• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hurricanes v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
hurricanescrusaders
497 Posts 49 Posters 21.0k Views
Hurricanes v Crusaders
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #235

    @tim said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Laumape ran a nice line with good acceleration for his try. A couple of nice short passes before it. Then he does two dumb things to end the half.

    We do like to carry ex leaguies who like to do stupid things like shoulder charges etc. maybe that’s what he needs to get in black?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #236

    I have to say that Williams really does see things that aren’t there and doesn’t see things that are.
    He’s quite baffling and judging by the player reactions they think so to.
    He had a running discussion with the halfbacks trying to explain why a ball sitting well out the back of a ruck/scrum isn’t out in his opinion

    BovidaeB taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #237

    Love looks a bit like a young Cruden.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #238

    @voodoo said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Don't disagree that it's lucky to be yellow in the context of current rulings, but I also think it SHOULD be only yellow. There was no intent to hurt (like a big punch), no way to inflict real harm if it went slightly askew (like a tip tackle or neck roll)

    It was a dickhead move, and a yellow is right.

    Just like there was no intent to hurt when old mate from Scotland got marched a couple of weeks ago for a forearm to the neck area going into a tackle.

    This one is worse IMO, he deliberately dropped his forearm into a guy who was on the ground.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #239

    @gt12 said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Love looks a bit like a young Cruden.

    So he'll be starring for the Chiefs in a couple of years then ....

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #240

    @crucial Halfbacks make terrible refs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Gunner on last edited by gt12
    #241

    @gunner said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @voodoo said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Don't disagree that it's lucky to be yellow in the context of current rulings, but I also think it SHOULD be only yellow. There was no intent to hurt (like a big punch), no way to inflict real harm if it went slightly askew (like a tip tackle or neck roll)

    It was a dickhead move, and a yellow is right.

    Just like there was no intent to hurt when old mate from Scotland got marched a couple of weeks ago for a forearm to the neck area going into a tackle.

    This one is worse IMO, he deliberately dropped his forearm into a guy who was on the ground.

    He did that to hurt him too, it’s a RC and pretty dirty

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #242

    @nepia said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    @gt12 said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Love looks a bit like a young Cruden.

    So he'll be starring for the Chiefs in a couple of years then ....

    Yes Please.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #243

    @crucial was one where Hall had hands on at the back for several seconds, the canes player advances, ref must have warned him, then you hear him say to the player: best not to try or something like that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #244

    NZ refs seem to look very, very hard for reasons to mitigate against cards.

    I'm not sure it does us a favour when we're playing international rugby, because it seems to me that refs from most other countries are much more willing to dish cards - and our players don't learn to be disciplined enough.

    I'll be pretty surprised if the judiciary don't decide that meets the red card threshold. That was actually a bit of dirt.

    1 Reply Last reply
    10
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by Duluth
    #245

    Crusaders missed more tackles than they normally do in that half

    hur v cru.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    wrote on last edited by
    #246

    Why do Canes players do these dumb plays. Just too many yellow cards this year

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    wrote on last edited by
    #247

    Jane’s analysis was pretty good, but no mention of territory?

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #248

    Wtf was that Havili?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #249

    @gt12 said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Jane’s analysis was pretty good, but no mention of territory?

    Didn't want to give all the secrets away in case the Saders were livestreaming to their dressing room?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #250

    Whetu Douglas isn't in the same class as the rest of the Crusders forwards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #251

    Great IWL gets blamed for the bad lineout. He was good in the first half.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mackerzzzz
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #252

    @canes4life said in Hurricanes v Crusaders:

    Great IWL gets blamed for the bad lineout. He was good in the first half.

    Yeah blackwell was not existent

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #253

    Great try from Goosen

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #254

    This is some game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Hurricanes v Crusaders
Rugby Matches
hurricanescrusaders
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.