plan?

    Arguably Jordie’s best game in Black. A couple of outstanding pieces of skill but what was impressive was how he anchored the midfield and did the basics so bloody well for 80 minutes. Combination with DMac was impressive. Worthy VC. Proctor had a ‘mare and that can’t be put down to debut nerves. Worth sticking with definitely, but be surprised if he starts next week,

    Reiko really didn’t have much to do but didn’t do much wrong and not sure we found out if he’s a better wing than 13. Maybe back at 13 next week with Caleb Clarke in for Reece. Jordan was Jordan - never seen a player with the knack of being in the right place at the right time as he has and you can argue he’s won us a shed-load of games. Outstanding.

    All in, pretty pleased with that result. Great game to watch and some good periods of play with a new-ish team some of whom did bloody well. Robertson and the players will take a lot away from that, particularly as it was tight game and not a blow-out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by
    #1009

    Firstly, pretty fun game of football. Both teams came yo play open footy when ever possible, and we got a lot of ball movement because of it.

    Good mature win in the end. Take the points, recognise your dominance, grind it out.

    Cheers to the French, a lot of those kids can fucking play.

    For us, my main takeaway is, guess what, fotm means something. The guys who did good did good in super too. Those who battled? Guess what.

    Same main weaknesses. Can't kick, can't hurt their ruck. Lose the air.

    Some of our shape was gorgeous
    I loved when we played direct
    Set piece good.

    So many positives for week one.

    J G 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Piranha last edited by
    #1010

    @Piranha said in All Blacks v France I:

    Super Rugby is no longer the premier competition without the Saffas it's becoming harder and harder for the ABs to build enough depth to field a dominant test side when they're only playing against themselves and the Aussies, the deck is stacked against it.

    All of the top 14 basically has 2 teams, the likes of Toulouse and Bordeaux go away from home in a top 14 game and make 16-17-18 changes to the 23, they have about 70 players who can play at test level.

    This is such a bad take - the Jaapies contributed bugger all to Super Rugby after 1996. What has fucked Super Rugby is the Aussies becoming completely dogshit, and all their best athletes going off to play league and AFL.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #1011

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

    I'm watching delayed.

    I'm at the 30 minute mark. We played excellent excellent attack. Proctor chucks a shocker. We lose a turnover, field a kick in our own end, try running it out, then kick a cross field kick to touch just outside our 22.

    We've looked so good, but we compound errors with trying something shit to remedy the error. Shit pass? Throw a 2nd risky pass to try and get out of it. Just be pragmatic FFS.

    Contrast Fikou picking up a shit pass and then just trucking it back to his forwards for a reset.

    It's the whole team as well, our first score was struck off because we tried yo turn a shit pass into a miracle

    This is like my golf game: Hit a bad shot? Why not try the miracle shot to make up for it?

    Result: End up in an even worse situation and the best I can do is a triple bogie and a lost ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by
    #1012

    Negatives?

    Our spine are dumb and why we struggle. 9, 10, 15. No control at all, no feel for tempo. Flat out, always. Playing for them must be exhausting.

    Proctor was average at 13, but he'll he saved by the fact his most likely replacement was worst on ground. Ioane is cooked, get rid.

    What the fuck do you fo either Ardie Savea? With ball in hand few are better. But in a test team? He's do selfish. He will actively avoid attacking rucks, so he can get the next run. At 7 he made no dent in the French breakdown.

    I think it's a worry that the main problems I see are guys you know will get selected every week

    J TimT J K 4 Replies Last reply
    4
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to antipodean last edited by
    #1013

    @antipodean said in All Blacks v France I:

    Terrible technique.

    Throw back to 60s.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    wrote last edited by mariner4life
    #1014

    On the TMO all were 100% correct and I can't believe there is any disagreement.

    The most grey was the obstruction but mainly because of the the wording. BB takes the ball inside the dummy runner and goes behind him. Obstruction all day.

    Proctor lost the ball cold. And so did Newell.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCorner
    wrote last edited by BerniesCorner
    #1015

    Just watched it. Not perfect but refreshing to see new players adding value.
    Barrett Holland Vaai combo worked.
    Stick with the midfield has promise.
    A few nerves from Proctor but you can see his distribution skills.
    Roigard good distribution.
    Vaai and BB very good (apart from cross kick)
    France great effort.
    I was tense to the 75th minute

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to junior last edited by
    #1016

    @junior said in All Blacks v France I:

    @Bones said in All Blacks v France I:

    @voodoo said in All Blacks v France I:

    @Bones said in All Blacks v France I:

    @voodoo said in All Blacks v France I:

    @Bones said in All Blacks v France I:

    @voodoo said in All Blacks v France I:

    There was no contact

    You might want to double check who's talking nonsense.

