• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Rugby World Cup general discussion

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
rwc
1.2k Posts 82 Posters 97.9k Views
Rugby World Cup general discussion
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #1154

    People ignore the minnows a bit but from memory the Georgian 15 was pretty good or was it Portugal? Ramos and Keenan are very good. Keenan’s kicking would have been mighty handy at times.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1155

    @mariner4life yeah I do think for whatever reason, Fozzie had a plan, and it was centered on the RWC, but wonder if some of the changes were made too late for them to bed in as instinct when under pressure.

    Too often under Fozzies reign we have panicked when the heat came on, and this happened on the weekend.

    This year has been a mixed bag of performances from us, and there have been subtle improvements, but not enough time for whatbthey were trying to achieve to bed in.

    But then you wonder how much impact Schmidt and Ryan have had on things too.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #1156

    @Billy-Tell said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    BB has made every team of the tournament I have seen but never found universal favour on this forum.

    He's better than he's been rated on here. I think it's mix of comparing him to his previous highs, him being blamed for obvious team tactics and a few posters seem to really dislike him

    Like RM he had too many error's offsetting the good stuff in the final. Thought he played well in QF & SF.
    Somewhere between OK and goodish for the tournament. Not worthy of the negativity or a place in the team of the tournament

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1157

    @taniwharugby said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    @mariner4life yeah I do think for whatever reason, Fozzie had a plan, and it was centered on the RWC, but wonder if some of the changes were made too late for them to bed in as instinct when under pressure.

    Too often under Fozzies reign we have panicked when the heat came on, and this happened on the weekend.

    This year has been a mixed bag of performances from us, and there have been subtle improvements, but not enough time for whatbthey were trying to achieve to bed in.

    But then you wonder how much impact Schmidt and Ryan have had on things too.

    We never really settled on a consistent playing style. I don't know why that is but as HC Foster should have set that

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Dodge on last edited by
    #1158

    @Dodge said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    Well this is a perfect fucking summary of what happened in this tournament. Flats is a top journalist / pundit. I hated thinking he was right the first time I saw this, I wanted France or Ireland to go all the way (I never thought we had a chance), but fuck me the simplicity of this message is perfect

    @mariner4life

    It’s funny though eh?

    I also picked SA to win the whole thing a couple of months ago. For all the same reasons, knockout rugby, kick goals from 60m, solid defense blah blah blah

    And yet, we were a solitary point off them in a game where absolutely nothing went right for us. We dropped ball stone cold (Jordan, ALB, Richie), threw a bunch of sloppy passes, inexplicably stopped contesting line outs, had a try disallowed, got the short-end of the stick from the officials (most believe) but either way had to play with 14 for 60mins, and we missed 2 kicks to give us a lead that we could potentially have defended

    It kind of raises 2 questions/observations.

    1. Were SA actually as good as we are all making out?

    And

    1. Ireland must have watched that performance from both SA and NZ thought “what if”
    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Dodge on last edited by nostrildamus
    #1159

    @Dodge said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    Well this is a perfect fucking summary of what happened in this tournament. Flats is a top journalist / pundit. I hated thinking he was right the first time I saw this, I wanted France or Ireland to go all the way (I never thought we had a chance), but fuck me the simplicity of this message is perfect

    Maybe, but I loved the twitter replies

    1 guy who has never been afraid to speak against the noise. He openly said in January already that Sputh Africa has such a dangerously good talent pipeline, if we retain Rassie then we will dominate for years.
    Only IRB changing rules to rugby league will stop our dominance

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by nostrildamus
    #1160

    Um if SA coaches were so brilliant tactically, shouldn't they have picked Pollard at the start? (Yeah, yeah, Rassie points to trophies on the wall as answer)...

    Billy WebbB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #1161

    @voodoo we're better than some want to admit

    Ireland have no idea what the pressure of a RWC final does. They had their shot and we beat them

    The final rammed home that there is absolutely nothing between the top 4 sides,

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    13
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1162

    @mariner4life said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    @voodoo we're better than some want to admit

    Ireland have no idea what the pressure of a RWC final does. They had their shot and we beat them

    The final rammed home that there is absolutely nothing between the top 4 sides,

    I'm increasingly convinced that our tactics on the day were a significant contributor to us not winning. If Razor can fix that, we will be dangerous

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Dodge on last edited by
    #1163

    @Dodge said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    Well this is a perfect fucking summary of what happened in this tournament. Flats is a top journalist / pundit. I hated thinking he was right the first time I saw this, I wanted France or Ireland to go all the way (I never thought we had a chance), but fuck me the simplicity of this message is perfect

    Hopefully by the next RWC cycle Pougach will be fucking put out to pasture and Flats will be running the show

    He's brilliant

    And funny as fuck too

    If you have a chance to see him live, do it

    TeWaioT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #1164

    @nostrildamus said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    Um if SA coaches were so brilliant tactically, shouldn't they have picked Pollard at the start? (Yeah, yeah, Rassie points to trophies on the wall as answer)...

