• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks 2024

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
7.4k Posts 135 Posters 648.3k Views
All Blacks 2024
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Blunders
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #46

    @Bones I would add De Groot, he had 1 bad game but was solid in the final once our first choice frontrow was available. I would be happy to work with him going forward.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Blunders on last edited by
    #47

    @Blunders

    Agree with that. Needs to learn how to hold the ball better too. The likes of Conrad and Ma'a creates tries by how and where the held the ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Blunders on last edited by
    #48

    @Blunders yeah he's come on hugely in his carrying into defence, so a definite string added to his bow. His option taking in space still needs work but hopefully he doesn't get used as much in the carrying into defence role and can get running some great lines at pace and develop his vision.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #49

    @Bones I think Taylor was excellent this year, although not as good in the final.

    Agree though re ST not.being afforded the same opportunities to play back into form as Taylor did previously, when his form was considerably worse, but still doesn't take away from Taylor being very good this year.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #50

    @taniwharugby Nope not taking away from that, I just think ST woulda been better - and I can't help but feel Taylor's form last year help shaped how great we think he was this year too.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • D Online
    D Online
    DaGrubster
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    I really think that Aumua needs to be brought into the ABs this year - that would make a very strong group of hookers

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    Punch_up
    replied to Victor Meldrew on last edited by
    #52

    @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    What are peoples thoughts on midfield? Any bolters? QT?

    This is tough one. To really answer it, I have to mention some of my AB midfield pet peeves:

    1. Picking players out of position (e.g. fullbacks or wingers at 13)
    2. I love pace at 13. However, I generally dislike the play of Winger/Centre hybrid players (e.g. Ennor).
    3. There is a bit of a logjam Ito NPC midfield talent getting meaningful Super Rugby gametime. So, the chances of AB Bolters are not high ATM imo.

    It's very frustrating watching Ioane play at 13 for the ABs. Their outside backs are traditionally their strength and his distribution is not great. JB at 12 is pretty good.

    Possible bolters:

    1. Levi Aumua (gainline tank with better than expected passing & offloading skills). He reminds me of the hedgehog in the fox and hedgehog story. The Fox does many things well, but the hedgehog does one thing extremely well and prevails.
    2. Super Young guns: Meihana Grindlay & Riley Higgins. Not saying make them the ABs first choice combo, but IF they get Super Rugby gametime and go well, they could be EOY tour bolters in 2024 or 2025. Again, see pet peeve number 3 above
    3. PPL have cooled on him (perhaps myself included), but PUJ has the all-round game for 13 that many of the other previously capped candidates lack and he's at that age that post-2015 AB selectors love (midfield players supposedly reach maturity in their mid-to-late 20s).
    P Victor MeldrewV mariner4lifeM 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    ploughboy
    replied to Punch_up on last edited by
    #53

    @Punch_up said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Victor-Meldrew said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    What are peoples thoughts on midfield? Any bolters? QT?

    This is tough one. To really answer it, I have to mention some of my AB midfield pet peeves:

    1. Picking players out of position (e.g. fullbacks or wingers at 13)
    2. I love pace at 13. However, I generally dislike the play of Winger/Centre hybrid players (e.g. Ennor).
    3. There is a bit of a logjam Ito NPC midfield talent getting meaningful Super Rugby gametime. So, the chances of AB Bolters are not high ATM imo.

    It's very frustrating watching Ioane play at 13 for the ABs. Their outside backs are traditionally their strength and his distribution is not great. JB at 12 is pretty good.

    Possible bolters:

    1. Levi Aumua (gainline tank with better than expected passing & offloading skills). He reminds me of the hedgehog in the fox and hedgehog story. The Fox does many things well, but the hedgehog does one thing extremely well and prevails.
    2. Super Young guns: Meihana Grindlay & Riley Higgins. Not saying make them the ABs first choice combo, but IF they get Super Rugby gametime and go well, they could be EOY tour bolters in 2024 or 2025. Again, see pet peeve number 3 above
    3. PPL have cooled on him (perhaps myself included), but PUJ has the all-round game for 13 that many of the other previously capped candidates lack and he's at that age that post-2015 AB selectors love (midfield players supposedly reach maturity in their mid-to-late 20s).

    add to point 2 gideon-wrampling

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to Punch_up on last edited by
    #54

    @Punch_up

    Great, thanks. Will watch out for these guys.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Punch_up on last edited by
    #55

    @Punch_up lol what? Have a crack at RI's distribution but JB is pretty good? That's a crack up.

