• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Exodus 2018

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.0k Posts 74 Posters 126.1k Views
Exodus 2018
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to family man on last edited by
    #323

    @family-man said in Exodus 2018:

    @crucial I understand the point you make but as there is no junior all blacks team and has not been for a few years now(in that respect) the Nz 7’s are in Nz terms the 2nd team until therjunior all blacks start up again

    You are talking about 2 entirely different things though.

    We have never used the 7s to lock in players for XVs but players do know that under WR rules they are committed once they play (Olympic thing aside)

    I get what you are saying as well but the 7s are not (and never have been) our 2nd team. They are a different method of eligibility setting.

    We simply do not play a '2nd team' (except when selecting the first team against a minnow nation)

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to family man on last edited by
    #324

    @family-man said in Exodus 2018:

    @crucial I understand the point you make but as there is no junior all blacks team and has not been for a few years now(in that respect) the Nz 7’s are in Nz terms the 2nd team until therjunior all blacks start up again

    Ok. I get your point. You're right in the first part of this statement but wrong in semantics. 7s are not the 2nd team by definition but they are because there NZR don't run an A team. They are not the Second Team, they are the second team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jauzy019
    wrote on last edited by
    #325

    Hello guys, i'm looking for a good NZ scrumhalf who isn't part of a Super Rugby squad. Can you help me please ?

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #326

    @taniwharugby

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kiwidom
    replied to jauzy019 on last edited by
    #327

    @jauzy019 There isn't too many good halfbacks without a super contract at present. Am thinking of Billy Guyton, kylem O'Donnell, Té Aihe Toma, jono hickey and Chris smiley (whose getting on a bit in age now). O'Donnell looked pretty good at times for taranaki last season though

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #328

    Thought this was interesting development in light of recent discussions on here. I’ve thought for a while that there needs to collaboration between NZRU and like minded unions on development and keeping of talent.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&objectid=11987747

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to Derm McCrum on last edited by
    #329

    @pot-hale This is what happens when Ngatai gets poached, NZR goes on a war footing due to the loss of the golden one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jauzy019
    wrote on last edited by
    #330

    Jordan Taufua linked with a move to Scarlets.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to jauzy019 on last edited by
    #331

    @jauzy019 said in Exodus 2018:

    Jordan Taufua linked with a move to Scarlets.

    Tell them to go fuck themselves, Jordan!

    Nelson is great in August - Wales is wet, miserable, and full of fuckers who don't speak English you can understand. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #332

    @bones I was more a Marshall type 9, my pass was shite, and the rest of my game was suited to the side of the scrum, so I moved there when our team had a real 9.

    Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #333

    @taniwharugby

    And you’re joining the Exodus 2018...?

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #334

    @billy-tell not sure yet, havent had my call up for the Brisbane 10s....I'm in the right age bracket.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #335

    @taniwharugby said in Exodus 2018:

    @billy-tell not sure yet, havent had my call up for the Brisbane 10s....I'm in the right age bracket.

    I think the way things are going Brian Lochore better start polishing the boots in case the Canes need some extra forwards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #336

    Interesting comment from Gregor Paul here. Hard to disagree with him honestly. Although surely there is more to it and discussions have already begun for the NZRFU announcement?

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11989674

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by Nepia
    #337

    @majorrage I find it pretty easy to disagree with him, NZR are trying to think up a way to not lose so many players overseas long term. That's not arrogance. Oh, wait it is, because Paul is using the heebee jeebees to pull the subliminal messages floating out there. It makes sense for NZR to make deals with a few clubs as it does allow them a little bit of control. Whether any club would be willing to do that is another thing, but it hardly hurts NZR to try.

    Do all rugby journalists eventually just become trolls? This is the kind of article that Ratpoo would write in his on going war with NZR (and rugby in general).

    MajorRageM Billy TellB 2 Replies Last reply
    10
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #338

    You don't think there is any arrogance at all in the announcement / plans?

    They are only prepared to make plans with clubs which they feel have "sound coaching structures and support systems"? Really? It's coming across as very we own the players and we'll only let them go to clubs which we feel follow our model and way of thinking.

    Don't get me wrong - I appreciate the need to move with the times etc, but the announcement made it seem like these clubs would be almost part of the AB system. Which is Pauls' point.

    It's arrogance personified.

    NepiaN antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by Nepia
    #339

    @majorrage Why wouldn't a professional organisation want agreements with other professional organisations? Why would we not want our players to go to "sound coaching structures and support systems"?

    I'm glad the NZR are wanting to do that and not letting players go to the NH rugby equivalent of the Warriors.

    Seriously, what organisation doesn't try and make deals with the best possible other organisations they can?

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derm McCrum
    wrote on last edited by
    #340

    This is absolutely in line with my thinking so it’s a big yes from me.

    More inter union collaboration please.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #341

    @nepia said in Exodus 2018:

    @majorrage I find it pretty easy to disagree with him, NZR are trying to think up a way to not lose so many players overseas long term. That's not arrogance. Oh, wait it is, because Paul is using the heebee jeebees to pull the subliminal messages floating out there. It makes sense for NZR to make deals with a few clubs as it does allow them a little bit of control. Whether any club would be willing to do that is another thing, but it hardly hurts NZR to try.

    Do all rugby journalists eventually just become trolls? This is the kind of article that Ratpoo would write in his on going war with NZR (and rugby in general).

    +1. It was very Ratpoo-ish in content and style. Yawn.

    The NZRFU are being proactive, there won't be anything stopping off-contract players signing with whoever they want, but if they can come to an arrangement with a few targeted clubs, it could be a win-win.

    There is quite a constant chip-on-shoulder anti-NZRFU vibe from a fair few NZ journalists.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #342

    @majorrage said in Exodus 2018:

    They are only prepared to make plans with clubs which they feel have "sound coaching structures and support systems"? Really? It's coming across as very we own the players and we'll only let them go to clubs which we feel follow our model and way of thinking.

    It reads to me as the NZR saying if players want to be a hope of coming back, then they're best served by going to clubs that have structures in place to maximise that possibility. Otherwise they can go play anywhere and take their chances.

    I find it consistently amazing that New Zealand leads the world in so many aspects of rugby, but clearly comes dead last in its media driven analysis and reporting.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    7

Exodus 2018
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.