Bledisloe I (All Blacks team room bugged)
-
<p>No Paddy Tuipolotou...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Otherwise seems the A team as far as possible. Don't mind seeing Squire get a shot.</p> -
ALL BLACKS: Israel Dagg, Ben Smith, Malakai Fekitoa, Ryan Crotty, Waisake Naholo, Beauden Barrett, Aaron Smith, Kieran Read (c), Sam Cane, Jerome Kaino, Sam Whitelock, Brodie Retallick, Owen Franks, Nathan Harris, Wyatt Crockett. Reserves: Codie Taylor, Kane Hames, Charlie Faumuina, Liam Squire, Ardie Savea, TJ Perenara, Aaron Cruden, Julian Savea.<br><br>
Happy to see Beaudan starting but I can't say I am that thrilled with the bench. Still some unknown element with Hames and Squire, Cruden does not seem like a great impact player, TJ seems to struggle when he comes on off the bench but the worst is Savea J. I see absolutely no point in having him off the bench or him being in the 23 man squad when he is so off form. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="DMX" data-cid="606125" data-time="1471454208">
<div>
<p>Cruden does not seem like a great impact player</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Judging by Hansen's comments, they will play Barrett for the full 80 minutes if he lasts the whole game vs. bringing on Cruden for impact. </p> -
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.allblacks.com/News/29601/all-blacks-team-named-for-bledisloe-cup-opener'>Team named</a>:</p>
<p> </p>
<p></p><blockquote class="ipsBlockquote"><br><p>1. Wyatt Crockett (48)<br>
2. Nathan Harris (4)<br>
3. Owen Franks (80)<br>
4. Brodie Retallick (50)<br>
5. Samuel Whitelock (75)<br>
6. Jerome Kaino (69)<br>
7. Sam Cane (34)<br>
8. Kieran Read – captain (87)<br>
9. Aaron Smith (50)<br>
10. Beauden Barrett (39)<br>
11. Waisake Naholo (6)<br>
12. Ryan Crotty (18)<br>
13. Malakai Fekitoa (15)<br>
14. Ben Smith (51)<br>
15. Israel Dagg (51)<br><br>
16. Codie Taylor (5)<br>
17. Kane Hames<br>
18. Charlie Faumuina (36)<br>
19. Liam Squire (1)<br>
20. Ardie Savea (2)<br>
21. TJ Perenara (19)<br>
22. Aaron Cruden (39)<br>
23. Julian Savea (43)</p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Strange bench compared to those in the past few seasons, but largely predictable side. Well done Kane Hames.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crucial" data-cid="606129" data-time="1471456754">
<div>
<p>I'm guessing Bender is covering the midfield?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Going by the third match against Wales, Naholo can cover the midfield as well.</p> -
<p>J Savea on the bench who has only ever played 11 and is in not so great form , interesting </p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="JayCee" data-cid="606126" data-time="1471454705">
<div>
<p>Judging by Hansen's comments, they will play Barrett for the full 80 minutes if he lasts the whole game vs. bringing on Cruden for impact. </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Im guessing with no injuries , we might see Barrett to FB , Savea in a straight swap with Naholo </p> -
So did Coles aggravate his injury in the final or was it always a stretch for him to start this week?
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="DMX" data-cid="606125" data-time="1471454208">
<div>
<p>Cruden does not seem like a great impact player, TJ seems to struggle when he comes on off the bench but the worst is Savea J. I see absolutely no point in having him off the bench or him being in the 23 man squad when he is so off form.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Tend to disagree with the above. There's no reason Cruden can't be an awesome impact player. Admittedly he can only play first five... but after most of a game observing and looking for holes to exploit, he could be fantastic with his running at the line and bringing the backline in. It's not like Sopoaga towers over him as an impact player anyway.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You have to reward that form TJP has shown leading his team to a Super Rugby title and give him the opportunity to show he has matured as a player... something he's earned by showing that at a Super Rugby level at least.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As for Savea, well, I guess they either leave him for the NPC on or give him opportunities off the bench. They've chosen to try and play him into form. I don't actually think they have any more back cover in the squad anyway, do they?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Milk" data-cid="606142" data-time="1471460601">
<div>
<p>As for Savea, well, I guess they either leave him for the NPC on or give him opportunities off the bench. They've chosen to try and play him into form. I don't actually think they have any more back cover in the squad anyway, do they?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>ALB and Sopaga would be the only other options in the squad.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I get the selection though, I disagree with those who say Savea is out of form and shouldn't be picked. His form on the bench during the final was undeniable; incredible posture for the full 70 minutes before being getting on the field, he clapped at all the right times and provided excellent head rubs and pats on the back to players being subbed off. It's a 23 man game these days and I didn't see anyone else doing the kind of work Jules did on the pine (in a big match environment too).</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="606131" data-time="1471457487">
<div>
<p>Going by the third match against Wales, Naholo <strong>can</strong> cover the midfield as well.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Naholo was terrible when he went into the midfield in that test. Having J Savea on the bench really limits your options as it's easier to manufacture a winger than put someone into the midfield. B Smith is the only option.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm surprised that Squire gets picked ahead of Pat T. I expect both locks to play the full 80. </p> -
<p>Congratulations to Kane Hames who is one of those guys who impressed every time he plays. The first cap of many from him, I suspect. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Decent looking starting line up and lots of potential impact of the bench, especially the Savea boys. Only risk would be if we lose a lock or a midfield player in the first half hour.</p> -
<p>So starting by super rugby team</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Crusaders 6</p>
<p>H/Landers 4</p>
<p>Cheifs 3</p>
<p>Blues Canes 1 each</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You would think the Canes were the worst team based of these numbers. And the Crusaders easily the best</p>
<p> </p>
<p>(I wonder where the head coach hails from)</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Winger" data-cid="606164" data-time="1471466629">
<div>
<p>So starting by super rugby team</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Crusaders 6</p>
<p>H/Landers 4</p>
<p>Cheifs 3</p>
<p>Blues Canes 1 each</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You would think the Canes were the worst team based of these numbers. And the Crusaders easily the best</p>
<p> </p>
<p>(I wonder where the head coach hails from)</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>He hails from NZ.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Winger" data-cid="606164" data-time="1471466629">
<div>
<p>So starting by super rugby team</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Crusaders 6</p>
<p>H/Landers 4</p>
<p>Cheifs 3</p>
<p>Blues Canes 1 each</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You would think the Canes were the worst team based of these numbers. And the Crusaders easily the best</p>
<p> </p>
<p>(I wonder where the head coach hails from)</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>am sure I have heard this story before....</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I wonder if we should change the team every year based on the Super rugby results, those rookies Dagg, Whitelock, Read, Franks and Crockett all there because of the coaches bias towards the Crusaders and should be dropped for their Hurricane opposites.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crucial" data-cid="606130" data-time="1471456798">
<div>
<p>Hey, I saw the team early. It's only Wednesday evening!</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Hooroo" data-cid="606156" data-time="1471464861">
<div>
<p>Can't beleive Ardie Savea didn't get the gig at 7.................................................</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>The silverfern, where jokes never get old apparently :idiot2:</p>
