• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
263 Posts 44 Posters 11.5k Views
Crusaders v Chiefs
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by sparky
    #225

    @ACT-Crusader

    Disagree. They'll rotate them a bit. But Will Jordan is the better player already of the two: faster, stronger, better hands.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #226

    Havili could be useful on the bench since he covers several positions. The Crusaders are blessed with good players, this is a kind of problem the other franchises would probably like to be embarrassed with.

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #227

    So the oil out of the Chiefs camp is that the senior players are less than thrilled with Cooper and that there is a disconnect between the two. This comes as no surprise to anyone though.

    sparkyS gt12G 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #228

    @Hooroo

    I suspect the man the Chiefs players would love to be coached by is Dave Rennie, but he just signed a contract extension.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    wrote on last edited by
    #229

    Sounds like Hammett may need to come in and clear out some of the senior players.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    14
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #230

    @Hooroo No! Really? Shocking.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #231

    @Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Sounds like Hammett may need to come in and clear out some of the senior players.

    Absolutely primed for a Hammett intervention.

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #232

    @ACT-Crusader said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Sounds like Hammett may need to come in and clear out some of the senior players.

    Absolutely primed for a Hammett intervention.

    Even better, we might lure Scott Robertson home with the promise of Chiefs games at Blake Park and a post match surf at Clyde Street.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #233

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #234

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    Don't forget the 'culture change'

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #235

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    Don't forget the 'culture change'

    Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #236

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    Don't forget the 'culture change'

    Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.

    They still have BBBR, DMac, ALB and Cane in the team, moving them to other franchises is a job for Hammett.

    BonesB No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #237

    @Nepia touché.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #238

    @Nepia said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @canefan said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Bones said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    Hammett is only brought in to destroy teams and stop them making finals.

    Don't forget the 'culture change'

    Oh I haven't. But look, Chiefs are a mess already, that's not a job for Hammett.

    They still have BBBR, DMac, ALB and Cane in the team, moving them to other franchises is a job for Hammett.

    Think we need to start a Hammett for Chiefs campaign.

    BBBR and Cane can bolster the Canes pack (it's a natural fit for Cane in particular).

    DMac can head north to try and fill the hole Spencer left at 10.

    ALB could make a go of things at the Highlanders, try and get a few more "names" instead of "no-names" on their roster.

    ToddyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ToddyT Offline
    ToddyT Offline
    Toddy
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #239

    @No-Quarter it will be an awesome contest between the two giants Blackwell and BBBR for starting spot at the Canes. The Wellingtonian will probably have the edge.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Toddy on last edited by
    #240

    @Toddy said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @No-Quarter it will be an awesome contest between the two giants Blackwell and BBBR for starting spot at the Canes. The Wellingtonian will probably have the edge.

    TBF, a Magpies lock is going to struggle to even get a contract at the Canes, BBBR to the Highlanders I guess.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #241

    If you Chiefs boys want Hammer you'd better get a move on - before the ABs get their hands on him! 🙂

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #242

    @Chris-B said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    If you Chiefs boys want Hammer you'd better get a move on - before the ABs get their hands on him! 🙂

    Your jokes aren’t funny! 😡

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #243

    @Nepia said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @Chris-B said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    If you Chiefs boys want Hammer you'd better get a move on - before the ABs get their hands on him! 🙂

    Your jokes aren’t funny! 😡

    Agree he took it too far with that one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #244

    @No-Quarter said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    @booboo said in Crusaders v Chiefs:

    1. ALB
    2. Goodhue

    The thought gives me warm feels

    Fucking this. With the bulldozer from Wellington on the bench. Loving our midfield options right now.

    ALB 12 / Goodhue 13 has been my favoured combination since the test last year that ALB played or came on at 12 in and looked a million bucks. Their combination of skills gives me a chubby.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    4

Crusaders v Chiefs
Rugby Matches
crusaderschiefs
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.