• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Bledisloe #1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
1.4k Posts 92 Posters 90.5k Views
Bledisloe #1
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #145

    @taniwharugby said in Bledisoe #1:

    what time is k/o for this one, NZT...I am off to Aus on Saturday so trying to work out these silly time zones things!

    yeah yeah, I know google and shit, but thats why I come here...

    edit: excellent, is in that article.

    7.45 on the east coast i believe

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #146

    @mariner4life said in Bledisoe #1:

    alt text

    3! 3 openside flankers ha ha ha

    We are Aussie....Phil Waugh, George Smith and Hoiles (started as a 7 and then changed to 8 )

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #147

    Pleased that Dane Coles has been picked ahead of Codie Taylor as the starting Hooker.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #148

    Would rather have Ennor over Bridge but can't fault the other selections.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #149

    That’s pretty much the strongest side they could have named at this stage. Might have swapped Read and Savea around, but that’s about it.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelbK Offline
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #150

    First time for a while I can say I feel a bit excited after the naming,

    Like the look of this team , on paper at least, hope it goes well

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #151

    @akan004 said in Bledisoe #1:

    Would rather have Ennor over Bridge but can't fault the other selections.

    Bridge plays either wing and even fullback if a couple of backs go down.

    Bridge is a better player as well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #152

    With that team, if Aussie beat us, we can stick a fork in the WC for this year.

    All over Mary, wipe ya leg.

    ACT CrusaderA rotatedR DonsteppaD 3 Replies Last reply
    10
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #153

    Strongest side possible sans Rettalick (and perhaps Crotty in theory, but he gets no more chances from me in the starting side as he just can't be relied on).

    I hope they run this side out the next two weeks come hell or high water and assess after that - combos must be built.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #154

    Big chance for Laumape to come off the bench and make everyone think Sonny Bill Who?

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #155

    @Hooroo said in Bledisoe #1:

    With that team, if Aussie beat us, we can stick a fork in the WC for this year.

    All over Mary, wipe ya leg.

    I know a stronger team than the one named....

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #156

    @rotated

    If fit, Crotty gets selected. Possibly as the bench midfielder ahead of Laumape.

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #157

    Ardie's extra height will be invaluable at 6.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #158

    @Hooroo said in Bledisoe #1:

    With that team, if Aussie beat us, we can stick a fork in the WC for this year.

    I wouldn't go that far, the ABs do tend to underperform when they play at weird/new venues, something they've zeroed in on this fixture going almost two weeks early. They've also lost the last three away fixtures to Australia in a World Cup year - so I wouldn't completely write them off, but it wouldn't be terribly comforting.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #159

    Ardie’s far more effective on the side of the scrum. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him and Cane basically playing left and right.

    kiwiinmelbK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #160

    I'm pleased with the backline. I think it's our strongest combination, sans SBW or Crotty off the bench for Laumape. Does anyone else feel like Goodhue has played at least another season longer than he actually has? Seems like he should have 20 odd caps rather than just 8!

    In the forwards I'm worried about a couple of things. Potential lack of height in general, mainly thanks to the inclusion of Savea, Cane and Todd in the same group of loose forwards, plus the combination of Read/Cane/Savea and how they'll gel. It would be really interesting to see what they did if we lost a loosie - any loosie - to injury. Does Todd come on, or does Pat T come on and Barrett goes to 6? I guess the scenario at the time will dictate this. I do find it odd though that they have a third openside flaker on the bench. Does this mean they're hell-bent on playing two opensiders at any given time?

    ACT CrusaderA Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to sparky on last edited by rotated
    #161

    @sparky said in Bledisoe #1:

    @rotated

    If fit, Crotty gets selected. Possibly as the bench midfielder ahead of Laumape.

    Bench is fine - I am looking mostly at the XV, the bench composition would change based on Barrett moving back there anyway once Rettalick is fit.

    I just have no appetite to sacrifice the limited opportunities left to build a centre combination for whatever incremental theoretical benefit Crotty brings as a starter.

    ALB and Goodhue have both made almost every post a winner in black and in the case of ALB it has almost been a four year run - it's time to give him the 12 jersey and let him make it his own.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #162

    @Donsteppa said in Bledisoe #1:

    could have named at this stage. Might have swapped Read and Savea around, but that’

    have to think that if Hansen & Co are as smart as us, Read/Savea/Cane will swap around a bit anyway to get the fit just right.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #163

    @shark said in Bledisoe #1:

    I'm pleased with the backline. I think it's our strongest combination, sans SBW or Crotty off the bench for Laumape. Does anyone else feel like Goodhue has played at least another season longer than he actually has? Seems like he should have 20 odd caps rather than just 8!

    In the forwards I'm worried about a couple of things. Potential lack of height in general, mainly thanks to the inclusion of Savea, Cane and Todd in the same group of loose forwards, plus the combination of Read/Cane/Savea and how they'll gel. It would be really interesting to see what they did if we lost a loosie - any loosie - to injury. Does Todd come on, or does Pat T come on and Barrett goes to 6? I guess the scenario at the time will dictate this. I do find it odd though that they have a third openside flaker on the bench. Does this mean they're hell-bent on playing two opensiders at any given time?

    It’s all foxing before a RWC. We’ve seen this story before since Henry/Hansen took over.

    sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #164

    @ACT-Crusader said in Bledisoe #1:

    @shark said in Bledisoe #1:

    I'm pleased with the backline. I think it's our strongest combination, sans SBW or Crotty off the bench for Laumape. Does anyone else feel like Goodhue has played at least another season longer than he actually has? Seems like he should have 20 odd caps rather than just 8!

    In the forwards I'm worried about a couple of things. Potential lack of height in general, mainly thanks to the inclusion of Savea, Cane and Todd in the same group of loose forwards, plus the combination of Read/Cane/Savea and how they'll gel. It would be really interesting to see what they did if we lost a loosie - any loosie - to injury. Does Todd come on, or does Pat T come on and Barrett goes to 6? I guess the scenario at the time will dictate this. I do find it odd though that they have a third openside flaker on the bench. Does this mean they're hell-bent on playing two opensiders at any given time?

    It’s all foxing before a RWC. We’ve seen this story before since Henry/Hansen took over.

    With the flankers you mean? That would make sense as it's a significant departure from the contemporary AB model of having a larger blindside flanker and a drastic move away from their search for a bruiser to replace the Squire / Kaino qualities.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Bledisloe #1
Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.