-
@NTA said in The Failed policy of Multiculturalism:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in The Failed policy of Multiculturalism:
So given that, can you blame them at all for erring on the side of caution?
No. If you're only going to take the very worst, then no. Can't blame them at all. Its new and scary and easy to assume the worst, based on what they see and are satisfied with. I grew up in smalltown Australia and mistrust of the new is a way of life.
I'm not saying Islam is 100% right and should be left completely to its own devices. But you're not going to assist in reform or assimilation at any level if you keep marginalising it through ignorance and fear.
I think the awful treatment of women by Muslims is not constrained to their worst/extremes.
My observation is that sort of treatment is commonplace.
-
Yup, I'm pretty sick of the arguments that claim "ignorance" is why people don't like Islam, or that it's a religion we in the west could never understand.
It's not difficult to understand what happens in Muslim majority countries. The situation for women and homosexuals, among other people, is fucking dire largely due to the teachings of the Koran. It's not unreasonable at all for people in western countries to oppose the spread of such a toxic, backwards ideology in their own back yard. Ignorance has nothing to do with it, in fact quite the opposite, the more you learn about Islam the more you should oppose it.
And as @Baron-Silas-Greenback the line between moderate Muslim and fundamentalist Muslim is blurred at best.
-
This post is deleted!
-
I liked this comment
"A common argument that “Useful Infidels” (Useful idiots) raise when they want to ignore bad things happening because of Islam is to shut down those pointing the problem out by saying. ” But not all Muslims do that.” It is an argument that attacks a straw man as those condemning these problems have never and will never claim that all Muslims are responsible or that all Muslims think that way. The reality is that “Useful infidels” who make that comment do not care about the people who are being affected or hurt. In their warped world view, they will not care until ALL Muslims are responsible which means of course that they will never care."
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback no, they don't say that all muslims do XYZ, but they do say that all islam must be stopped. i.e. a mosque can't be built in bendigo, no muslim refugees, etc.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in The Failed policy of Multiculturalism:
You think Islam will reform or assimilate if they allow a mosque to be built in Bendigo? When has Islam been shown to reform or assimilate in any of the dozens of towns and cities in western nations that have permitted mosques to be built?
do you not think there are moderate muslims in western countries, who lead relatively normal lives and play a normal role in society? or do they not count somehow? is SBW not assimilated?
-
@reprobate said in The Failed policy of Multiculturalism:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback no, they don't say that all muslims do XYZ, but they do say that all islam must be stopped. i.e. a mosque can't be built in bendigo, no muslim refugees, etc.
And what exactly is wrong with attacking an aggressive ideology that hates the western way of life??
-
@Baron-Silas-Greenback
do you see the irony in making that 'not all muslims' post and then stating that the ideology as a whole is a problem? does SBW hate the western way of life? must he be stopped for us to be safe in our homes? -
@reprobate said in The Failed policy of Multiculturalism:
@Baron-Silas-Greenback
do you see the irony in making that 'not all muslims' post and then stating that the ideology as a whole is a problem? does SBW hate the western way of life? must he be stopped for us to be safe in our homes?There is no irony. Some Muslims dont follow the ideology as strictly as others. Pretty self evident I would have thought. If some Muslims wont voluntarily abandon the nasty side of an ideology, they should be forced to, or forced to leave.
And give up trying to create a straw man with SBW.
-
@reprobate said in The Failed policy of Multiculturalism:
@Rancid-Schnitzel said in The Failed policy of Multiculturalism:
You think Islam will reform or assimilate if they allow a mosque to be built in Bendigo? When has Islam been shown to reform or assimilate in any of the dozens of towns and cities in western nations that have permitted mosques to be built?
do you not think there are moderate muslims in western countries, who lead relatively normal lives and play a normal role in society? or do they not count somehow? is SBW not assimilated?
What on earth does that have to do with what I wrote? Did you even read the quote you responded to?
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel you implied that it was not possible for Muslims to be part of western society, 'when has Islam ever... assimilated'. i gave an example, known to all on this site, to the contrary.
-
@reprobate said in The Failed policy of Multiculturalism:
@Rancid-Schnitzel you implied that it was not possible for Muslims to be part of western society, 'when has Islam ever... assimilated'. i gave an example, known to all on this site, to the contrary.
I fucking did not. For Christ sake, read the entire discussion rather than cherry picking sentences that trigger you.