    Pollard wasn't originally picked in the squad because at the time of selection he was out injured and had been for some time. And the Boks have a policy* of not picking injured players 😉

    Same went for Am and Lood de Jager.
    They were though all placed on the standby list.

    You could argue Kolisi was the exception. But by some miracle, he came back from knee surgery and was able to play a bit just before squad selection.

    *Note: the actual policy I know of is that if you are not fit enough to train on the Monday, you don't get picked for the weekend.
    Cases in point would be Vincent Koch not making it to this final, and in the 2019 edition, Cheslin Kolbe not playing in the Semi-final.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1165

    @Machpants said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    We've had 9 10 world cups, but only 8 captains, has someone died? Nope, it's just the 2 x 🐐 double Captain power!

    Freshened up your post for you.
    Nice thing is that photo will last until 2027 too.

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Billy Webb on last edited by
    #1166

    @Billy-Webb said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    @Machpants said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    We've had 9 10 world cups, but only 8 captains, has someone died? Nope, it's just the 2 x 🐐 double Captain power!

    Freshened up your post for you.
    Nice thing is that photo will last until 2027 too.

    How thoughtful and generous of you! Try not to dwell on the new potential horror that Tom Foley the TMO can call back a play no matter how many phases (days ago) it was!

    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #1167

    FB_IMG_1699280754110.jpg

    CatograndeC NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by Smuts
    #1168

    @nostrildamus said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    @Billy-Webb said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    @Machpants said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    We've had 9 10 world cups, but only 8 captains, has someone died? Nope, it's just the 2 x 🐐 double Captain power!

    Freshened up your post for you.
    Nice thing is that photo will last until 2027 too.

    How thoughtful and generous of you! Try not to dwell on the new potential horror that Tom Foley the TMO can call back a play no matter how many phases (days ago) it was!

    TMO’s are a blight on the game.

    Imagine having that power and not going back to penalize the 97 Lions’ scrum right off Newlands in the first test and award both Russell Bennett’s tries that were wrongly called back for forward passes.

    Sort Bill Youngs out while you’re at it. Cowards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1169

    @Bones

    It would be good to see stats for the number of shit kicks per game. Pretty sure England would top that list too 😟

    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #1170

    @Catogrande said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    @Bones

    It would be good to see stats for the number of shit kicks per game. Pretty sure England would top that list too 😟

    On an absolute basis, maybe.

    But plenty of supposedly attacking teams put up a huge number of ale-house balls. back & midBarrett, Mounga and Jordan all hoofed and hoped with overlaps in the final.

    And Kriel’s worst play of the RWC was his shocking effort after Kwagga’s turnover.

    I was many beers in but I also vaguely recall one of the Irish players putting up a nothing kick right at the death when he had space to exploit. You could almost see his gears stripping as he tried and failed to come up with anything better to do. Pressure’s a bastard.

    It’s a long while ago now but Scotland probably were the worst wasters of good attacking ball with low percentage kicks.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #1171

    @Smuts Some stand outs there for sure but when we're talking sheer weight of numbers...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #1172

    @Bones said in Rugby World Cup general discussion:

    FB_IMG_1699280754110.jpg

    I think a better stat would be "kicks per minute of possession".

    After all, if your opposition isn't going to kick it back to you, or there are a lot of stoppages, you're unlikely to have the same opportunity to kick.

    I saw this stat before the Semifinal and it was quite low for the Boks BUT also need to keep in mind that, in their pools:

    1. Running over Romania meant less kicking and much more dead time due to tries and conversions.
    2. Smashing Tonga (17 kicks per game mind) meant less kicking
    3. Ireland and Scotland played high-possession rugby, so the Boks have less time or inclination to kick.

    Context.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #1173

    @NTA

    All good points but you’re not denying us our moment of glory. We are top of the table. It’s a matter of record.

    1 Reply Last reply
    8

Rugby World Cup general discussion
Sports Talk
rwc
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.