    JB is super limited in vision and passing. Bless him he's a big munter though

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #56

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Blunders said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @DaGrubster he has the physical size but he needs to show the grunt and consistency. Lord is a bit of a rake but has the height on his side.

    Lord has a lot more than that on his side. I doubt there's a huge difference in the size of these two. There is a stark difference between their skills and athleticism though.

    Height no, size yes. Parkinson is a unit, Lord still a bit of a twig.

    Crazy HorseC MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #57

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Blunders said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @DaGrubster he has the physical size but he needs to show the grunt and consistency. Lord is a bit of a rake but has the height on his side.

    Lord has a lot more than that on his side. I doubt there's a huge difference in the size of these two. There is a stark difference between their skills and athleticism though.

    Height no, size yes. Parkinson is a unit, Lord still a bit of a twig.

    Lord is no longer a twig. He was noticeably bulkier last year and he was physical to go with it. He just needs to outgrow his injury problems.

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    chchfanatic
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    I don’t think Sam Whitelock is finished yet. I reckon he’ll go around again. Be back for the 2027 World Cup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    frugby
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #59

    @Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Blunders said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @DaGrubster he has the physical size but he needs to show the grunt and consistency. Lord is a bit of a rake but has the height on his side.

    Lord has a lot more than that on his side. I doubt there's a huge difference in the size of these two. There is a stark difference between their skills and athleticism though.

    Height no, size yes. Parkinson is a unit, Lord still a bit of a twig.

    Lord is no longer a twig. He was noticeably bulkier last year and he was physical to go with it. He just needs to outgrow his injury problems.

    He is bulkier, but he still has more filling out to do I think. I feel if you put him next to Retallick and Whitelock he would still look noticeably smaller.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #60

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Blunders said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @DaGrubster he has the physical size but he needs to show the grunt and consistency. Lord is a bit of a rake but has the height on his side.

    Lord has a lot more than that on his side. I doubt there's a huge difference in the size of these two. There is a stark difference between their skills and athleticism though.

    Height no, size yes. Parkinson is a unit, Lord still a bit of a twig.

    Get him onto the Ethan Blackadder workout schedule. That’ll sort him.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to frugby on last edited by
    #61

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Blunders said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @DaGrubster he has the physical size but he needs to show the grunt and consistency. Lord is a bit of a rake but has the height on his side.

    Lord has a lot more than that on his side. I doubt there's a huge difference in the size of these two. There is a stark difference between their skills and athleticism though.

    Height no, size yes. Parkinson is a unit, Lord still a bit of a twig.

    Lord is no longer a twig. He was noticeably bulkier last year and he was physical to go with it. He just needs to outgrow his injury problems.

    He is bulkier, but he still has more filling out to do I think. I feel if you put him next to Retallick and Whitelock he would still look noticeably smaller.

    We've already had Retallick saying Lord is bigger.

    MN5M F 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Bones on last edited by MN5
    #62

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Crazy-Horse said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Bones said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @Blunders said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    @DaGrubster he has the physical size but he needs to show the grunt and consistency. Lord is a bit of a rake but has the height on his side.

    Lord has a lot more than that on his side. I doubt there's a huge difference in the size of these two. There is a stark difference between their skills and athleticism though.

    Height no, size yes. Parkinson is a unit, Lord still a bit of a twig.

    Lord is no longer a twig. He was noticeably bulkier last year and he was physical to go with it. He just needs to outgrow his injury problems.

    He is bulkier, but he still has more filling out to do I think. I feel if you put him next to Retallick and Whitelock he would still look noticeably smaller.

    We've already had Retallick saying Lord is bigger.

    Well he’s gonna sound like a cock if he says he’s smaller isn’t he ?

    Of course Retallick is gonna talk up the newbie.

    nostrildamusN BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    Lord looked bulkier to me this year, commented on it as soon as I saw him. he still looks to be filling out as is not unusual for a tall kid like him. One of reasons I like about Holland, he seems to have weight etc already.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    Holland has good no-nonsense solid joints on him too, perfect for a lock.

    FrankF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • FrankF Offline
    FrankF Offline
    Frank
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by
    #65

    @nostrildamus said in All Blacks 2024 - no interminable Foster arguments:

    Holland has good no-nonsense solid joints on him too, perfect for a lock.

    Is he actually any good at rugby?

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    3

All Blacks 2024
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.