• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v India

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
823 Posts 48 Posters 66.5k Views
Black Caps v India
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #271

    Yep fucken useless Santner

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #272

    @shark said in Black Caps v India:

    Yep fucken useless Santner

    Well either him or our other 'all rounder' Doug Bracewell....

    DamoD sharkS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #273

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v India:

    @shark said in Black Caps v India:

    Yep fucken useless Santner

    Well either him or our other 'all rounder' Doug Bracewell....

    Braces is ok. He was top scorer last game and been scoring well domestically.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #274

    @MN5 both bowlers who bat a bit. Possibly less than that in that they may be bits n pieces players.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #275

    @Damo said in Black Caps v India:

    @MN5 said in Black Caps v India:

    @shark said in Black Caps v India:

    Yep fucken useless Santner

    Well either him or our other 'all rounder' Doug Bracewell....

    Braces is ok. He was top scorer last game and been scoring well domestically.

    Danny Morrison got 40 odd once. What's your point ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #276

    @shark said in Black Caps v India:

    @MN5 both bowlers who bat a bit. Possibly less than that in that they may be bits n pieces players.

    Both weak for No. 7s, but decent 8s.

    Unfortunately, Ish Sodhi's a bit weak for 9 as well. Let's hope Doug's form from the last game carries on or we'll end up with another uncompetitive score.

    Probably didn't need Tom Latham to play the shot he got out to at that point. Another three or four overs of nudging it around would have been fine.

    Definitely didn't need Nicholls to then get out cheaply!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #277

    We may not bat out our overs here. Unforgivable. Some real pressure applied on ourselves these last few overs due to some dubious selections.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #278

    We're 40 runs short of a par score and in all honesty about 80+ runs short of a winning score. We are getting smoked this series

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #279

    FFS. Taylor and Latham aside this was another disgusting effort with the willow.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #280

    Guptill and Munro are a waste of space at the moment. And Kane isn't much better

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #281

    @No-Quarter 280 might have been a decent test for India.

    I'm not sure what they've got if you get a couple of early wickets and can put the lesser lights under the grill.

    244 should be a walk in the park - but maybe we can get a couple early and make a game of it.

    Pretty much always two wickets worse off in that innings than you'd want to be (except the latter part of Taylor-Latham) - which is a major handbrake.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #282

    Full credit to Taylor and Latham for getting us to at least a semi-respectable score, but Munro and Guptill just aren't working as an opening pair. Kane is in a tiny slump, but we all know he can get out of them, so not worried about him. Santner should not be considered an all-rounder, so we have a long and weak batting tail when we play him, Sodhi, Boult, Ferguson. If Bracewell is in early, we are pretty much fucked, because those guys don't have the skill to stay long with him.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #283

    the way we've been going, Latham and Guptill to open.
    the way we've been going, Latham either gets 45 overs between when he gets out and has to keep, or his work is done for the day 5 overs into the BC's batting 2nd.
    the way we've been going, if Latham actually bats deep into the NZ innings, then we'd forgive him if he fluffed things once or twice while keeping.
    the way we've been going, Munro is part of the problem.
    so
    Guptill
    Latham
    Kane
    Rossco
    Nicholls
    6. a batter - who?

    MN5M Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #284

    @westcoastie said in Black Caps v India:

    the way we've been going, Latham and Guptill to open.
    the way we've been going, Latham either gets 45 overs between when he gets out and has to keep, or his work is done for the day 5 overs into the BC's batting 2nd.
    the way we've been going, if Latham actually bats deep into the NZ innings, then we'd forgive him if he fluffed things once or twice while keeping.
    the way we've been going, Munro is part of the problem.
    so
    Guptill
    Latham
    Kane
    Rossco
    Nicholls
    6. a batter - who?

    Neesham

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by Chris B.
    #285

    @westcoastie Possibly Neesham, which might allow de Grandhomme at 7 (those two are your fifth bowler).

    Then Boult at 11 and any three of Santner, Sodhi, Ferguson, Southee, Bracewell, Henry, Milne or Astle.

    westcoastieW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #286

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v India:

    @westcoastie Possibly Neesham, which might allow de Grandhomme at 7 (those two are your fifth bowler).

    Then Boult at 11 and any three of Santner, Sodhi, Ferguson, Southee, Bracewell, Henry, Milne or Astle.

    @westcoastie said in Black Caps v India:

    the way we've been going, Latham and Guptill to open.
    the way we've been going, Latham either gets 45 overs between when he gets out and has to keep, or his work is done for the day 5 overs into the BC's batting 2nd.
    the way we've been going, if Latham actually bats deep into the NZ innings, then we'd forgive him if he fluffed things once or twice while keeping.
    the way we've been going, Munro is part of the problem.
    so
    Guptill
    Latham
    Kane
    Rossco
    Nicholls
    6. a batter - who?

    why Neesham at 6? surely we find a genuine batter at 6? along with 5 genuine bowlers?

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #287

    We need a genuine batter who can send down 5-6 overs between the 10th and 30th over to give Kane bowling options later in the innings. Funnily enough this would be Munro? but maybe Anderson? Could we give Devcich a lash?

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #288

    @westcoastie You tell me who it is then! 🙂

    Neesham's definitely in my team - just a question of whether he bats 6 or 7.

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #289

    @westcoastie said in Black Caps v India:

    We need a genuine batter who can send down 5-6 overs between the 10th and 30th over to give Kane bowling options later in the innings. Funnily enough this would be Munro? but maybe Anderson? Could we give Devcich a lash?

    Does anyone, ANYONE, consider Munro a genuine batsman now??

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #290

    @Chris-B said in Black Caps v India:

    @westcoastie You tell me who it is then! 🙂

    Neesham's definitely in my team - just a question of whether he bats 6 or 7.

    Agree. Ok how about this: Latham goes up, Nicholls to 5, Anderson and Neesham at 6 and 7 then four bowlers. If we can't get a decent total among that top 7 with some dregs from 8-11 then why bother playing the game.

    L Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    1

Black Caps v India
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.