• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps vs Bangles

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
671 Posts 39 Posters 92.2k Views
Black Caps vs Bangles
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #41

    @booboo said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @Damo see you nearly did it again.

    Broom dropped. A sitter.

    Fiddy up for young Thomas

    Ha ha . Yes I'm happy that was dropped or I might have been banned from posting.

    MokeyM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #42

    @Damo No 'might' about it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by booboo
    #43

    I'll ket you off that one @Damo

    Broom goorne. Lb. Reasonably outish.

    Did ok but does 22 justify his inclusion over a youngun?

    JNeesh 4 first up

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    Bit disappointing from Broom really. Hope he gets three games to show his stuff, but he needs to take his chances.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #45

    @booboo How the fuck is Broom even in the team???

    Seriously, are we that short on talent that we wheel him out rather than trying out an up and comer and seeing what happens?

    DamoD H 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #46

    @Mokey said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @booboo How the fuck is Broom even in the team???

    Seriously, are we that short on talent that we wheel him out rather than trying out an up and comer and seeing what happens?

    I don't know. I think giving an experienced bloke another go has some merit. Experience is underrated in cricket imo.

    Who else is really screaming for inclusion ahead of Broom?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #47

    Maybe if he does a Voges or Hussey over the next season or three ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    I could see that lbw coming a mile off. Got to get forward to this guy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    Munro goes big.

    Wickets just holding us back.

    Reckon we're sitting on par at the moment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #50

    WASP says 286. Reckon that's at least 20 short

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    Anything close to 300 should be enough. Nice to see Latham in the runs, he has a habit of not converting though, fingers crossed he cam go big.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Understand why Careless Whispers was being playing in the coverage now. RIP George Michael.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #53

    Momentum has been sucked out of the innings in last few overs . Something gotta give soon.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #54

    @Mokey said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @booboo How the fuck is Broom even in the team???

    Seriously, are we that short on talent that we wheel him out rather than trying out an up and comer and seeing what happens?

    Great domestic record voer the past few seasons http://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Players/44/44374/a_Batting_by_Season.html

    I would not have picked him myself but the selection does make some sense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #55

    @booboo said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    WASP says 286. Reckon that's at least 20 short

    I have seen WASP give chasing teams little chance in the Super Smash when they only need ten runs an over.

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #56

    @hydro11 said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @booboo said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    WASP says 286. Reckon that's at least 20 short

    I have seen WASP give chasing teams little chance in the Super Smash when they only need ten runs an over.

    WASP needs to come into the T20 age.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    Good hundred for Latham.

    We should be targeting 100 off the last 10.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    Good hundred.

    Even though Munro is scoring, he still looks a crap player

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #59

    Only 11 players have carried their bat in an ODI. The chance of latham doing it is remote

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    Wasp 286 prediction hit with 6 overs to go and 6 wickets in hand ....

    I guess we are due for a collapse ...

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps vs Bangles
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.