• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Movie review thread...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
19.6k Posts 162 Posters 3.2m Views
Movie review thread...
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rembrandt
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #19491

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Looks good, will hopefully keep me entertained until 28 months later gets released

    Looks great, I'm a sucker for good zombie flick/tv/books/games. So many start good but go off into cheesy, or unbelievable territory like giving zombies intelligence. 28 Days later one of the best, wasn't as enamoured with 28weeks later. First season of Walking Dead was probably the best Zombie adaptation I've ever seen.

    Currently playing an open world zombie apocalypse survival game in VR, utterly terrifying.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Rembrandt on last edited by
    #19492

    @Rembrandt said in Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Looks good, will hopefully keep me entertained until 28 months later gets released

    Looks great, I'm a sucker for good zombie flick/tv/books/games. So many start good but go off into cheesy, or unbelievable territory like giving zombies intelligence. 28 Days later one of the best, wasn't as enamoured with 28weeks later. First season of Walking Dead was probably the best Zombie adaptation I've ever seen.

    Currently playing an open world zombie apocalypse survival game in VR, utterly terrifying.

    A post after my own heart.

    What I shared literally looks like someone copied the notes of 28 days/weeks/The Walking Dead and didn't even change their name at the bottom. Is there anything new they can bring to the table I wonder ?

    ( Apart from being filmed in NZ masquerading as the US by the looks of things )

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #19493

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Looks good, will hopefully keep me entertained until 28 months later gets released

    Looks basic - but that's my scene.
    Was also an excellent primer for a rabbit-hole of youtube recommendations. Stand Your Ground also looks like a Kruse-level dumb-as-fuck thing-to-watch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #19494

    Warfare (2025) ⭐ 7.3 | Action, Drama, War

    Warfare (2025) ⭐ 7.3 | Action, Drama, War

    1h 35m | R

    Raw fare

    4 exits out of 5 exit wounds

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #19495

    Havoc - Tom Hardy, Timothy Oliphant, Forest Whitaker

    Pretty decent, lots of John Wick.level killing

    3 massacred gangs out of 5 corrupt cops

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #19496

    Saving Private Ryan

    After a few years break I decided to watch it again on Anzac Day.

    Still amazing. Still hits hard. Still SO amazingly made.

    That bit where the allies disembark on the shore and get mowed down by machine gun fire is still shockingly in your face. Repeating what I’ve already said on here in the past but I watched it with my Granddad before he passed on VHS and he was in awe ( and slightly traumatised again ) by the realism of everything being a war vet as most of our Granddads were.

    Captain Miller and his squad are a bunch of guys you genuinely like and relate to.

    Tom Hanks never better. Of the supporting cast Edward Burns, Tom Sizemore and Adam Goldberg were standouts. Vin Diesel impressed in his smaller role too. Even Matt Damon was good !

    The whole premise is maybe slightly cheesy but doesn't really detract from an incredible movie experience.

    5 sticky bombs out of 5 FUBAR missions

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #19497

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Saving Private Ryan

    After a few years break I decided to watch it again on Anzac Day.

    Still amazing. Still hits hard. Still SO amazingly made.

    That bit where the allies disembark on the shore and get mowed down by machine gun fire is still shockingly realistic.

    Captain Miller and his squad are a bunch of guys you genuinely like and relate to.

    Tom Hanks never better. Of the supporting cast Edward Burns, Tom Sizemore and Adam Goldberg were standouts. Vin Diesel impressed in his smaller role too. Even Matt Damon was good !

    The whole premise is maybe slightly cheesy but doesn't really detract from an incredible movie experience.

    5 sticky bombs out of 5 FUBAR missions

    Little fun fact, at the time Tom Sizemore was notorious for his drug use so he was made to take a drugs test every day of shooting.
    Spielberg told him if he failed a single drugs test he would be fired from the film and they would reshoot everything he had previously shot with a new actor.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #19498

    @Virgil said in Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Saving Private Ryan

    After a few years break I decided to watch it again on Anzac Day.

    Still amazing. Still hits hard. Still SO amazingly made.

    That bit where the allies disembark on the shore and get mowed down by machine gun fire is still shockingly realistic.

    Captain Miller and his squad are a bunch of guys you genuinely like and relate to.

    Tom Hanks never better. Of the supporting cast Edward Burns, Tom Sizemore and Adam Goldberg were standouts. Vin Diesel impressed in his smaller role too. Even Matt Damon was good !