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel okay, i guess I'm misunderstanding then
-
@reprobate SBW is an interesting example. Obviously he didn't assimilate as he is from Auckland but putting that aside his recent actions indicate he is starting to go against aspects of Western life as he moves more towards the fundamental teachings of Islam. He went against his own team and employer by taping over their most important sponsors logo not because of some moral objection, but because charging interest is forbidden in Islam. He is now also associating with preachers like Menk who are on record as saying "homosexuals are worse than animals" despite gay rights being hugely important in NZ. It will be interesting to see where he is in another 10 years, and if his name is still Sonny.
And that is the problem with Islam. It's important to separate the people from the ideology. By that I mean Islam and Sharia Law are not compatible with Western Democracy and Western law. They are completely at odds with each other, and in my opinion (which is supported by a mountain of evidence) Western Democracy and Western Law are far superior.
The only way that Muslims are able to successfully assimilate into Western society is if they modify Islam to conform to Western Law. The people you call "moderate Muslims" are more accurately described as modifiers. They choose to disregard a lot of the passages of the Koran and by doing so do not accurately represent Islam.
I am very comfortable opposing the spread of Islam in Western countries, as 1) I (we) cannot rely on those that choose to follow the Koran to omit the abhorrent passages and 2) there will always, always be those that don't. Which gives rise to terrorism, pushing an idea through the use of violence and intimidation, which is one of the worst things imaginable when you consider what Western values are built on (I.E freedom of speech).
This is a great article that helps to articulate what I am talking about, I would encourage you to have a read:
-
You called?
-
@No-Quarter Good post NQ and an interesting article and I can quite see the logic in it. However, for me, the logic falls down when it states that the majority of Muslims that do not follow the Qu'ran religiously are not representative of Islam and cannot be considered true Muslims. Why I say this is that all things change with time and religion in particular has shown to become more moderate over time, certainly by the vast majority. To my mind the real representatives of any religion are the majority and as those that are on the extreme become a smaller (and often more vocal) group they become the extremists. Increasingly the extremists (not necessarily just of Islam) become even more radical and even further away from the bulk of the adherents of said religion.
The problem we seem to have with Islam currently is that the extreme are a significant bunch in numbers, funding and tacit support. There are also some mosques that are continual stirrers of hatred and there too high a degree of appeasement in this area.
The ongoing problem is how we deal with these extremists, their supporters and the hate preachers without alienating the vast majority of Muslims that are peaceful, normal people that follow a religion for themselves and not others.
By suppressing or persecuting a religion not only do we risk radicalising many more people but we also become what we are afraid of.
What the answer is and how we deal with the scum element I do not know. I do know that how the matter is being dealt with now is not working and also that the anti-Muslim rhetoric which is becoming more and more commonplace is even less likely to work.
-
I'd argue we (in the west) should be clearly outlining the things that are no compatable with Western society and actively targeting them without fear of being brought up as non PC. IE if we clearly define that we are not cool with FMG, forced marriage, child marriage, spousal abuse (which in theory we aren't regardless of religion) then we target that agressively.
But only if combined with "agressive" tolerance of other aspects. IE a head scarf ban is fricking pointless & petty & does nothing bar stop women going out & make them feel persecuted. So anyone discriminating re that needs to be come down on like a ton of bricks, as does hate speech inciting that. You wont stop people muttering "Raghead" as a woman walks past them with her kids, but it can't be where we are heading where they feel they can shout it. Its no different to the way there are homophobes & racists around, but they have been supressed from shouting Fag or Nggr at people.
We are alas moving towards that being OK with regard to Muslims because they are all terriorists who don't assimilate, hate our freedoms & want Sharia.
The bullshit stories of no-go areas or Sharia being enforced are utter dross. Most of the things 99% of Muslims do day in day out is completely compatible with Western society.
Same as with Orthodox Jews, the Amish, Jehovas Witnesses etc, the Mormons (who used to like polygamy) - any of the slightly harder core religions.
We are in a bad place now in that we are moving towards persucuting Muslims for being Muslims, instead of persecuting the (small) minority who do stuff incompatible. And we are empowering a generation of ignorant bigots, which just pushes more people to the extremes.
Politically what needs to happen is recognition that not all Islam is the same and just because the Saudis & Qataris have lots of money & are our "allies" does not mean we should be green lighting wahabbism. In contrast as Nick noted an Ahmadi mosque is a HUGELY different beast from a Wahabbi mosque, and should be treated as such. Knee jerk populist polititans wont help this as their followers will simply see "Islam" as opposed to the variations.
The Failed policy of Multiculturalism