Royal drama
-
-
Oprah has returned to 'clarify' that the skin tone comments weren't the Queen (not surprised) or Phillip (surprised) but still a lot of potentially innocent family members slandered by lack of specifics.
American audience has lapped up the mean nasty horrible racist Brits narrative, but I'm not sure how Harry builds bridges with the others after this.
-
@mokey said in Royal drama:
Oprah has returned to 'clarify' that the skin tone comments weren't the Queen (not surprised) or Phillip (surprised) but still a lot of potentially innocent family members slandered by lack of specifics.
American audience has lapped up the mean nasty horrible racist Brits narrative, but I'm not sure how Harry builds bridges with the others after this.
Indeed. How does he reconcile with family when the marriage breaks down?
And agree, am surprised it wasn't Phil.
Has there ever a nastier more vindictive spat between in-laws?
-
@nostrildamus said in Royal drama:
They were worried the boy would have dark skin? Not worried he might turn out to be a ginger?
Priorities, people!This has probably been around for ages, but I've seen it in a lot of Facebook comments in the last 24 hours. #TSFgoesfullDaysofOurLives
-
@booboo said in Royal drama:
@mokey said in Royal drama:
Oprah has returned to 'clarify' that the skin tone comments weren't the Queen (not surprised) or Phillip (surprised) but still a lot of potentially innocent family members slandered by lack of specifics.
American audience has lapped up the mean nasty horrible racist Brits narrative, but I'm not sure how Harry builds bridges with the others after this.
Indeed. How does he reconcile with family when the marriage breaks down?
And agree, am surprised it wasn't Phil.
Has there ever a nastier more vindictive spat between in-laws?
Harry is complicit in throwing his family under the bus for personal gain. Not the first person to do so, but still not cool
-
@mokey said in Royal drama:
Oprah has returned to 'clarify' that the skin tone comments weren't the Queen (not surprised) or Phillip (surprised) but still a lot of potentially innocent family members slandered by lack of specifics.
American audience has lapped up the mean nasty horrible racist Brits narrative, but I'm not sure how Harry builds bridges with the others after this.
Yeah I’ve had a few comments from Yanks today ....
Will be fish and chips paper soon
-
@donsteppa said in Royal drama:
@nostrildamus said in Royal drama:
They were worried the boy would have dark skin? Not worried he might turn out to be a ginger?
Priorities, people!This has probably been around for ages, but I've seen it in a lot of Facebook comments in the last 24 hours. #TSFgoesfullDaysofOurLives
That’s an oldie but a goody. I shared it on FB years ago and got some hilarious grief from a real pro royalist who claimed there is rangas down the line somewhere and that’s why Harry has the hair that he does. Nothing to do with old what’s his name. ( apparently )
But the Royals will be thrilled they have the chance to have a pop at Harry and Megan and distract the world from the fact they have a Paedo in their midst.
-
@mn5 said in Royal drama:
@donsteppa said in Royal drama:
@nostrildamus said in Royal drama:
They were worried the boy would have dark skin? Not worried he might turn out to be a ginger?
Priorities, people!This has probably been around for ages, but I've seen it in a lot of Facebook comments in the last 24 hours. #TSFgoesfullDaysofOurLives
That’s an oldie but a goody. I shared it on FB years ago and got some hilarious grief from a real pro royalist who claimed there is rangas down the line somewhere and that’s why Harry has the hair that he does. Nothing to do with old what’s his name. ( apparently )
But the Royals will be thrilled they have the chance to have a pop at Harry and Megan and distract the world from the fact they have a Paedo in their midst.
Don't you go marginalising sexual abusers of children and young people:
-
@mokey said in Royal drama:
Oprah has returned to 'clarify' that the skin tone comments weren't the Queen (not surprised) or Phillip (surprised) but still a lot of potentially innocent family members slandered by lack of specifics.
Andrew would be a good choice.
-
@snowy I don't think the ruckus with Meghan and Harry would be nearly as bad if they had actually done something about Andrew. The whole we will investigate the bullying claim from 2 years ago looks particularly pathetic against pedo prince we are pretending we don't know about.
-
@mn5 said in Royal drama:
@donsteppa said in Royal drama:
@nostrildamus said in Royal drama:
They were worried the boy would have dark skin? Not worried he might turn out to be a ginger?
Priorities, people!This has probably been around for ages, but I've seen it in a lot of Facebook comments in the last 24 hours. #TSFgoesfullDaysofOurLives
That’s an oldie but a goody. I shared it on FB years ago and got some hilarious grief from a real pro royalist who claimed there is rangas down the line somewhere and that’s why Harry has the hair that he does. Nothing to do with old what’s his name. ( apparently )
The quip from the last big tell-all Royal interview about 'three in the marriage' might have been an undercount...
-
@mokey said in Royal drama:
particularly pathetic against pedo prince we are pretending we don't know about.
Nice alliteration there, you should write books. Actually a pedo prince could be quite a good villain in an historical novel, but yes I agree. Quibbling over who was discussing "shades of grey" - beige, in this case - or bullying for that matter, is the thinnest of thinly veiled distractions from the elephant in the phone box that a pedo prince is.
-