    The whole premise is maybe slightly cheesy but doesn't really detract from an incredible movie experience.

    5 sticky bombs out of 5 FUBAR missions

    Little fun fact, at the time Tom Sizemore was notorious for his drug use so he was made to take a drugs test every day of shooting.
    Spielberg told him if he failed a single drugs test he would be fired from the film and they would reshoot everything he had previously shot with a new actor.

    Michael Madsen woulda been a good like for like replacement

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #19499

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    @Virgil said in Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Saving Private Ryan

    After a few years break I decided to watch it again on Anzac Day.

    Still amazing. Still hits hard. Still SO amazingly made.

    That bit where the allies disembark on the shore and get mowed down by machine gun fire is still shockingly realistic.

    Captain Miller and his squad are a bunch of guys you genuinely like and relate to.

    Tom Hanks never better. Of the supporting cast Edward Burns, Tom Sizemore and Adam Goldberg were standouts. Vin Diesel impressed in his smaller role too. Even Matt Damon was good !

    The whole premise is maybe slightly cheesy but doesn't really detract from an incredible movie experience.

    5 sticky bombs out of 5 FUBAR missions

    Little fun fact, at the time Tom Sizemore was notorious for his drug use so he was made to take a drugs test every day of shooting.
    Spielberg told him if he failed a single drugs test he would be fired from the film and they would reshoot everything he had previously shot with a new actor.

    Michael Madsen woulda been a good like for like replacement

    Yeeeah he’s much more reliable

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #19500

    @Virgil said in Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    @Virgil said in Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Saving Private Ryan

    After a few years break I decided to watch it again on Anzac Day.

    Still amazing. Still hits hard. Still SO amazingly made.

    That bit where the allies disembark on the shore and get mowed down by machine gun fire is still shockingly realistic.

    Captain Miller and his squad are a bunch of guys you genuinely like and relate to.

    Tom Hanks never better. Of the supporting cast Edward Burns, Tom Sizemore and Adam Goldberg were standouts. Vin Diesel impressed in his smaller role too. Even Matt Damon was good !

    The whole premise is maybe slightly cheesy but doesn't really detract from an incredible movie experience.

    5 sticky bombs out of 5 FUBAR missions

    Little fun fact, at the time Tom Sizemore was notorious for his drug use so he was made to take a drugs test every day of shooting.
    Spielberg told him if he failed a single drugs test he would be fired from the film and they would reshoot everything he had previously shot with a new actor.

    Michael Madsen woulda been a good like for like replacement

    Yeeeah he’s much more reliable

    Tarantino woulda probably fired him if he sobered up too much

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    wrote on last edited by Kruse
    #19501

    Got myself a little unreliable in the decision-making stakes - took a toke, decided I'd watch Hitman: Agent 47 while stoned.
    Within a minute - got paranoid - pretty sure I'd already watched this recently.
    Pivoted - now watching The Great Texas Dynamite Chase...
    ... updates to follow... maybe...
    5 minutes in - tit-watch: all over the place; there's been tumbleweed; and a bank with confederate-battle-flag on the wall

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #19502

    @MiketheSnow said in Movie review thread...:

    Warfare (2025) ⭐ 7.3 | Action, Drama, War

    Warfare (2025) ⭐ 7.3 | Action, Drama, War

    1h 35m | R

    Raw fare

    4 exits out of 5 exit wounds

    There's a decent interview with the directors on the 18 April eposode of the Empire podcast.

    The whole thing was filmed in Bovington.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    wrote on last edited by Kruse
    #19503

    Caged Heat

    • going as expected for a while
    • nightmare scene, while stoned, kinda threw me for a bit
    • playacting scene wasn't particularly great for a stoned man neither
    • plot isn't making much sense, but I'm sure it will all come together
      -- 35min in, nothing much making sense, but that may well be a "me thing"
    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #19504

    @Kruse said in Movie review thread...:

    Caged Heat

    • going as expected for a while
    • nightmare scene, while stoned, kinda threw me for a bit
    • playacting scene wasn't particularly great for a stoned man neither
    • plot isn't making much sense, but I'm sure it will all come together
      -- 35min in, nothing much making sense, but that may well be a "me thing"

    The above makes me wonder if the fern needs some sort of sobriety test before posting.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CatograndeC Online
    CatograndeC Online
    Catogrande
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #19505

    @MN5 said in Movie review thread...:

    @Kruse said in Movie review thread...:

    Caged Heat

    • going as expected for a while
    • nightmare scene, while stoned, kinda threw me for a bit
    • playacting scene wasn't particularly great for a stoned man neither
    • plot isn't making much sense, but I'm sure it will all come together
      -- 35min in, nothing much making sense, but that may well be a "me thing"

    The above makes me wonder if the fern needs some sort of sobriety test before posting.

