• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
278 Posts 46 Posters 15.2k Views
Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #133

    Goodhue was so offside off of that scrum (unless his teammates were further back than they had to be).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #134

    @act-crusader said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @dingo I look forward to the still shots and arrows pointing to who stands up first.

    No need. As far as I can tell no one has argued it wasn't Codie. The only argument appears to be that because the Crusaders was scrum was dominant (again unargued) therefore because of the zen of the thing, the penalty against the canes was/wasn't due to an obvious rule infringement.

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #135

    I think the Chiefs would have made a better game of this. The Canes are mud so far.

    Now that I’ve said, expect the come back 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to dingo on last edited by
    #136

    @dingo said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @act-crusader said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @dingo I look forward to the still shots and arrows pointing to who stands up first.

    No need. As far as I can tell no one has argued it wasn't Codie. The only argument appears to be that because the Crusaders was scrum was dominant (again unargued) therefore because of the zen of the thing, the penalty against the canes was/wasn't due to an obvious rule infringement.

    I don't agree with that analysis. Looked to me like Taylor popped up because the canes hooker or TH stood up rather than going backwards. It doesn't matter that codie was the first to pop up if the reason he popped was due to the canes not maintaining a bind.

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #137

    @damo said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @dingo said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @act-crusader said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @dingo I look forward to the still shots and arrows pointing to who stands up first.

    No need. As far as I can tell no one has argued it wasn't Codie. The only argument appears to be that because the Crusaders was scrum was dominant (again unargued) therefore because of the zen of the thing, the penalty against the canes was/wasn't due to an obvious rule infringement.

    I don't agree with that analysis. Looked to me like Taylor popped up because the canes hooker or TH stood up rather than going backwards. It doesn't matter that codie was the first to pop up if the reason he popped was due to the canes not maintaining a bind.

    I think we are in agree to disagree territory. You see what you see. I see otherwise. To be fair, you have a Ref who agreed with you at the time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #138

    Far too much one out play from the Hurricanes tonight. When we make a half break, our forwards are too far away and we just concede the turnover. I don't know why that was the strategy, especially against the rush defence.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #139

    Canes monstered.

    Average match though. Watched it on 6x catch up and it still wasn't up to much.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #140

    Todd blew it there. Catch and pass.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dingo
    wrote on last edited by
    #141

    Precision point kick there

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #142

    No variety on attack, and the battering ram isn't working. Razor has recreated the crusader team he played for, greater than the sum of the individual parts

    MachpantsM K 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #143

    The Lions/Tahs will be watching and wondering ‘why the fuck are we even bothering’

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #144

    Crusaders are just too good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #145

    @gunner said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    The Lions/Tahs will be watching and wondering ‘why the fuck are we even bothering’

    At least the final will be in NZ. Anything less than a NZ hosted final and NZ winner would be criminal

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #146

    If the Waratahs somehow win tonight, a second long haul flight in a week will set them up nicely for a 96 - 19.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MachpantsM Offline
    MachpantsM Offline
    Machpants
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #147

    @canefan I dunno about greater than the sum of its parts, it's mostly made up of all blacks. But best SR team by miles

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #148

    This shoulda been the final.

    I'm pissed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #149

    Credit to Razor, he's got this side humming. Very AB like in that you think you are in it, then make one mistake and they make you pay almost immediately.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #150

    @machpants said in Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF:

    @canefan I dunno about greater than the sum of its parts, it's mostly made up of all blacks. But best SR team by miles

    There are a bunch of guys who aren't ABs yet, I'm not convinced they are all of AB standard, but they play very well in the team framework

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #151

    So why is DMac in the AB matchday 23 and Mounga not?

    canefanC No QuarterN D 3 Replies Last reply
    7
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #152

    @canefan Good coaches fit the parts together. But this team has a lot of quality.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Crusaders v Hurricanes - SF
Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.