• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NZ First Five Crisis

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
139 Posts 51 Posters 4.2k Views
NZ First Five Crisis
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #33

    @Nepia said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @dogmeat said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    There were only 13 tests between Fox and Mehrts - but it seemed like an eternity.

    Do people think Fox would get a look in today? I doubt he'd make Super Rugby TBH. Doesn't fit NZ DNA and therein lies the problem. Doing the fundamentals right 99% of the time and playing the percentages doesn't jiggle NZ rugby's ovaries nowadays.

    The Fox coming up through the NZ system today would be a markedly different beast, he'd still have all the control, but he'd have more muscle/size and the running game he had as a youngster wouldn't be as easily dispensed with.

    I think talent is talent, and Fox had it, he was a symptom of his era.

    Fox might be quite similar to Plummer....

    I think it's all DCs fault. He was such a gifted attacking weapon that everyone wants to find the next version. But they forget he was fundamentally sound in a way that BB, RM and DM are not. Along with all the other kids coming up

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Away
    S Away
    SouthernMann
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    Every few years a position pops up of concern. Last year we were worrying about halfback when Smith went. Now we are rolling into a period where we will half nearly half a dozen guys fighting for a spot. Lock is looking equally as competitive. As 10 is a critical position, there is some concern. We don't have a DC and as he was a generational player, we are unlikely to see another of that calibre. We just need to ensure the guys who do bring in can fit into the line up and style we want to use.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #35

    @gt12 I'd say Jordie has a big kick and they are not utilizing it.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #36

    @dogmeat said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    Doing the fundamentals right 99% of the time and playing the percentages doesn't jiggle NZ rugby's ovaries nowadays.

    And that's why we don't win as many Tests anymore. Rugby is about doing the fundamentals right 99% of the time much more than it is about 3 second miracle plays that go viral on TicTok.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to sparky on last edited by canefan
    #37

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @dogmeat said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    Doing the fundamentals right 99% of the time and playing the percentages doesn't jiggle NZ rugby's ovaries nowadays.

    And that's why we don't win as many Tests anymore. Rugby is about doing the fundamentals right 99% of the time much more than it is about 3 second miracle plays that go viral on TicTok.

    We used to pick Fox over Botica, Merhts over Spencer. Because the best AB 10s were outstanding game managers, with accurate kicking games "off the tee" and in general play. DC was the Unicorn. And now I agree the pendulum has swung too far the other way. And that is why I want to at least see a throwback like Plummer have a go. Nothing wrong with a guy who is very good at kicking goals and kicking for territory, who is happy to pass the ball to his outsides most of the time but isn't afraid to have a dig every once in a while

    R sparkyS 2 Replies Last reply
    5
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to SouthernMann on last edited by
    #38

    @SouthernMann said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    Every few years a position pops up of concern. Last year we were worrying about halfback when Smith went. Now we are rolling into a period where we will half nearly half a dozen guys fighting for a spot. Lock is looking equally as competitive. As 10 is a critical position, there is some concern. We don't have a DC and as he was a generational player, we are unlikely to see another of that calibre. We just need to ensure the guys who do bring in can fit into the line up and style we want to use.

    I think this is a very over optimistic post

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #39

    @canefan said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @sparky said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @dogmeat said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    Doing the fundamentals right 99% of the time and playing the percentages doesn't jiggle NZ rugby's ovaries nowadays.

    And that's why we don't win as many Tests anymore. Rugby is about doing the fundamentals right 99% of the time much more than it is about 3 second miracle plays that go viral on TicTok.

    We used to pick Fox over Botica, Merhts over Spencer. Because the best AB 10s were outstanding game managers, with accurate kicking games "off the tee" and in general play. DC was the Unicorn. And now I agree the pendulum has swung too far the other way. And that is why I want to at least see a throwback like Plummer have a go. Nothing wrong with a guy who is very good at kicking goals and kicking for territory, who is happy to pass the ball to his outsides most of the time but isn't afraid to have a dig every once in a while

    I don't mind our argument, but Plummer kicked significantly worse then McKenzie in Super.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #40

    @canefan said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @gt12 I'd say Jordie has a big kick and they are not utilizing it.