    Have checked

    It’s not me

    But thanks for asking

    I checked out of reading the rest as you started with a blatant lie. Are you really saying Tosi didn't make contact? It makes anything else you try to say, redundant.

    @Bones said in All Blacks v France I:

    @voodoo said in All Blacks v France I:

    @Bones said in All Blacks v France I:

    @voodoo said in All Blacks v France I:

    There was no contact

    You might want to double check who's talking nonsense.

    Have checked

    It’s not me

    But thanks for asking

    I checked out of reading the rest as you started with a blatant lie. Are you really saying Tosi didn't make contact? It makes anything else you try to say, redundant.

    I said innocuous originally. No material contact. Nothing that impeded him sufficiently to change the play. As Antipodean said, it didn’t even change their coverage

    But I’ve been on this forum long enough to know the futility of arguing with you so I’ll leave it at that

    Well that's one way to concede, glad we agree there was contact.

    Yes, there was contact but rugby referees apply the materiality* principle in so many other aspects of the game, why couldn't they apply it here? Why do the TMOs never apply the materiality* principle?

    *For those who are hard of thinking, the materiality principle holds that only those infringements that have a material impact on the game should be penalised - see each and every ruck for how this principle is and generally should be applied.

    I've seen BB shit the bed enough times to know that even the threat of being marked could result in a markedly different outcome. Materially.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #1017

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

    Firstly, pretty fun game of football. Both teams came yo play open footy when ever possible, and we got a lot of ball movement because of it.

    Good mature win in the end. Take the points, recognise your dominance, grind it out.

    Cheers to the French, a lot of those kids can fucking play.

    For us, my main takeaway is, guess what, fotm means something. The guys who did good did good in super too. Those who battled? Guess what.

    Same main weaknesses. Can't kick, can't hurt their ruck. Lose the air.

    Some of our shape was gorgeous
    I loved when we played direct
    Set piece good.

    So many positives for week one.

    The tram line ruck and box kick is now part of the set piece and basics of the game at test level. We need to train and select accordingly.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #1018

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

    Negatives?

    Our spine are dumb and why we struggle. 9, 10, 15. No control at all, no feel for tempo. Flat out, always. Playing for them must be exhausting.

    Proctor was average at 13, but he'll he saved by the fact his most likely replacement was worst on ground. Ioane is cooked, get rid.

    What the fuck do you fo either Ardie Savea? With ball in hand few are better. But in a test team? He's do selfish. He will actively avoid attacking rucks, so he can get the next run. At 7 he made no dent in the French breakdown.

    I think it's a worry that the main problems I see are guys you know will get selected every week

    BB and DM are two of the most articulate guys in the team but that lead us to being fooled into thinking they are clever the same way we all think a bloke with a posh English accent is a MENSA-level genius despite being a complete retard.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote last edited by
    #1019

    Plaudits to French XV.
    Some uncommented on elements.
    EDG very good at basics.
    Vaa’i/Holland/Finau markedly more dynamic than the staring combo with Scooter.
    Starting loosies didn’t gel. RD doesn’t give you much cleaning and only occasional jackalling, so the trio requires someone who does. Finishing 3 better but I’d say Paps/Finau/RD would have been much more balanced.
    Back three much more dangerous with DMac at 15 and WillJ at 14.
    The French close in defence had so much more ‘stopping power’ than ours. AND seemed to be well below head height.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #1020

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

    What the fuck do you fo either Ardie Savea? With ball in hand few are better. But in a test team? He's do selfish. He will actively avoid attacking rucks, so he can get the next run.

    He is fuxking garage at 7. Absolutely worthless. Even his moronic Canes fans will not pump that performance. This has been very well established since 2019, yet here we are again, because New Zealand is run by the dumbest guys you knew at university.

    What does he do well as a 7? Nothing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote last edited by
    #1021

    Canes fans that are so below normal IQ that they will turn up and say that Proctor was pretty good. When his defence was a continuation of every shit performance in every super rugby play off game.

    The Brumbies destroyed him and Krifi, another joke selection. The Lions will beat Australia by 20 points in every game.

    But here we are with a coach who cannot read, and so many shit loose forwards.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote last edited by
    #1022

    Same shit for the last six years.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    replied to mariner4life last edited by
    #1023

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

    Negatives?

    Our spine are dumb and why we struggle. 9, 10, 15. No control at all, no feel for tempo. Flat out, always. Playing for them must be exhausting.

    Proctor was average at 13, but he'll he saved by the fact his most likely replacement was worst on ground. Ioane is cooked, get rid.