    It would certainly cull the membership

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #19506

    Revenge of the Sith

    Really fucking good. Great to see it on the big screen again. When you watch the first 2 and clone wars in prep the last 3rd is sad as fuck.

    Yes the dialogue at times is clunky (deadset how did George talk to his wife?) But the visuals are amazing, the music is incredible.

    I honestly believe it's better than Return of the Jedi

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by MN5
    #19507

    @mariner4life said in Movie review thread...:

    Revenge of the Sith

    Really fucking good. Great to see it on the big screen again. When you watch the first 2 and clone wars in prep the last 3rd is sad as fuck.

    Yes the dialogue at times is clunky (deadset how did George talk to his wife?) But the visuals are amazing, the music is incredible.

    I honestly believe it's better than Return of the Jedi

    Huge call, I won't entirely disagree.......perhaps the only thing against ROTS for me personally is that I didn't see it as a wide eyed kid at the Movies in Nelson with my Grandma ( who was probably wondering what the fuck she'd gotten herself in for ) like I did ROTJ.

    Wrong thread but I'll post my rankings anyway......

    1 Empire Strikes Back
    2 A New Hope
    3 Return of the Jedi
    4 Revenge of the Sith
    5 Rogue One
    6 Attack of the Clones
    7 The Phantom Menace
    8 The Force Awakens
    9 Solo
    10 The Last Jedi/The Rise of Skywalker

    The Rise of Skywalker is an appallingly lazily written movie with tons of plot holes which they try in vain to cover up with flashy effects and bigger is better bullshit.....it is more rubbish the more times I watch it.

    Somehow Palpatine returned......

    Fuck off.

    More like somehow someone actually paid someone to come up with that shit.

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #19508

    @taniwharugby said in Movie review thread...:

    Havoc - Tom Hardy, Timothy Oliphant, Forest Whitaker

    Pretty decent, lots of John Wick.level killing

    3 massacred gangs out of 5 corrupt cops

    An OK watch

    The Raid meets Gangs of London

    Had a good twist which was revealed too early IMHO

    3 out of 5

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #19509

    @MiketheSnow said in Movie review thread...:

    @taniwharugby said in Movie review thread...:

    Havoc - Tom Hardy, Timothy Oliphant, Forest Whitaker

    Pretty decent, lots of John Wick.level killing

    3 massacred gangs out of 5 corrupt cops

    An OK watch

    The Raid meets Gangs of London

    Had a good twist which was revealed too early IMHO

    3 out of 5

    I liked it but the tone seemed a bit off to me, the weighty drama feel of it didn't quite mesh with the all out Indo style action (a genre I love), some of which is awesome.

    I really want to see The Raid 3 but Evans seems to be a West only filmmaker these days. Although I just found out the other day that Timo Tjahjanto (director of The Night Comes for Us - which is my favourite Indo action film) has a new film on Netflix that came out last year.

    Also watched:

    Sinners: Another horror style movie, but it's much more than that, it's also a music film, and a 1920/30s gangster film. In all honesty I would have preferred a straight 1920/1930s gangster film set in this world, but I still had a great time watching this. Stars Michael B Jordan (twice), Jack O'Connell, Delroy Lindo, and Halee Steinfeld and a few actors I've never seen before.

    Revenge of the Sith: Since it's being discussed, I'm glad for other people who like it (I think everyone should enjoy which ever Star Wars they like even if I don't like), it's still a shit movie to me, a disappointment when I first saw it in the cinema and a bigger disappointment when I rewatched it finally during Covid. Bad script, bad CGI, bad acting, bad directing, but as @mn5 also notes I didn't see it as a wide eyed kid which likely would have given me a different view of it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #19510

    I still think Star Wars (fuck your new names)
    Is better than ESB.
    And attack of the clones is awful.
    But other than that you're close.

    My RotJ memories are lining up, not getting in and having to go the next night.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Movie review thread...
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.