    Probably because it's an area weapon. Some precision would be nice.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DaGrubster
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #41

    @Canes4life said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @ARHS said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    Cameron

    Too an extent, when the pressure comes on he's hopeless.

    A ringing endorsement

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    chucknz
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #42

    @nzzp yet dmac doesn't have a better test or super record, why have different criteria?

    Do you answer your own question with Razor and Mounga, they won more than any combo of 10 and coach, so either Foster couldn't get best out of Mounga or Dmac can't work with Razor

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to chucknz on last edited by
    #43

    @chucknz said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp yet dmac doesn't have a better test or super record, why have different criteria?

    Do you answer your own question with Razor and Mounga, they won more than any combo of 10 and coach, so either Foster couldn't get best out of Mounga or Dmac can't work with Razor

    or, Test and Super ain't remotely the same sport any more.

    I was very careful to say DMac will finish a better player. Wait 4 years and let's see. And quality may not just be on wins - RM got a rolls royce ride with that forward pack in Super. He was a cheat code at times, but it doesn't transfer to Tests.

    Let's wait and see.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • D Online
    D Online
    darylmitchell
    replied to nzzp on last edited by darylmitchell
    #44

    @nzzp said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @chucknz said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @nzzp yet dmac doesn't have a better test or super record, why have different criteria?

    Do you answer your own question with Razor and Mounga, they won more than any combo of 10 and coach, so either Foster couldn't get best out of Mounga or Dmac can't work with Razor

    or, Test and Super ain't remotely the same sport any more.

    I was very careful to say DMac will finish a better player. Wait 4 years and let's see. And quality may not just be on wins - RM got a rolls royce ride with that forward pack in Super. He was a cheat code at times, but it doesn't transfer to Tests.

    Let's wait and see.

    I don't agree he always got an armchair ride with his forward pack, the Chiefs pack was definitely stronger in 2023, it was more that with his insane vision and footwork he could literally dance around the weaker Super Rugby defenses but less weaknesses found in the top-tier international defenses and margins of error to exploit.

    nzzpN R 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to darylmitchell on last edited by
    #45

    @darylmitchell fair.

    But any forward pack with Sam W in it ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    replied to darylmitchell on last edited by
    #46

    @darylmitchell footwork yes, vision not so much.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #47

    @reprobate said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    @darylmitchell footwork yes, vision not so much.

    Heads up vision for his running game was outstanding and passing vision was good.
    Let down by his ability with the boot at times.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #48

    I know it wasn't always the way, but DC often had the luxury of the weapon Nonu became outside him, while DC was in a league of his own, it meant Nonu was also a threat, so gave DC that extra split second of time.

    Our recent 10s havent had the luxury of a Nonu or even SBW running outside them.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    wrote on last edited by brodean
    #49

    The main problem Dmac has at the ABs is weak phase play from the forwards. His contestable bomb is also too telegraphed.

    JB had been very up and down on attack this year and had lacked chemistry with 10 and 13.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #50

    @taniwharugby said in NZ First Five Crisis:

    I know it wasn't always the way, but DC often had the luxury of the weapon Nonu became outside him, while DC was in a league of his own, it meant Nonu was also a threat, so gave DC that extra split second of time.

    Our recent 10s havent had the luxury of a Nonu or even SBW running outside them.

    The 2024 ABs are a homeless man's 2015 ABs

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #51

    @antipodean did anyone else notice the Black Ferns got more distance on their kicks to touch from penalties than Jordie did when playing against the Boks?

    I know the Boks have wingers that mean you need to clear the side line, but Jordie was giving up 25m or so from what I would expect from him. Lineouts from penalties were taking place before or on the 22m line, whereas they should have been closer to the 5m line to really put pressure on the try line.

    If you have the chance to kick deep into opposition territory, you need to take it. On this, it reminded me of rugby league touch finders.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Jordies line kicking is sloppy at times.

    James Lowe seems to nail it every time.

    Guys like Stevenson and Sullivan have better exit kicks generally.

    Roigards exits were a weapon but I'm not sure the box kick as is easy now days with that new rule.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

NZ First Five Crisis
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.