    What the fuck do you fo either Ardie Savea? With ball in hand few are better. But in a test team? He's do selfish. He will actively avoid attacking rucks, so he can get the next run. At 7 he made no dent in the French breakdown.

    I think it's a worry that the main problems I see are guys you know will get selected every week

    We have a Savea problem and a Barrett problem.

    They upset the apple cart but their highlight reel is seductive.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    replied to Victor Meldrew last edited by Jet
    #1024

    @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v France I:

    @His-Bobness said in All Blacks v France I:

    @sparky In which case, as Jet says above, we need to take the gloves off and stop being nice guys. Go the
    Razzie route and start punching heads at
    World Rugby. Sic the advertisers onto the unaccountable Hooray Henrys and bumbling administrators elevated way above their station who are terrified of lawyers and the club owners. That’s what’s going on here. And if they’re not corrupt, they’re incompetent. Take your pick. Neither is good.

    We could take the gloves off and be nice guys. Let the others bleat and moan, we should be strong enough to raise controversial, contentious issues and argue them in a convincing way without being dickheads.

    PS. Tks for the heads-up on Foster's book.

    I think it has to be done publicly (concurrently with official channels) so they have nowhere to hide.

    Smart use of press conferences etc.

    For example, in the Irish series.

    "We had a player sent off last week for accidental head on head contact (Taavao), we get that player safety is paramount and they want to encourage players to tackle lower so its fine by us".

    "However Brodie Retallick now has a broken eye socket from a shoulder to the head from a tackler who was upright and he received a lesser sanction".

    "this is inconsistent with world rugbys desire to reduce concussions"

    "the differing outcomes affected both games"

    "the ref used the terminology of soak tackle as mitigation which is not in the laws or tacking framework"

    "we will be speaking to world rugby about why both transgressions were reffed differently".

    Now it wouldnt get us a changed result in the game just played, we still lost, but maybe Kolisi gets red one year hence in the RWC final (Both games reffed by Barnes).

    If you have cried hypocrisy and double standards to the media, and Cane walks for his tackle on Kriel, its fresh in everyones mind once the big screen is showing Kolisi drawing blood from Ardies nose.

    The behind closed doors stuff has achieved nothing.

    The squeaky hinge gets the grease.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    10
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote last edited by
    #1025

    Incoming sentiment analysis of this game vs 2020 Wellington

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    replied to Jet last edited by
    #1026

    @Jet said in All Blacks v France I:

    @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks v France I:

    @His-Bobness said in All Blacks v France I:

    @sparky In which case, as Jet says above, we need to take the gloves off and stop being nice guys. Go the
    Razzie route and start punching heads at
    World Rugby. Sic the advertisers onto the unaccountable Hooray Henrys and bumbling administrators elevated way above their station who are terrified of lawyers and the club owners. That’s what’s going on here. And if they’re not corrupt, they’re incompetent. Take your pick. Neither is good.

    We could take the gloves off and be nice guys. Let the others bleat and moan, we should be strong enough to raise controversial, contentious issues and argue them in a convincing way without being dickheads.

    PS. Tks for the heads-up on Foster's book.

    I think it has to be done publicly (concurrently with official channels) so they have nowhere to hide.

    Smart use of press conferences etc.

    For example, in the Irish series.

    "We had a player sent off last week for accidental head on head contact (Taavao), we get that player safety is paramount and they want to encourage players to tackle lower so its fine by us".

    "However Brodie Retallick now has a broken eye socket from a shoulder to the head from a tackler who was upright and he received a lesser sanction".

    "this is inconsistent with world rugbys desire to reduce concussions"

    "the differing outcomes affected both games"

    "the ref used the terminology of soak tackle as mitigation which is not in the laws or tacking framework"

    "we will be speaking to world rugby about why both transgressions were reffed differently".

    Now it wouldnt get us a changed result in the game just played, we still lost, but maybe Kolisi gets red one year hence in the RWC final (Both games reffed by Barnes).

    If you have cried hypocrisy and double standards to the media, and Cane walks for his tackle on Kriel, its fresh in everyones mind once the big screen is showing Kolisi drawing blood from Ardies nose.

    The behind closed doors stuff has achieved nothing.

    The squeaky hinge gets the grease.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote last edited by sparky
    #1027

    Given their new Lock partnership looks likely to stay the All Blacks should be looking to get a sponsorship from this well-known chain of British health stores: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holland_%26_Barrett

    Holland & Barrett - UK's Leading Health & Wellbeing Store
    1 Reply Last reply
    11

All Blacks v France I
Rugby Matches
allblacksfrance
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.