• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Wallabies v Pumas

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
131 Posts 38 Posters 6.7k Views
Wallabies v Pumas
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Cheika has seen the light.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    How long did it take him to put the one dimensional strike weapon on the wing? Not seen the light about unbalanced back rows yet, tho

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SapetyviS Offline
    SapetyviS Offline
    Sapetyvi
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    I didn't see the full game last weekend, but what I saw I thought Samu was good. The Hooper contract seems crazier by the moment. Tho it would probably be Pocock who drops out as long as Cheika is coach.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    I'm actually looking forward to this game. I really enjoyed watching Argentina last week and love the speed and skill of their backs. Australia fielding a pretty experienced side which must be close to their best?

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #7

    Michael Hooper out of tomorrow’s match vs Pumas with hammy injury. Pete Samu goes to No.8 and Pocock to captain and play No.7. Hanigan onto the bench.

    chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #8

    @kiwimurph said in Wallabies v Pumas:

    Michael Hooper out of tomorrow’s match vs Pumas with hammy injury. Pete Samu goes to No.8 and Pocock to captain and play No.7

    Better balanced loose forward trio IMO, be interesting to see how they go.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to chimoaus on last edited by
    #9

    @chimoaus said in Wallabies v Pumas:

    I'm actually looking forward to this game. I really enjoyed watching Argentina last week and love the speed and skill of their backs. Australia fielding a pretty experienced side which must be close to their best?

    Got to be better than last week's AUS SA game. Was turgid -- gave up after 15 minutes

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Two weeks in a row Cheika has been forced to play only one no.7 but you know he wants both Hooper and Pocock in the team. It seems common sense doesn't matter to him.

    Let's hope that Arg don't bottle it as they never seem to play as well against Aust as they do against NZ.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by taniwharugby
    #11

    @bovidae with Folou to the wing and only one of Pocock or Hooper playing (and in the right place at 7) they look much better balanced.

    Yeah be good for the Argies to start fulfilling the promise they show for long periods against us, against other 'top' teams too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #12

    Back row, 10/12 and back 3 look about the best balanced I’ve seen from Cheika.

    Add to that the United Pacific Nations of Australia starting and bench front rows, two big locks - and this looks a decent side.

    Argies by 4

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SapetyviS Offline
    SapetyviS Offline
    Sapetyvi
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Would be surprised If The Aussies won't win this, best starting XV in a long time.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Sapetyvi on last edited by
    #14

    @sapetyvi and the Argies seem to go big against the Boks and ABs the first three rounds, then fall on a heap against us.

    The scheduling needs a shake up

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Pity about Hooper. I prefer him to Pocock. Better all round.

    Still better balanced in backrow as mentioned.

    Oz by 4-8

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #16

    @nta said in Wallabies v Pumas:

    @sapetyvi and the Argies seem to go big against the Boks and ABs the first three rounds, then fall on a heap against us.

    The scheduling needs a shake up

    Yep. They've usually well and truly blown their load by this stage. Aus comfortably.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #17

    @mikethesnow said in Wallabies v Pumas:

    Pity about Hooper. I prefer him to Pocock. Better all round.

    Still better balanced in backrow as mentioned.

    Oz by 4-8

    To me Pocock is better in tight and in turnovers, and gets himself involved more, but is slower than me and I'm in my 50s! Hooper on the other hand is fast, and can hurt you from broken play. As always, all about getting the balance right.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    I reckon the Argies have the firepower out wide to take this and as long as the forwards don't crumble have a great chance against what is hardly a Wallaby backline for the ages.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #19

    @crucial said in Wallabies v Pumas:

    I reckon the Argies have the firepower out wide to take this and as long as the forwards don't crumble have a great chance against what is hardly a Wallaby backline for the ages.

    Watching Ozzies cry always brings a lump to the throat.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #20

    @pakman said in Wallabies v Pumas:

    @crucial said in Wallabies v Pumas:

    I reckon the Argies have the firepower out wide to take this and as long as the forwards don't crumble have a great chance against what is hardly a Wallaby backline for the ages.

    Watching Ozzies cry always brings a lump to the throat.

    That's what... She said?

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Ha. Rugby World Cup has announced David Peacock playing for Aus on Facebook... don't know how to link it.

    Don't read the comments ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Small crowd.

    Isnt it a bit stupid for the ARU to have 2 games in southeast QLD in successive weeks?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Wallabies v Pumas
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.