• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Red cards

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
rwc
111 Posts 34 Posters 3.3k Views
Red cards
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #75

    @No-Quarter said in Red cards:

    @Billy-Webb said in Red cards:

    @Rembrandt said in Red cards:

    Genuine question for those pro the yellow cards on the kiwi props as my rugby career ended before my balls dropped.

    How does someone defend a try-line when an attacker is diving in leading with their head and you are camped on that line? (Or worse are a couple metres away and have to act fast)
    Maybe I'm not understanding the concept of 'swinging arm' but I would have thought that if you didn't use your arm and instead braced with your bodyweight that that could be classified as a no-arms tackle.

    I tried to do a youtube search for great prop tries..but the highlights are all just overweight outside backs

    Arms out in front of you. Take him onto your body, wrap man and ball and hold him up. Not so hard.

    Except that the attacking player will always try to punch through the hole so will nearly always be to your left or right where using your arms to stop him is your only option.

    Fair enough. Provided you're not swinging your arm, then a normal arms and shoulder tackle.
    Can't / don't want to comment on the head contact if the player has his head down in a bull-charge. I'm buggered if I know how that gets refereed. Judgment call by the ref?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #76

    @MiketheSnow said in Red cards:

    @mariner4life said in Red cards:

    @MiketheSnow said in Red cards:

    @mariner4life said in Red cards:

    For the "just tackle lower" crowd, what exactly was Ofa T supposed to do differently?

    Not lead with a swinging arm to the head.

    Let the ball carrier continue his trajectory to the dirt, then jackal.

    Bullshit Mike. You've played. In that spot you do the same thing.

    Ah no.

    Never got penalised for a late and/or high tackle. Or swinging arm.

    Couple of instances in the France v Tonga match where the French players were happy for the Tongans to gain one, maybe two more metres going forward as they fell to the ground and then swooped in to try to steal the ball.

    On the goal line you don't have the luxury of those metres but as explained on another thread better to not infringe, concede a try, but still be on the park than infringe and be binned.

    In the case of Ofa though the Namib player wasn’t falling. He went low and drove into Ofa. At the time he committed to the tackle Ofa had no way of knowing the ball carrier was going to fall, only that he was driving forwards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #77

    So if a team is unable to stop a driving maul legally and it's about to score, they should be allowed to collapse it right?

    If you can't win a lineout legally, you should be able to drag down the jumper or take out the lifter. It's not fair otherwise.

    antipodeanA taniwharugbyT J 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #78

    @Bones said in Red cards:

    So if a team is unable to stop a driving maul legally and it's about to score, they should be allowed to collapse it right?

    Technically you can if you're in your in-goal. 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #79

    @Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #80

    @taniwharugby said in Red cards:

    @Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)

    No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.

    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #81

    @Bones said in Red cards:

    @taniwharugby said in Red cards:

    @Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)

    No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.

    That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to JC on last edited by
    #82

    @JC said in Red cards:

    @Bones said in Red cards:

    @taniwharugby said in Red cards:

    @Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)

    No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.

    That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.

    Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is deeply offensive.

    JCJ CatograndeC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    I just happened to see highlights of that argie fella hitting Farrell. Did he get the red for a shoulder charge? Because his arms never even made contact with Farrell

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #84

    @Bones said in Red cards:

    @JC said in Red cards:

    @Bones said in Red cards:

    @taniwharugby said in Red cards:

    @Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)

    No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.

    That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.

    Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is deeply offensive.

    I’d apologise but I suspect you’d lose interest part way through.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #85

    @Bones said in Red cards:

    @JC said in Red cards:

    @Bones said in Red cards:

    @taniwharugby said in Red cards:

    @Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)

    No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.

    That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.

    Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is deeply offensive. completely true.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #86

    @Catogrande said in Red cards:

    @Bones said in Red cards:

    @JC said in Red cards:

    @Bones said in Red cards:

    @taniwharugby said in Red cards:

    @Bones they did try changing the rules a few years back didnt they (re mauls)

    No idea. I'm hardly going to go searching out any facts.

    That right there is the level of dedication we should all be striving for. All you younger fellas watch and learn from a pro.

    Steady on old man! The implication I'm no longer younger is deeply offensive. completely true.

    40 is the new GFY.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #87

    @Bones I'm surprised you remember.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #88

    @canefan Yeah, straight shoulder to the head.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    Easy RC decision for the Cannuck’s shoulder to the head clean out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    Ben Skeen is a fucking whiney little pissant fluffybunny who is the villain of this world cup

    TeWaioT 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    Should we rename the thread title to

    “When you want to rant about Skeen”

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    Said in a small-balled whine

    "Ah, gerome, I just need to show you vision of this thing that happened right in front of you 5 minutes ago, but I found with 40 cameras and super slow mo.

    Let's watch it for 3 minutes

    I recommend a public hanging"

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #93

    @mariner4life said in Red cards:

    Ben Skeen is a fucking whiney little pissant fluffybunny who is the villain of this world cup

    Second to Ben Stokes in the Most Hated NZer stakes

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #94

    Drew Mitchell reads the Fern

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Red cards
Sports Talk
rwc
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.