SF Crusaders v Blues

[antipodean]

@nzzp said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

by the laws, that's a red these days.

If that's not a 20min RC, then nothing in the tackle area should be.

[Darren]

Hate to say it but I’d give that a red.
No excuse for head contact there.
But I bet that will stay yellow.

[nzzp]

@NTA said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

@NTA said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

@nzzp said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

by the laws, that's a red these days.

Prediction: it'll stay yellow because Sotutu dipped 2.6mm right before contact.

Prediction based on this prediction: non-Crusaders well be outraged when this happens

if you are surprise by card lotteiries, you dn't watch much rugby

[Bones]

Blues having an actual kick chase sure does make the kicking tactic look better. If only the ABs were allowed to chase kicks.

[KiwiMurph]

Much better there from Clarke

[taniwharugby]

isnt a good look that Hoskins hasnt been taken off for an HIA after a clear head clash

[NTA]

My predictions above are based purely on the form guide of TMO decisions recently.

To me, the tackler never lowered their height and should be red

[Bones]

Just ignore the WJ high tackle?

[nzzp]

@NTA said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

To me, the tackler never lowered their height and should be red

and came from 30 m away too!

[KiwiMurph]

Incredible by Lam

[nzzp]

oh that was veyr good rugby.

Where has this team been?

[No Quarter]

Superb stuff from Lam, having a great match so far

[nzzp]

remains yellow.

[KiwiMurph]

Remain a yellow despite Ennor running from halfway

'Yeah'

[Canes4life]

Lam for the ABs. Got the size, got the skillset, got speed but most important lot he’s played like this for a while now.

[Bones]

If only Lam had a finesse game and wasn't just a crash ball merchant.

[taniwharugby]

@No-Quarter said in SF Crusaders v Blues:

Superb stuff from Lam, having a great match season so far

Fixed for you

[Steven Harris]

Superb set piece try

[akan004]

Nice

[KiwiMurph]

Great use of the extra man