• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
947 Posts 62 Posters 100.0k Views
Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by Siam
    #11

    Just watching the highlights, Starc's michelle and even Hazelwoods wicket are exquisite examples of reverse swing.
    Starcs deliveries are held like inswingers yet tail away right to left late. In Hazelwoods wicket that ball, if new, tends straight or slightly away.

    Really impressive stuff from a special bowling unit the ockers have got. Africans will have to prepare green seamers to have a shot this series I'm thinking. Otherwise Lyon and reverse will be dominant

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #12

    @nta Amla's not really the batsman he was. I see he's nearly 35 and can't be far from done.

    Looks like the Jaapie batsmen - excluding AB - aren't going to be good enough.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #13

    @chris-b early days.

    Amla definitely isn't what he was, but then neither is Khawaja.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    So after a healthy 400+ lead, we're currently skittling the Protobokeas by the looks.

    They're 4 down for negative 350-odd.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Cummins v Faf's off stump. Glorious bit of bowling...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    They've added another 60 with no loss. 295 to go.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #17

    Century to Markram - which could have been even better if he hadn't been involved in the ABdV runout.

    But the Proteas at 9 down and still 124 runs behind, you'd say they're done. Could have been over by now except for all the time they've lost to bad light.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by Chris B.
    #18

    Pretty handy having people like Starc to shut the prospect of wagging tails down.

    De Cock and Markram both well set and cruising along - needing less than 130.

    Markram gets out.

    Next thing Starc takes three tail end wickets in one over and it's thanks for coming SA.

    Elgar Amla, AB and Faf look similarly crestfallen as our ODI middle order - the other guys have done so well that even modest contributions might have been enough - but, fuck all isn't!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    [Blackcaps mode]any rain forecast?[/Blackcaps mode]

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #20

    @mariner4life said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    It's not too hard to see why test cricket is fucked. SA v Aus is a massive series. And no one turned up. No one turned up to watch SA v India either. No one turns up in NZ to watch tests. Not many turn up to watch in Aus unless it's England, or the Indian fans to watch India. Why would administrators schedule tests when they don't make any money from it. It's dead.

    As for the game, Aus 225/5 when bad light stopped play. As usual Smith and Warner have top scored with a 50 each.

    This post is depressing and accurate. I love good test cricket but I do worry it is gonna cease to exist at some stage.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by Siam
    #21

    Fuck having to wrestle your vice captain away into a dressing room because he doesn't have enough self control when your team is one wicket away from smashing South Africa!

    Clever sound bite coaching for scripted telly interviews doth not maketh the man

    Stuff
    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #22

    @siam said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Fuck having to wrestle your vice captain away into a dressing room because he doesn't have enough self control when your team is one wicket away from smashing South Africa!

    Clever sound bite coaching for scripted telly interviews doth not maketh the man

    Stuff

    I'm a sucker and old fashioned, so I looked up the spirit of cricket.
    https://www.lords.org/mcc/mcc-spirit-of-cricket/what-is-mcc-spirit-of-cricket/spirit-of-cricket-preamble-to-the-laws/
    4. The Spirit of the Game involves RESPECT for:
    Your opponents ... Your own captain ... The game's traditional values

    and
    5. It is against the Spirit of the Game:
    To direct abusive language towards an opponent or umpire.. To indulge in cheating or any sharp practice

    And then I thought about the Aussies, and how they apparently play within the spirit of cricket (but headbutt 'the line').

    Yeah. Effective, but ugly, and I think it's against the spirit of the game. That's thei choice, and I don't have a huge issue with them being pork chops, just pretending to be saints who uphold the spirit of the game while abusing anyone who gets in their way.

    Screw those guys.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    How do they 'pretend to be saints'? They are generally pretty open about liking some chat on the field. They assure us they know where the line is, which is proven incorrect on a regular basis, but still.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #24

    @barbarian Likely that view goes back to the Phil Hughes tragedy and some of the stuff spouted then. Time to move on methinks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Nope not going there..

    To be fair looking at the cctv footage seems almost a non event. I was expecting punches thrown etc, was very underwhelming tbh

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    I wonder if someone mentioned SBW

    V 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #27

    @pukunui said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    I wonder if someone mentioned SBW

    And the rest..

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    Is it wishful thinking but I kind of imagine a McGrath v Sarwon scenario where the Aussie goes personal, cops a personal one back and loses plot because it "crosses the line" / he's an immature prat.

    V boobooB MN5M 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #29

    @booboo said in Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket:

    Is it wishful thinking but I kind of imagine a McGrath v Sarwon scenario where the Aussie goes personal, cops a personal one back and loses plot because it "crosses the line" / he's an immature prat.

    Happy to dish it out, can’t take it when it’s thrown back. ( not just picking on Davy dumb dumb, I’m sure this applies to several cricketers)

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    David Warner is such a complete cockstain. The way he carries on is a complete, or at least should be, a complete embarrassment. Describing cricket as "war" before the Ashes? jesus fuck David.

    Lo and behold, once the claims and counter-claims come out, it's looking very much like personal shit one way, personal shit the other way, and explosion, and yes, sounding very Glen McGrath-ish. Davey has to know that sledge is always going to come if he pushes, why can't he let it go?

    Steve Smith's "explanation" should be re-worded for honesty. "we believe we play our best cricket when we are being abusive assholes on the field" You're not being "aggressive", you're being abusive knowing full well there will be no physical retribution.

    And before any Aussies jump on the "it's not just us" bandwagon, i am well aware of that. Not many other sides take such public pride in it though.

    Chris B.C MokeyM 2 Replies Last reply
    12

Convicts v Marxist Land Thieves - Crucket
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.