Canes vs Chiefs
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="574367" data-time="1461403225">
<div>
<p>Guys Joubert clearly said you can't replace a player and cause golden oldies I.E. bullshit he's injured, you now have 14. That's my understanding.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Â </p>
<p>Was someone on the sideline telling Joubert wasnt it...is it a new ruling or an obscure one not often called?</p> -
<p>Apparently, this is the rule (as tweeted by Nigel Yalden):</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p>Law 3.5(k)</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg" alt="Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg"></p> -
<p>Woodward :(</p>
-
<p>If Beaudy's kicking didn't completely kill them, the brain farts by TJP did. I can't believe anyone in their right mind thinks he should be the second halfback option.</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="574379" data-time="1461403364">
<div>
<p>If Beaudy's kicking didn't completely kill them, the brain farts by TJP did. I can't believe anyone in their right mind thinks he should be the second halfback option.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I think it should still be TKB. He's less flashy than Weber or TJP, but he's reliable.</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p>I will be interested to see who gets the 3rd spot: TJP or Weber.</p> -
That's our 2nd 1 point loss this season. Grrr.
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Billy Tell" data-cid="574383" data-time="1461403457">
<div>
<p>I think it should still be TKB. He's less flashy than Weber or TJP, but he's reliable.</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p>I will be interested to see who gets the 3rd spot: TJP or Weber.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>DWTA. Weber on a bad day, and today was a bad day, is better than TKB on <strong>current form</strong>.</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p>But close call granted as both didn't look the goods. My opinion only,</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="574377" data-time="1461403316">
<div>
<p>Apparently, this is the rule (as tweeted by Nigel Yalden):</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p>Law 3.5(k)</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg" alt="Cgt3jyTUoAAaxmS.jpg"></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Â </p>
<p>I am not sure where I stand on the rule. It wasn't the chiefs fault they had two blokes injured. Unless we are punishing them for not having more props on the bench who can play both sides.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Toddy" data-cid="574384" data-time="1461403559">
<div>
<p>Good away win for the chiefs. When do they play the crusaders?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Beat them in Christchurch in Week 1 and them have that game up in Fiji in July I think.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hurricane" data-cid="574391" data-time="1461404173">
<div>
<p>I am not sure where I stand on the rule. It wasn't the chiefs fault they had two blokes injured. Unless we are punishing them for not having more props on the bench who can play both sides.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Â </p>
<p>That's the thing, though. I'm pretty sure Fisihoii has played both sides before.</p>
<p>South Africa have not put a prop on before when they had a player who was selected as a tighthead but played half the SupeRugby season at loosehead.</p> -
<p>In ITM Cup last year Northland took golden oldies option despite having a hooker on the bench who has played TH for us when our TH went down injured...the fact that naki were destroying our scrum had nothing to do with it, nothing at all! </p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="574395" data-time="1461404572"><p>In ITM Cup last year Northland took golden oldies option despite having a hooker on the bench who has played TH for us when our TH went down injured...the fact that naki were destroying our scrum had nothing to do with it, nothing at all!<br></p></blockquote>
<br>
Ahh, a new law created... because Taniwha.
