• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Bledisloe 1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
2.1k Posts 99 Posters 176.9k Views
Bledisloe 1
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #1778

    @antipodean said in Bledisloe 1:

    I'm not entirely convinced Foley was trying to waste time after the ref blew time back on. He looked more to be waiting for his forward pack to get out of their huddle and be paying attention after the ref blew time off. Still, he should have realized the ref wasn't going to be patient after telling them to hurry up.

    There definitely was time wasting but it's a bit hard to tell how egregious it was when the footage is mostly just replays and close ups of random players.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by Chris B.
    #1779

    @ACT-Crusader Yeah - the point I'm more interested in is why the defending wing often seems not to be marking an attacking wing who's stationed for a cross-kick. On attack, at international level, I'd back a five eighth to execute that kick more often than not.

    But, I don't believe it's that the wing has gone to sleep because it's under 11s stuff to watch what your opposing wing is doing. It's got to be a ploy, but I don't understand it.

    Don't really like the cross kick option inside our 22 - nor chip kicks, nor bombs in that zone. Kick deep, chase hard. 🙂

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1780

    @mariner4life said in Bledisloe 1:

    @taniwharugby said in Bledisloe 1:

    @mariner4life go back and read the thread, people bitching about DP and HS.

    Just saying they come in cold, and get grilled.

    Well there needs to be development, don't expect weekly changes, but they can still develop without doing that.

    What has happened this year is the result of 2+ years of ignoring issues in front of you.

    i think we are also a victim of our structure. Basically, from mid-June, if you are not playing in a test, you have nothing meaningful to play. And with all due respect, NPC rugby is a glorified club game compared to test rugby.

    So basically the first choice guys play, everyone else goes cold.

    Still think we are allowed to say they were average because they were. The reasons for that are of course arguable - not enough game time, experience at test level, their opposites were better etc. DP has had a couple of goes now and hasn’t shown out on either occasion. Sotutu’s first chance. It’s not the end for them, but not in favour of sharing AB jerseys around - esp. when the team is struggling. They can earn them - impressing at training, injuries, playing well at NPC. Their performance doesn’t help.

    If NPC is glorified club rugby, then RTS should be no where near the AB squad.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by voodoo
    #1781

    @Chris-B you can only assume they're backing themselves to cover that ground while the kick is in the air. Perhaps even encouraging it to potentially isolate the wide player. And if they don't kick, they're there as an extra body in the midfield.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #1782

    After reading this thread before watching

    • Wasnt a bad game at all, great entertainment and drama
    • Swain is a fluffybunny, if he gets less than 6 weeks for that, it is a joke
    • Our defence is still pretty shite, just everything about it, alignment, narrow, staggered, gaps, no cohesion...I love watching the Irish d line which work as one
    • Rough YC on the Wobbly 9 for pulling down maul, I dont think they even tripped over him
    • After receiving the crosskick, CC shaped to kick, with probably the fastest guy on the field at full speed, took it to deck, lost control...nek minut Aus score, huge moment of indecision was quite costly
    • We did some good stuff, had nice structure and played with accuracy and pace at times, but just cant maintain it
    • Final play...well, wouldnt be a test match with a Frenchie in charge if there wasnt a penalty for tackling a player hurdling someone, a deal or something unusual!
      If this is a precursor for WR to pull thier fingers out thier arses and stop teams dragging thier feet and slowing the game, awesome, but I suspect it will just be a moment that will live in infamy.

    Oh, funniest comment, think it was TJ...Camera pans over Foster then Rennie, and TJ comments that they are both former Chiefs coaches, with 2 time winner Rennie, and then nothing, sounded like he stopped in mid-sentence!!

    voodooV boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    8
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by Crucial
    #1783

    Something else that occurred to me was that if the situation last night was reversed this board would be piling full bore onto Mounga and Foster for being dumb in the act and not preparing players better. Instead (most) Aussies are piling onto the ref.
    Some of that will come from the reaction of the Aussie comms team who tried to convince their audience that the ref was totally at fault.

    TordahT 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1784

    @taniwharugby yeah that card on the canary yellow 9 was very rough!

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #1785

    That Australian commentary was pretty disgusting., there.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #1786

    Was it Lomax who escaped a YC for the lift and slam?

    KiwiMurphK NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #1787

    @Crazy-Horse said in Bledisloe 1:

    @NTA said in Bledisloe 1:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Bledisloe 1:

    Only going off one 'real time' viewing but I think Aussie were lucky to dodge another card when Jordan has his legs taken out from under him when going for a high ball. I think it was Koroibete. We scored a few phases after that so it was forgotten about. At the time the ref seemed to ignore it, then it sounded like he was told it was something that should be revisited and then we scored. Unsurprisingly there were no replays of it.

    The call was that Koroibete was pushed into the contact accidentally by one of his team mates. I think we had one of those previously (maybe a NH Test?) where a player pulled out of contact but an accidental collision forced them into the zone.

