• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks vs England 2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksengland
1.7k Posts 91 Posters 44.0k Views
All Blacks vs England 2
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lancaster Park
    wrote on last edited by
    #1618

    Lineout was a worry but we have had two of the worlds best leave/retire.
    Barrett has always been good (not quite at Whitelock or BBBR level but capable for a shorter lock) but Ive never thought of Patty as a really good lineout guy. We,ve basically got two short locks and a reasonably tall six.

    However our shortage of locks means we cant play a lock at 6 and our issues at 6 means lineout is not the primary skillset we need from a 6. (especially with a short-ish 8).

    Do we sacrifice a power defence six for a better lineout six? Swap Finau for say Grace who is a good lineout operator?

    R MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to Lancaster Park on last edited by
    #1619

    @Lancaster-Park Finau's not bad in the lineout, we just chose to throw it to... Savea...?
    Hoskins is a good lineout forward, though mentioning him is likely to get the Blues guys all frothy again.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Lancaster Park on last edited by
    #1620

    @Lancaster-Park said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    Lineout was a worry but we have had two of the worlds best leave/retire.
    Barrett has always been good (not quite at Whitelock or BBBR level but capable for a shorter lock) but Ive never thought of Patty as a really good lineout guy. We,ve basically got two short locks and a reasonably tall six.

    However our shortage of locks means we cant play a lock at 6 and our issues at 6 means lineout is not the primary skillset we need from a 6. (especially with a short-ish 8).

    Do we sacrifice a power defence six for a better lineout six? Swap Finau for say Grace who is a good lineout operator?

    Settle down

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #1621

    @Winger said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    @kev said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    @Bones yep I agree - coaches need to work on him, not replace him. He is a natural runner so his first instinct is to get up to speed and then look. Better to know the space is there and pass on instinct. Good thing was they created more room in the 2nd test.

    The lineout was a mess but confident they will sort it - everything including once they had the ball.

    How much longer does Reiko need. Before the coaches accept the obvious. Hes not a center.

    i dont think that fair, he has been arguably one of the best centres in the world in the past...hes just a particular type of centre and the coaches either need to

    1. drop him if how he plays doesnt fit with their game plan
    2. coach him to do what they need
    3. come up with a gameplan that lets him shine

    just trying to play a certain way and then saying its not working....over and over...is not an option

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #1622

    I'm no Rieko fluffer, but Beauden is getting sucked off by all and sundry and he blew 2 far more obvious overlaps than Rieko on the weekend.
    When we have a night like that in the lineout and people are talking about our centre, that's just fucken weird.

    WingerW 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #1623

    @reprobate said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    @Lancaster-Park Finau's not bad in the lineout, we just chose to throw it to... Savea...?
    Hoskins is a good lineout forward, though mentioning him is likely to get the Blues guys all frothy again.

    Our best lineout of the night was Finau over the back.

    The AB lineout for years was helped by A Smith's pass. We could win it anywhere and still have good wide attacking ball. So lots of 2 and 4.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #1624

    Finau was a strong lineout option in SR. It makes literally no sense replacing him in the hope our lineout isn't the shambles it was against England.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #1625

    The first thing to fix is having faster distribution from the base i.e, Ratima starts and Christie goes back to passing school.
    It essential we speed up our game because that is our natural advantage. We have the most instinctively attacking players in the world.

    WingerW 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #1626

    @reprobate said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    lineout and people are talking about our centre, that's just fucken weird.

    No its not. We are allowed to post about more than one thing. Even if it upsets some.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Frank on last edited by Winger
    #1627

    @Frank said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    The first thing to fix is having faster distribution from the base i.e, Ratima starts and Christie goes back to passing school.
    It essential we speed up our game because that is our natural advantage. We have the most instinctively attacking players in the world.

    Agree. And the HB change is the key starting point. But having 2 limited passers in midfield is also an issue.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #1628

    @Winger said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    @reprobate said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    lineout and people are talking about our centre, that's just fucken weird.

    No its not. We are allowed to post about more than one thing. Even if it upsets some.

    Why do you think calling it weird is some sort of attack on free speech, when in fact not being allowed to call it weird would be that. It's fucken weird.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1629

    If there was a decent Hurricanes lineout forward he would be talking about it more

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #1630

    There were a few things happening with the lineout (other than the couple of complete shockers by Taylor where the throw barely went past head height or past 2) that I’d normally look past because with Whitelock and Retallick we had bail out options even against teams that like to attack opposition ball (like England). But we don’t have those now so we need to get it pinpoint and not muck around with the shuffling, calls and lifting.

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #1631

    @ACT-Crusader I fucking despiiiiise that two formation lineout where they go to a usual formation, compress, and then expand again. I firmly believe your put yourselves under unnecessary pressure.
    Identify the mismatch, call, quick feet and lift. Lineouts are basic.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCorner
    wrote on last edited by
    #1632

    On the bright side a lineout is easier to fix than a scrum. We have a scrum

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to BerniesCorner on last edited by
    #1633

    @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    On the bright side a lineout is easier to fix than a scrum. We have a scrum

    But very often a shit line out can be a momentum killer

    See D Lake for Wales

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #1634

    @MiketheSnow said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks vs England 2:

    On the bright side a lineout is easier to fix than a scrum. We have a scrum

    But very often a shit line out can be a momentum killer

    See D Lake for Wales

    I would rather have a ropey scrum than a fucked lineout.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCornerB Offline
    BerniesCorner
    wrote on last edited by
    #1635

    A ropey scrum is a penalty magnet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DaGrubster
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1636

    @mariner4life

    I would rather both were functioning competently.

    The lineout completely killed any momentum we had in the 1st half and were the main reason for us going in behind at halftime.

    Lineouts are best when simple, quick and varied.

    It’s not as if the English lineout is incredibly tall.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #1637

    Most games now have more lineouts than scrums.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks vs England 2
Rugby Matches
allblacksengland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.