    Quite possibly, but I am not sure how you can tell that was the call from the coverage. Did you hear a conversation between the ref and the TMO?

    Pretty sure I picked it up from Reynal's mic - had a look at the video at 53:55 game clock:

    B Barrett puts up a bomb from just outside his 22, landing on AB 10m line
    Koroibete is a bit in no man's land, looking for the ball but then realising he's run back too far. He pulls out of the contest, watches Jordan, setting for a tackle when he lands.
    Kellaway, meanwhile, is roaring into the zone with eyes on the ball. He impacts Koroibete, forcing him into Jordan's path.
    Reynal says pretty much immediately "No he was pushed. Play on!"
    As the ball comes out of the next ruck, he clearly says "He was pushed by his player. Accidental. Yeah pushed by gold"

    And then I think he say something like "off his feet" but it isn't clear what he's referring to.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #1788

    @MiketheSnow said in Bledisloe 1:

    Was it Lomax who escaped a YC for the lift and slam?

    Yep. Then quickly hooked.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #1789

    @MiketheSnow said in Bledisloe 1:

    Was it Lomax who escaped a YC for the lift and slam?

    I don't think it warranted yellow - past horizontal is penalty minimum but card is determined by landing on shoulder/neck/head.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #1790

    @voodoo said in Bledisloe 1:

    @taniwharugby yeah that card on the canary yellow 9 was very rough!

    Incidental contact at best, then S Barrett tripped over himself. Comedy gold!

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #1791

    @NTA said in Bledisloe 1:

    @voodoo said in Bledisloe 1:

    @taniwharugby yeah that card on the canary yellow 9 was very rough!

    Incidental contact at best, then S Barrett tripped over himself. Comedy gold canary yellow!

    FIFY

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1792

    @KiwiMurph said in Bledisloe 1:

    @MiketheSnow said in Bledisloe 1:

    Was it Lomax who escaped a YC for the lift and slam?

    Yep. Then quickly hooked.

    Looking at his action and Swain's action the impact of Swain's actions are far more serious.

    But there was far more intent in Lomax's action IMHO

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #1793

    @MiketheSnow said in Bledisloe 1:

    But there was far more intent in Lomax's action IMHO

    er, you usually talk alot of sense, but that sir is utter nonsense! Swain was malicious, sole intention was to take his knee out.

    MiketheSnowM BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by MiketheSnow
    #1794

    @taniwharugby said in Bledisloe 1:

    @MiketheSnow said in Bledisloe 1:

    But there was far more intent in Lomax's action IMHO

    er, you usually talk alot of sense, but that sir is utter nonsense! Swain was malicious, sole intention was to take his knee out.

    Swain wasn't even looking

    He just grabbed what was available to him - on the second attempt - and attempted & succeeded in driving the player off his feet

    Happens at nearly every breakdown

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #1795

    @Damo said in Bledisloe 1:

    @Billy-Tell said in Bledisloe 1:

    @Stargazer said in Bledisloe 1:

    @Billy-Tell said in Bledisloe 1:

    @Stargazer said in Bledisloe 1:

    alt text

    It’s a scrum not free kick. Law 20 “taking a penalty or free kick”

    This literally comes from the World Rugby website (Law 9.7.d)!

    Have you read law 20? The section I referred to?

    A penalty or free-kick must be taken without delay.

    Sanction: scrum.

    Interesting.

    I had thought ref was wrong as timewastimg is a free kick. Arguably he was right. I suggest it makes no difference as we would have taken a scrum anyway.

    I feel sure it was bent arm - did he actually give a penalty?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #1796

    On the Clarke defence - if he's being told to "shoot" or if he's getting lost - either way it needs to be addressed. If he's dithering and then shooting, he's timing it poorly and not committing. If he's drifting in and then rushing up because he's identified wrong, he needs to stop drifting in.

    Take away Sotutu's mind-numbing kick and I thought he had a really good game, especially for a guy sitting in the stands for months on end. He was busy as and definitely added something different, accuracy getting the ball away is something he could teach Rieko.

    I thought de Groot was busy as, as well - I felt like I saw him a lot in the first 20-30 minutes, carting it up and hitting blokes/breakdowns on defence - just not as much impact as in previous games.

    Valetini is a bit scary - he's basically Ardie, but proper loosie size.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1797

    @taniwharugby said in Bledisloe 1:

    @MiketheSnow said in Bledisloe 1:

    But there was far more intent in Lomax's action IMHO

    er, you usually talk alot of sense, but that sir is utter nonsense! Swain was malicious, sole intention was to take his knee out.

    No it wasn't....but I can't tell if you're taking the piss or not.

    Lomax's intent was to lift above the horizontal, not sure if it was his action to right the aussie or just plain luck that he only ended up landing on his side, because he had begun his descent with his shoulders facing the turf.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Bledisloe 1
Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.